Management of the low-grade abnormal Pap smear: What are women's preferences?

Joy Melnikow, Miriam Kuppermann, Stephen Birch, Benjamin K S Chan, James Nuovo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preferences among ethnically diverse women for the management of a low-grade abnormal Pap smear result: early colposcopy or observation with repeat Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: Structured interviews were conducted with 170 women of diverse ethnic backgrounds to assess their preferences. Trained personnel conducted standardized interviews. A standard description of all tests and procedures was read to participants. The participants were presented with scenarios of contrasting management approaches for a hypothetical low-grade abnormal Pap smear result-observation with repeat Pap smear vs. immediate colposcopy. POPULATION: Study participants were recruited from the waiting rooms of 5 family planning clinics in Northern California's Central Valley. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measures for each scenario were utilities (quantified preferences for specific health states) measured by the Standard Gamble. RESULTS: The range in utilities was large for all scenarios. Mean utilities (SD) for observation: 0.96 (± 0.13) followed by resolution; 0.93 (± 0.17) followed by cryotherapy; 0.91 (± 0.21) followed by cone biopsy. Mean utilities for early colposcopy: 0.93 (± 0.20) followed by resolution; 0.95 (± 0.14) followed by cryotherapy; and 0.92 (± 0.16) followed by cone biopsy. Subject characteristics explained less than 20% of the variance in utilities. Decision analysis gave a slightly higher overall utility for early colposcopy (0.940 vs 0.932 for observation), but was sensitive to small changes in branch utilities. CONCLUSIONS: Women's preferences for management of a low-grade abnormal Pap result vary widely. Clinicians should adopt a flexible approach to the management of low-grade abnormal Pap smears to incorporate individual preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)849-855
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume51
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
Colposcopy
Observation
Cryotherapy
Interviews
Biopsy
Decision Support Techniques
Family Planning Services
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health

Keywords

  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Pap smear
  • Patient preferences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Management of the low-grade abnormal Pap smear : What are women's preferences? / Melnikow, Joy; Kuppermann, Miriam; Birch, Stephen; Chan, Benjamin K S; Nuovo, James.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 51, No. 10, 01.10.2002, p. 849-855.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Melnikow, Joy ; Kuppermann, Miriam ; Birch, Stephen ; Chan, Benjamin K S ; Nuovo, James. / Management of the low-grade abnormal Pap smear : What are women's preferences?. In: Journal of Family Practice. 2002 ; Vol. 51, No. 10. pp. 849-855.
@article{b57c72a85d3c43b882c8777d488d0734,
title = "Management of the low-grade abnormal Pap smear: What are women's preferences?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preferences among ethnically diverse women for the management of a low-grade abnormal Pap smear result: early colposcopy or observation with repeat Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: Structured interviews were conducted with 170 women of diverse ethnic backgrounds to assess their preferences. Trained personnel conducted standardized interviews. A standard description of all tests and procedures was read to participants. The participants were presented with scenarios of contrasting management approaches for a hypothetical low-grade abnormal Pap smear result-observation with repeat Pap smear vs. immediate colposcopy. POPULATION: Study participants were recruited from the waiting rooms of 5 family planning clinics in Northern California's Central Valley. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measures for each scenario were utilities (quantified preferences for specific health states) measured by the Standard Gamble. RESULTS: The range in utilities was large for all scenarios. Mean utilities (SD) for observation: 0.96 (± 0.13) followed by resolution; 0.93 (± 0.17) followed by cryotherapy; 0.91 (± 0.21) followed by cone biopsy. Mean utilities for early colposcopy: 0.93 (± 0.20) followed by resolution; 0.95 (± 0.14) followed by cryotherapy; and 0.92 (± 0.16) followed by cone biopsy. Subject characteristics explained less than 20{\%} of the variance in utilities. Decision analysis gave a slightly higher overall utility for early colposcopy (0.940 vs 0.932 for observation), but was sensitive to small changes in branch utilities. CONCLUSIONS: Women's preferences for management of a low-grade abnormal Pap result vary widely. Clinicians should adopt a flexible approach to the management of low-grade abnormal Pap smears to incorporate individual preferences.",
keywords = "Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Pap smear, Patient preferences",
author = "Joy Melnikow and Miriam Kuppermann and Stephen Birch and Chan, {Benjamin K S} and James Nuovo",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "849--855",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of the low-grade abnormal Pap smear

T2 - What are women's preferences?

