Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds

A western trauma association multicenter trial

Walter L. Biffl, Krista L. Kaups, C. Clay Cothren, Karen J. Brasel, Rochelle A. Dicker, M. Kelley Bullard, James M. Haan, Gregory Jurkovich, Paul Harrison, Forrest O. Moore, Martin Schreiber, M. Margaret Knudson, Ernest E. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The optimal management of hemodynamically stable, asymptomatic patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains controversial. The goal is to identify and treat injuries in a safe, cost-effective manner. Common evaluation strategies include local wound exploration (LWE)/diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), serial clinical assessments (SCAs), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical course of patients managed by the various strategies, to determine whether there are differences in associated nontherapeutic laparotomy (NONTHER LAP), emergency department (ED) discharge, or complication rates. Methods: A multicenter, Institutional Review Board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was individualized according to surgeon/institutional protocols. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively. Results: Three hundred fifty -nine patients were studied. Eighty-one had indications for immediate LAP, of which 84% were therapeutic. ED D/C was facilitated by LWE, CT, and DPL in 23%, 21%, and 16% of patients, respectively. On the other hand, LAP based on abnormalities on LWE, CT, and DPL were NONTHER in 57%, 24%, and 31% of patients, respectively. Twelve percent of patients selected for SCA ultimately had LAP (33% were NONTHER); there was no apparent morbidity due to delay in intervention. Conclusions: Shock, evisceration, and peritonitis warrant immediate LAP after AASW. Patients without these findings can be safely observed for signs or symptoms of bleeding or hollow viscus injury. To limit the number of hospital admissions, we propose a uniform strategy using LWE to ascertain the depth of penetration; the patient may be safely discharged in the absence of peritoneal violation. Peritoneal penetration, absent evidence of ongoing hemorrhage or hollow viscus injury, should not be considered an indication for LAP, but rather an indication for admission for SCAs. We suggest that a prospective multicenter trial be performed to document the safety and cost-effectiveness of such an approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1294-1301
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume66
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stab Wounds
Multicenter Studies
Wounds and Injuries
Peritoneal Lavage
Viscera
Tomography
Hospital Emergency Service
Hemorrhage
Dilatation and Curettage
Research Ethics Committees
Peritonitis
Laparotomy
Signs and Symptoms
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Shock
Morbidity
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Abdominal stab wounds
  • Abdominal trauma
  • Clinical assessments
  • Clinical trial
  • Computed tomography scan, serial
  • Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
  • Laparotomy
  • Local wound exploration
  • Multicenter
  • Penetrating trauma
  • Prospective
  • Protocol
  • Stab wounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Biffl, W. L., Kaups, K. L., Cothren, C. C., Brasel, K. J., Dicker, R. A., Bullard, M. K., ... Moore, E. E. (2009). Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: A western trauma association multicenter trial. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 66(5), 1294-1301. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688

Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds : A western trauma association multicenter trial. / Biffl, Walter L.; Kaups, Krista L.; Cothren, C. Clay; Brasel, Karen J.; Dicker, Rochelle A.; Bullard, M. Kelley; Haan, James M.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Harrison, Paul; Moore, Forrest O.; Schreiber, Martin; Knudson, M. Margaret; Moore, Ernest E.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 66, No. 5, 01.05.2009, p. 1294-1301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Biffl, WL, Kaups, KL, Cothren, CC, Brasel, KJ, Dicker, RA, Bullard, MK, Haan, JM, Jurkovich, G, Harrison, P, Moore, FO, Schreiber, M, Knudson, MM & Moore, EE 2009, 'Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: A western trauma association multicenter trial', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1294-1301. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688
Biffl, Walter L. ; Kaups, Krista L. ; Cothren, C. Clay ; Brasel, Karen J. ; Dicker, Rochelle A. ; Bullard, M. Kelley ; Haan, James M. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Harrison, Paul ; Moore, Forrest O. ; Schreiber, Martin ; Knudson, M. Margaret ; Moore, Ernest E. / Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds : A western trauma association multicenter trial. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2009 ; Vol. 66, No. 5. pp. 1294-1301.
@article{11bf1e36cd144079bcd4799484864696,
title = "Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: A western trauma association multicenter trial",
abstract = "Background: The optimal management of hemodynamically stable, asymptomatic patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains controversial. The goal is to identify and treat injuries in a safe, cost-effective manner. Common evaluation strategies include local wound exploration (LWE)/diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), serial clinical assessments (SCAs), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical course of patients managed by the various strategies, to determine whether there are differences in associated nontherapeutic laparotomy (NONTHER LAP), emergency department (ED) discharge, or complication rates. Methods: A multicenter, Institutional Review Board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was individualized according to surgeon/institutional protocols. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively. Results: Three hundred fifty -nine patients were studied. Eighty-one had indications for immediate LAP, of which 84{\%} were therapeutic. ED D/C was facilitated by LWE, CT, and DPL in 23{\%}, 21{\%}, and 16{\%} of patients, respectively. On the other hand, LAP based on abnormalities on LWE, CT, and DPL were NONTHER in 57{\%}, 24{\%}, and 31{\%} of patients, respectively. Twelve percent of patients selected for SCA ultimately had LAP (33{\%} were NONTHER); there was no apparent morbidity due to delay in intervention. Conclusions: Shock, evisceration, and peritonitis warrant immediate LAP after AASW. Patients without these findings can be safely observed for signs or symptoms of bleeding or hollow viscus injury. To limit the number of hospital admissions, we propose a uniform strategy using LWE to ascertain the depth of penetration; the patient may be safely discharged in the absence of peritoneal violation. Peritoneal penetration, absent evidence of ongoing hemorrhage or hollow viscus injury, should not be considered an indication for LAP, but rather an indication for admission for SCAs. We suggest that a prospective multicenter trial be performed to document the safety and cost-effectiveness of such an approach.",
keywords = "Abdominal stab wounds, Abdominal trauma, Clinical assessments, Clinical trial, Computed tomography scan, serial, Diagnostic peritoneal lavage, Laparotomy, Local wound exploration, Multicenter, Penetrating trauma, Prospective, Protocol, Stab wounds",
author = "Biffl, {Walter L.} and Kaups, {Krista L.} and Cothren, {C. Clay} and Brasel, {Karen J.} and Dicker, {Rochelle A.} and Bullard, {M. Kelley} and Haan, {James M.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Paul Harrison and Moore, {Forrest O.} and Martin Schreiber and Knudson, {M. Margaret} and Moore, {Ernest E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "1294--1301",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds

