Management Choices for Patients with "Squamous Atypia" on Papanicolaou Smear a Toss Up?

Joy Melnikow, James Nuovo, Mary Paliescheskey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Appropriate management of borderline abnormalities on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. This decision analysis compared two strategies for management of women with the Pap smear result of "squamous atypia." A policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy was compared with repeating the cervical smear at 6-month intervals. Relevant probabilities and ranges were extracted from published studies in the English language medical literature from 1966 to 1993. When no relevant studies could be located, probabilities with a plausible range were determined through consensus of a panel of experts. Outcome values were assigned for the analysis to contrast the probabilities of not being diagnosed with invasive cancer by the end of the time period (approximately 2 years) covered by the analysis. Using baseline estimates, either policy resulted in an essentially equivalent probability of invasive cervical cancer. The estimated likelihood of remaining free of invasive cervical cancer was .9974 for follow-up by repeat smear versus .9976 for immediate colposcopy and biopsy. In sensitivity analysis, very high probabilities of progression to invasive cervical cancer favored the policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy. Follow-up of squamous atypia on cervical smear by repeating the smear at 6-month intervals is unlikely to result in a detectable increase in invasive cervical cancers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-347
Number of pages12
JournalMedical Care
Volume34
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1996

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Colposcopy
management
Vaginal Smears
Biopsy
Decision Support Techniques
English language
Consensus
Language
expert
Values
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cervix neoplasm
  • Decision analysis
  • Vaginal smear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Management Choices for Patients with "Squamous Atypia" on Papanicolaou Smear a Toss Up? / Melnikow, Joy; Nuovo, James; Paliescheskey, Mary.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 34, No. 4, 04.1996, p. 336-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0952e261b81149b59f689c6d0b063f87,
title = "Management Choices for Patients with {"}Squamous Atypia{"} on Papanicolaou Smear a Toss Up?",
abstract = "Appropriate management of borderline abnormalities on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. This decision analysis compared two strategies for management of women with the Pap smear result of {"}squamous atypia.{"} A policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy was compared with repeating the cervical smear at 6-month intervals. Relevant probabilities and ranges were extracted from published studies in the English language medical literature from 1966 to 1993. When no relevant studies could be located, probabilities with a plausible range were determined through consensus of a panel of experts. Outcome values were assigned for the analysis to contrast the probabilities of not being diagnosed with invasive cancer by the end of the time period (approximately 2 years) covered by the analysis. Using baseline estimates, either policy resulted in an essentially equivalent probability of invasive cervical cancer. The estimated likelihood of remaining free of invasive cervical cancer was .9974 for follow-up by repeat smear versus .9976 for immediate colposcopy and biopsy. In sensitivity analysis, very high probabilities of progression to invasive cervical cancer favored the policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy. Follow-up of squamous atypia on cervical smear by repeating the smear at 6-month intervals is unlikely to result in a detectable increase in invasive cervical cancers.",
keywords = "Cervix neoplasm, Decision analysis, Vaginal smear",
author = "Joy Melnikow and James Nuovo and Mary Paliescheskey",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "336--347",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management Choices for Patients with "Squamous Atypia" on Papanicolaou Smear a Toss Up?

AU - Melnikow, Joy

AU - Nuovo, James

AU - Paliescheskey, Mary

PY - 1996/4

Y1 - 1996/4

N2 - Appropriate management of borderline abnormalities on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. This decision analysis compared two strategies for management of women with the Pap smear result of "squamous atypia." A policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy was compared with repeating the cervical smear at 6-month intervals. Relevant probabilities and ranges were extracted from published studies in the English language medical literature from 1966 to 1993. When no relevant studies could be located, probabilities with a plausible range were determined through consensus of a panel of experts. Outcome values were assigned for the analysis to contrast the probabilities of not being diagnosed with invasive cancer by the end of the time period (approximately 2 years) covered by the analysis. Using baseline estimates, either policy resulted in an essentially equivalent probability of invasive cervical cancer. The estimated likelihood of remaining free of invasive cervical cancer was .9974 for follow-up by repeat smear versus .9976 for immediate colposcopy and biopsy. In sensitivity analysis, very high probabilities of progression to invasive cervical cancer favored the policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy. Follow-up of squamous atypia on cervical smear by repeating the smear at 6-month intervals is unlikely to result in a detectable increase in invasive cervical cancers.

AB - Appropriate management of borderline abnormalities on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. This decision analysis compared two strategies for management of women with the Pap smear result of "squamous atypia." A policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy was compared with repeating the cervical smear at 6-month intervals. Relevant probabilities and ranges were extracted from published studies in the English language medical literature from 1966 to 1993. When no relevant studies could be located, probabilities with a plausible range were determined through consensus of a panel of experts. Outcome values were assigned for the analysis to contrast the probabilities of not being diagnosed with invasive cancer by the end of the time period (approximately 2 years) covered by the analysis. Using baseline estimates, either policy resulted in an essentially equivalent probability of invasive cervical cancer. The estimated likelihood of remaining free of invasive cervical cancer was .9974 for follow-up by repeat smear versus .9976 for immediate colposcopy and biopsy. In sensitivity analysis, very high probabilities of progression to invasive cervical cancer favored the policy of immediate colposcopy and biopsy. Follow-up of squamous atypia on cervical smear by repeating the smear at 6-month intervals is unlikely to result in a detectable increase in invasive cervical cancers.

KW - Cervix neoplasm

KW - Decision analysis

KW - Vaginal smear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030115905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030115905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8606558

AN - SCOPUS:0030115905

VL - 34

SP - 336

EP - 347

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 4

ER -