AU - Melnikow, Joy

AU - Kuppermann, Miriam

AU - Birch, Stephen

AU - Chan, Benjamin K S

AU - Nuovo, James

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preferences among ethnically diverse women for the management of a low-grade abnormal Pap smear result: early colposcopy or observation with repeat Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: Structured interviews were conducted with 170 women of diverse ethnic backgrounds to assess their preferences. Trained personnel conducted standardized interviews. A standard description of all tests and procedures was read to participants. The participants were presented with scenarios of contrasting management approaches for a hypothetical low-grade abnormal Pap smear result-observation with repeat Pap smear vs. immediate colposcopy. POPULATION: Study participants were recruited from the waiting rooms of 5 family planning clinics in Northern California's Central Valley. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measures for each scenario were utilities (quantified preferences for specific health states) measured by the Standard Gamble. RESULTS: The range in utilities was large for all scenarios. Mean utilities (SD) for observation: 0.96 (± 0.13) followed by resolution; 0.93 (± 0.17) followed by cryotherapy; 0.91 (± 0.21) followed by cone biopsy. Mean utilities for early colposcopy: 0.93 (± 0.20) followed by resolution; 0.95 (± 0.14) followed by cryotherapy; and 0.92 (± 0.16) followed by cone biopsy. Subject characteristics explained less than 20% of the variance in utilities. Decision analysis gave a slightly higher overall utility for early colposcopy (0.940 vs 0.932 for observation), but was sensitive to small changes in branch utilities. CONCLUSIONS: Women's preferences for management of a low-grade abnormal Pap result vary widely. Clinicians should adopt a flexible approach to the management of low-grade abnormal Pap smears to incorporate individual preferences.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preferences among ethnically diverse women for the management of a low-grade abnormal Pap smear result: early colposcopy or observation with repeat Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: Structured interviews were conducted with 170 women of diverse ethnic backgrounds to assess their preferences. Trained personnel conducted standardized interviews. A standard description of all tests and procedures was read to participants. The participants were presented with scenarios of contrasting management approaches for a hypothetical low-grade abnormal Pap smear result-observation with repeat Pap smear vs. immediate colposcopy. POPULATION: Study participants were recruited from the waiting rooms of 5 family planning clinics in Northern California's Central Valley. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measures for each scenario were utilities (quantified preferences for specific health states) measured by the Standard Gamble. RESULTS: The range in utilities was large for all scenarios. Mean utilities (SD) for observation: 0.96 (± 0.13) followed by resolution; 0.93 (± 0.17) followed by cryotherapy; 0.91 (± 0.21) followed by cone biopsy. Mean utilities for early colposcopy: 0.93 (± 0.20) followed by resolution; 0.95 (± 0.14) followed by cryotherapy; and 0.92 (± 0.16) followed by cone biopsy. Subject characteristics explained less than 20% of the variance in utilities. Decision analysis gave a slightly higher overall utility for early colposcopy (0.940 vs 0.932 for observation), but was sensitive to small changes in branch utilities. CONCLUSIONS: Women's preferences for management of a low-grade abnormal Pap result vary widely. Clinicians should adopt a flexible approach to the management of low-grade abnormal Pap smears to incorporate individual preferences.

KW - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

KW - Pap smear

KW - Patient preferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036790597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036790597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12401153

AN - SCOPUS:0036790597

VL - 51

SP - 849

EP - 855

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 10

ER -