T2 - A western trauma association multicenter trial

AU - Biffl, Walter L.

AU - Kaups, Krista L.

AU - Cothren, C. Clay

AU - Brasel, Karen J.

AU - Dicker, Rochelle A.

AU - Bullard, M. Kelley

AU - Haan, James M.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Harrison, Paul

AU - Moore, Forrest O.

AU - Schreiber, Martin

AU - Knudson, M. Margaret

AU - Moore, Ernest E.

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - Background: The optimal management of hemodynamically stable, asymptomatic patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains controversial. The goal is to identify and treat injuries in a safe, cost-effective manner. Common evaluation strategies include local wound exploration (LWE)/diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), serial clinical assessments (SCAs), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical course of patients managed by the various strategies, to determine whether there are differences in associated nontherapeutic laparotomy (NONTHER LAP), emergency department (ED) discharge, or complication rates. Methods: A multicenter, Institutional Review Board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was individualized according to surgeon/institutional protocols. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively. Results: Three hundred fifty -nine patients were studied. Eighty-one had indications for immediate LAP, of which 84% were therapeutic. ED D/C was facilitated by LWE, CT, and DPL in 23%, 21%, and 16% of patients, respectively. On the other hand, LAP based on abnormalities on LWE, CT, and DPL were NONTHER in 57%, 24%, and 31% of patients, respectively. Twelve percent of patients selected for SCA ultimately had LAP (33% were NONTHER); there was no apparent morbidity due to delay in intervention. Conclusions: Shock, evisceration, and peritonitis warrant immediate LAP after AASW. Patients without these findings can be safely observed for signs or symptoms of bleeding or hollow viscus injury. To limit the number of hospital admissions, we propose a uniform strategy using LWE to ascertain the depth of penetration; the patient may be safely discharged in the absence of peritoneal violation. Peritoneal penetration, absent evidence of ongoing hemorrhage or hollow viscus injury, should not be considered an indication for LAP, but rather an indication for admission for SCAs. We suggest that a prospective multicenter trial be performed to document the safety and cost-effectiveness of such an approach.

AB - Background: The optimal management of hemodynamically stable, asymptomatic patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains controversial. The goal is to identify and treat injuries in a safe, cost-effective manner. Common evaluation strategies include local wound exploration (LWE)/diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), serial clinical assessments (SCAs), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical course of patients managed by the various strategies, to determine whether there are differences in associated nontherapeutic laparotomy (NONTHER LAP), emergency department (ED) discharge, or complication rates. Methods: A multicenter, Institutional Review Board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was individualized according to surgeon/institutional protocols. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively. Results: Three hundred fifty -nine patients were studied. Eighty-one had indications for immediate LAP, of which 84% were therapeutic. ED D/C was facilitated by LWE, CT, and DPL in 23%, 21%, and 16% of patients, respectively. On the other hand, LAP based on abnormalities on LWE, CT, and DPL were NONTHER in 57%, 24%, and 31% of patients, respectively. Twelve percent of patients selected for SCA ultimately had LAP (33% were NONTHER); there was no apparent morbidity due to delay in intervention. Conclusions: Shock, evisceration, and peritonitis warrant immediate LAP after AASW. Patients without these findings can be safely observed for signs or symptoms of bleeding or hollow viscus injury. To limit the number of hospital admissions, we propose a uniform strategy using LWE to ascertain the depth of penetration; the patient may be safely discharged in the absence of peritoneal violation. Peritoneal penetration, absent evidence of ongoing hemorrhage or hollow viscus injury, should not be considered an indication for LAP, but rather an indication for admission for SCAs. We suggest that a prospective multicenter trial be performed to document the safety and cost-effectiveness of such an approach.

KW - Abdominal stab wounds

KW - Abdominal trauma

KW - Clinical assessments

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Computed tomography scan, serial

KW - Diagnostic peritoneal lavage

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Local wound exploration

KW - Multicenter

KW - Penetrating trauma

KW - Prospective

KW - Protocol

KW - Stab wounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649660017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649660017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 1294

EP - 1301

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -