Managing the common problem of missing data in trauma studies

Tessa Rue, Hilaire J. Thompson, Frederick P. Rivara, Ellen J. Mackenzie, Gregory Jurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To provide guidance for managing the problem of missing data in clinical studies of trauma in order to decrease bias and increase the validity of findings for subsequent use. Organizing Construct: A thoughtful approach to missing data is an essential component of analysis to promote the clear interpretation of study findings. Methods: Integrative review of relevant biostatistics, medical and nursing literature, and case exemplars of missing data analyses using multiple linear regression based upon data from the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) was used as an example. Findings and Conclusions: In studies of traumatically injured people, multiple imputed values are often superior to complete case analyses that might have significant bias. Multiple imputation can improve accuracy of the assessment and might also improve precision of estimates. Sensitivity analyses which implements repeated analyses using various scenarios may also be useful in providing information supportive of further inquiry. This stepwise approach of missing data could also be valid in studies with similar types or patterns of missing data. Clinical Relevance: In interpreting and applying findings of studies with missing data, clinicians need to ensure that researchers have used appropriate methods for handling this issue. If suitable methods were not employed, nurse clinicians need to be aware that the findings may be biased.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-378
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Biostatistics
Nurse Clinicians
Linear Models
Nursing
Research Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Data collection
  • Multiple imputation
  • Precision
  • Sensitivity analyses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Managing the common problem of missing data in trauma studies. / Rue, Tessa; Thompson, Hilaire J.; Rivara, Frederick P.; Mackenzie, Ellen J.; Jurkovich, Gregory.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.12.2008, p. 373-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rue, Tessa ; Thompson, Hilaire J. ; Rivara, Frederick P. ; Mackenzie, Ellen J. ; Jurkovich, Gregory. / Managing the common problem of missing data in trauma studies. In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 373-378.
@article{9f72cdce3cb0443ba18396e83bad0aa4,
title = "Managing the common problem of missing data in trauma studies",
abstract = "Purpose: To provide guidance for managing the problem of missing data in clinical studies of trauma in order to decrease bias and increase the validity of findings for subsequent use. Organizing Construct: A thoughtful approach to missing data is an essential component of analysis to promote the clear interpretation of study findings. Methods: Integrative review of relevant biostatistics, medical and nursing literature, and case exemplars of missing data analyses using multiple linear regression based upon data from the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) was used as an example. Findings and Conclusions: In studies of traumatically injured people, multiple imputed values are often superior to complete case analyses that might have significant bias. Multiple imputation can improve accuracy of the assessment and might also improve precision of estimates. Sensitivity analyses which implements repeated analyses using various scenarios may also be useful in providing information supportive of further inquiry. This stepwise approach of missing data could also be valid in studies with similar types or patterns of missing data. Clinical Relevance: In interpreting and applying findings of studies with missing data, clinicians need to ensure that researchers have used appropriate methods for handling this issue. If suitable methods were not employed, nurse clinicians need to be aware that the findings may be biased.",
keywords = "Bias, Data collection, Multiple imputation, Precision, Sensitivity analyses",
author = "Tessa Rue and Thompson, {Hilaire J.} and Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Mackenzie, {Ellen J.} and Gregory Jurkovich",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00252.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "373--378",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing the common problem of missing data in trauma studies

AU - Rue, Tessa

AU - Thompson, Hilaire J.

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Mackenzie, Ellen J.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To provide guidance for managing the problem of missing data in clinical studies of trauma in order to decrease bias and increase the validity of findings for subsequent use. Organizing Construct: A thoughtful approach to missing data is an essential component of analysis to promote the clear interpretation of study findings. Methods: Integrative review of relevant biostatistics, medical and nursing literature, and case exemplars of missing data analyses using multiple linear regression based upon data from the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) was used as an example. Findings and Conclusions: In studies of traumatically injured people, multiple imputed values are often superior to complete case analyses that might have significant bias. Multiple imputation can improve accuracy of the assessment and might also improve precision of estimates. Sensitivity analyses which implements repeated analyses using various scenarios may also be useful in providing information supportive of further inquiry. This stepwise approach of missing data could also be valid in studies with similar types or patterns of missing data. Clinical Relevance: In interpreting and applying findings of studies with missing data, clinicians need to ensure that researchers have used appropriate methods for handling this issue. If suitable methods were not employed, nurse clinicians need to be aware that the findings may be biased.

AB - Purpose: To provide guidance for managing the problem of missing data in clinical studies of trauma in order to decrease bias and increase the validity of findings for subsequent use. Organizing Construct: A thoughtful approach to missing data is an essential component of analysis to promote the clear interpretation of study findings. Methods: Integrative review of relevant biostatistics, medical and nursing literature, and case exemplars of missing data analyses using multiple linear regression based upon data from the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) was used as an example. Findings and Conclusions: In studies of traumatically injured people, multiple imputed values are often superior to complete case analyses that might have significant bias. Multiple imputation can improve accuracy of the assessment and might also improve precision of estimates. Sensitivity analyses which implements repeated analyses using various scenarios may also be useful in providing information supportive of further inquiry. This stepwise approach of missing data could also be valid in studies with similar types or patterns of missing data. Clinical Relevance: In interpreting and applying findings of studies with missing data, clinicians need to ensure that researchers have used appropriate methods for handling this issue. If suitable methods were not employed, nurse clinicians need to be aware that the findings may be biased.

KW - Bias

KW - Data collection

KW - Multiple imputation

KW - Precision

KW - Sensitivity analyses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56849106714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56849106714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00252.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00252.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19094153

AN - SCOPUS:56849106714

VL - 40

SP - 373

EP - 378

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 4

ER -