Marketing the research missions of academic medical centers: Why messages blurring lines between clinical care and research are bad for both business and ethics

Mark A Yarborough, Timothy Houk, Sarah Tinker Perrault, Yael Schenker, Richard R. Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) offer patient care and perform research. Increasingly, AMCs advertise to the public in order to garner income that can support these dual missions. In what follows, we raise concerns about the ways that advertising blurs important distinctions between them. Such blurring is detrimental to AMC efforts to fulfill critically important ethical responsibilities pertaining both to science communication and clinical research, because marketing campaigns can employ hype that weakens research integrity and contributes to therapeutic misconception and misestimation, undermining the informed consent process that is essential to the ethical conduct of research. We offer ethical analysis of common advertising practices that justify these concerns. We also suggest the need for a deliberative body convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges and others to develop a set of voluntary guidelines that AMCs can use to avoid in the future, the problems found in many current AMC advertising practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-475
Number of pages8
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Business Ethics
Marketing
marketing
moral philosophy
Therapeutic Misconception
Research
communication sciences
Ethical Analysis
patient care
integrity
American Medical Association
Informed Consent
campaign
Patient Care
income
responsibility
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Advertising practices
  • Clinical research
  • Informed consent
  • Marketing
  • Science communication
  • Therapeutic misconception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Marketing the research missions of academic medical centers : Why messages blurring lines between clinical care and research are bad for both business and ethics. / Yarborough, Mark A; Houk, Timothy; Perrault, Sarah Tinker; Schenker, Yael; Sharp, Richard R.

In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.07.2019, p. 468-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eae0adf0e8694b47a88e311bf0e34365,
title = "Marketing the research missions of academic medical centers: Why messages blurring lines between clinical care and research are bad for both business and ethics",
abstract = "Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) offer patient care and perform research. Increasingly, AMCs advertise to the public in order to garner income that can support these dual missions. In what follows, we raise concerns about the ways that advertising blurs important distinctions between them. Such blurring is detrimental to AMC efforts to fulfill critically important ethical responsibilities pertaining both to science communication and clinical research, because marketing campaigns can employ hype that weakens research integrity and contributes to therapeutic misconception and misestimation, undermining the informed consent process that is essential to the ethical conduct of research. We offer ethical analysis of common advertising practices that justify these concerns. We also suggest the need for a deliberative body convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges and others to develop a set of voluntary guidelines that AMCs can use to avoid in the future, the problems found in many current AMC advertising practices.",
keywords = "Academic Medical Centers, Advertising practices, Clinical research, Informed consent, Marketing, Science communication, Therapeutic misconception",
author = "Yarborough, {Mark A} and Timothy Houk and Perrault, {Sarah Tinker} and Yael Schenker and Sharp, {Richard R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0963180119000392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "468--475",
journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
issn = "0963-1801",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marketing the research missions of academic medical centers

T2 - Why messages blurring lines between clinical care and research are bad for both business and ethics

AU - Yarborough, Mark A

AU - Houk, Timothy

AU - Perrault, Sarah Tinker

AU - Schenker, Yael

AU - Sharp, Richard R.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) offer patient care and perform research. Increasingly, AMCs advertise to the public in order to garner income that can support these dual missions. In what follows, we raise concerns about the ways that advertising blurs important distinctions between them. Such blurring is detrimental to AMC efforts to fulfill critically important ethical responsibilities pertaining both to science communication and clinical research, because marketing campaigns can employ hype that weakens research integrity and contributes to therapeutic misconception and misestimation, undermining the informed consent process that is essential to the ethical conduct of research. We offer ethical analysis of common advertising practices that justify these concerns. We also suggest the need for a deliberative body convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges and others to develop a set of voluntary guidelines that AMCs can use to avoid in the future, the problems found in many current AMC advertising practices.

AB - Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) offer patient care and perform research. Increasingly, AMCs advertise to the public in order to garner income that can support these dual missions. In what follows, we raise concerns about the ways that advertising blurs important distinctions between them. Such blurring is detrimental to AMC efforts to fulfill critically important ethical responsibilities pertaining both to science communication and clinical research, because marketing campaigns can employ hype that weakens research integrity and contributes to therapeutic misconception and misestimation, undermining the informed consent process that is essential to the ethical conduct of research. We offer ethical analysis of common advertising practices that justify these concerns. We also suggest the need for a deliberative body convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges and others to develop a set of voluntary guidelines that AMCs can use to avoid in the future, the problems found in many current AMC advertising practices.

KW - Academic Medical Centers

KW - Advertising practices

KW - Clinical research

KW - Informed consent

KW - Marketing

KW - Science communication

KW - Therapeutic misconception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069054936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069054936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180119000392

DO - 10.1017/S0963180119000392

M3 - Article

C2 - 31298193

AN - SCOPUS:85069054936

VL - 28

SP - 468

EP - 475

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 3

ER -