Malingering in a correctional setting: The use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample

Barbara E McDermott, Gregory Sokolov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to detect malingering in the correctional setting is of paramount importance. The burgeoning jail and prison population combined with statutory requirements for the provision of mental health treatment require that only those most in need receive these services. Several structured assessments have been developed to assist in the identification of individuals more likely to be feigning psychiatric symptoms. Prior to the development of these specialized assessments, subscales of standard psychological tests were used as an indicator of assessment attitudes, for both malingering and other dissimulation. At the Sacramento County (CA) Jail, the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) is routinely administered when clinicians feel there is a possibility that an inmate receiving psychiatric services may be feigning or exaggerating his/ her symptoms. Our study examined data from these evaluations of inmates in conjunction with other clinical data (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis, educational level) to determine those factors most associated with malingering in jail inmates. Our results indicate that the prevalence of malingering in our sample was quite high: over 66% were found to be malingering based on the scoring criteria for the SIRS. Inmates diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder were nomorelikely to feign symptomsthan inmates without this diagnosis. Inmates designated as malingering in their charts were no more likely to be found malingering on the SIRS, suggesting that they may have adopted an effective strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)753-765
Number of pages13
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Malingering
Interviews
interview
personality disorder
correctional institution
Psychiatry
mental health
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Psychological Tests
ability
Aptitude
evaluation
Prisons
Mental Disorders
Mental Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Malingering in a correctional setting : The use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample. / McDermott, Barbara E; Sokolov, Gregory.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 27, No. 5, 09.2009, p. 753-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4d424e8ceb64c259fcf5fc15f153de7,
title = "Malingering in a correctional setting: The use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample",
abstract = "The ability to detect malingering in the correctional setting is of paramount importance. The burgeoning jail and prison population combined with statutory requirements for the provision of mental health treatment require that only those most in need receive these services. Several structured assessments have been developed to assist in the identification of individuals more likely to be feigning psychiatric symptoms. Prior to the development of these specialized assessments, subscales of standard psychological tests were used as an indicator of assessment attitudes, for both malingering and other dissimulation. At the Sacramento County (CA) Jail, the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) is routinely administered when clinicians feel there is a possibility that an inmate receiving psychiatric services may be feigning or exaggerating his/ her symptoms. Our study examined data from these evaluations of inmates in conjunction with other clinical data (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis, educational level) to determine those factors most associated with malingering in jail inmates. Our results indicate that the prevalence of malingering in our sample was quite high: over 66{\%} were found to be malingering based on the scoring criteria for the SIRS. Inmates diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder were nomorelikely to feign symptomsthan inmates without this diagnosis. Inmates designated as malingering in their charts were no more likely to be found malingering on the SIRS, suggesting that they may have adopted an effective strategy.",
author = "McDermott, {Barbara E} and Gregory Sokolov",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.892",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "753--765",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Malingering in a correctional setting

T2 - The use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample

AU - McDermott, Barbara E

AU - Sokolov, Gregory

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - The ability to detect malingering in the correctional setting is of paramount importance. The burgeoning jail and prison population combined with statutory requirements for the provision of mental health treatment require that only those most in need receive these services. Several structured assessments have been developed to assist in the identification of individuals more likely to be feigning psychiatric symptoms. Prior to the development of these specialized assessments, subscales of standard psychological tests were used as an indicator of assessment attitudes, for both malingering and other dissimulation. At the Sacramento County (CA) Jail, the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) is routinely administered when clinicians feel there is a possibility that an inmate receiving psychiatric services may be feigning or exaggerating his/ her symptoms. Our study examined data from these evaluations of inmates in conjunction with other clinical data (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis, educational level) to determine those factors most associated with malingering in jail inmates. Our results indicate that the prevalence of malingering in our sample was quite high: over 66% were found to be malingering based on the scoring criteria for the SIRS. Inmates diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder were nomorelikely to feign symptomsthan inmates without this diagnosis. Inmates designated as malingering in their charts were no more likely to be found malingering on the SIRS, suggesting that they may have adopted an effective strategy.

AB - The ability to detect malingering in the correctional setting is of paramount importance. The burgeoning jail and prison population combined with statutory requirements for the provision of mental health treatment require that only those most in need receive these services. Several structured assessments have been developed to assist in the identification of individuals more likely to be feigning psychiatric symptoms. Prior to the development of these specialized assessments, subscales of standard psychological tests were used as an indicator of assessment attitudes, for both malingering and other dissimulation. At the Sacramento County (CA) Jail, the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) is routinely administered when clinicians feel there is a possibility that an inmate receiving psychiatric services may be feigning or exaggerating his/ her symptoms. Our study examined data from these evaluations of inmates in conjunction with other clinical data (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis, educational level) to determine those factors most associated with malingering in jail inmates. Our results indicate that the prevalence of malingering in our sample was quite high: over 66% were found to be malingering based on the scoring criteria for the SIRS. Inmates diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder were nomorelikely to feign symptomsthan inmates without this diagnosis. Inmates designated as malingering in their charts were no more likely to be found malingering on the SIRS, suggesting that they may have adopted an effective strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350588972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350588972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.892

DO - 10.1002/bsl.892

M3 - Article

C2 - 19743514

AN - SCOPUS:70350588972

VL - 27

SP - 753

EP - 765

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 5

ER -