Male Victims of partner violence: Prevalence and accuracy of screening tools

Trevor Mills, Jennifer L. Avegno, Micelle J. Haydel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of two brief surveys for detection of male victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) in the Emergency Department (ED). This study was conducted prospectively in an urban, teaching hospital over 6 weeks; all men triaged to the acute care portion of the ED were eligible for enrollment. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, refusal, altered mental status, or condition requiring lifesaving intervention. Data included demographics, Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) score, and scores on two brief surveys of IPV: the HITS ("Hurt/Insult/Threaten/Scream") scale and the Partner Violence Screen (PVS). The CTS2 uses previously validated population scores for female to male psychological aggression and physical assault. Neither the HITS nor the PVS has been validated for use in the ED for detecting male victims of IPV. There were 116 men approached for enrollment; nearly half completed all surveys. Mean age was 41.8 years, and the sample was 73% African-American and 20% white. Thirty-nine percent had positive scores on the psychological aggression portion of the CTS2, whereas 20% had positive scores on the physical assault subscale. Comparing the HITS and PVS to both the psychological and physical portions of the CTS2 resulted in sensitivities of 30-45% and specificities of 83-88%. False negative rates on the two brief surveys ranged from 14-33%, and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratios were low. Neither the HITS nor the PVS accurately screens male victims of IPV in the ED. Further research is needed to develop a valid, brief screening test to identify male victims of IPV in an acute setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-452
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Violence
Hospital Emergency Service
Psychology
Aggression
Urban Hospitals
Teaching Hospitals
African Americans
Demography
Intimate Partner Violence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research
Population

Keywords

  • demographics
  • disease prevalence
  • intimate partner violence
  • screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Male Victims of partner violence : Prevalence and accuracy of screening tools. / Mills, Trevor; Avegno, Jennifer L.; Haydel, Micelle J.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.11.2006, p. 447-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mills, Trevor ; Avegno, Jennifer L. ; Haydel, Micelle J. / Male Victims of partner violence : Prevalence and accuracy of screening tools. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 447-452.
@article{eade58b0b3d4444295f6a63c9f9b90c4,
title = "Male Victims of partner violence: Prevalence and accuracy of screening tools",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of two brief surveys for detection of male victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) in the Emergency Department (ED). This study was conducted prospectively in an urban, teaching hospital over 6 weeks; all men triaged to the acute care portion of the ED were eligible for enrollment. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, refusal, altered mental status, or condition requiring lifesaving intervention. Data included demographics, Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) score, and scores on two brief surveys of IPV: the HITS ({"}Hurt/Insult/Threaten/Scream{"}) scale and the Partner Violence Screen (PVS). The CTS2 uses previously validated population scores for female to male psychological aggression and physical assault. Neither the HITS nor the PVS has been validated for use in the ED for detecting male victims of IPV. There were 116 men approached for enrollment; nearly half completed all surveys. Mean age was 41.8 years, and the sample was 73{\%} African-American and 20{\%} white. Thirty-nine percent had positive scores on the psychological aggression portion of the CTS2, whereas 20{\%} had positive scores on the physical assault subscale. Comparing the HITS and PVS to both the psychological and physical portions of the CTS2 resulted in sensitivities of 30-45{\%} and specificities of 83-88{\%}. False negative rates on the two brief surveys ranged from 14-33{\%}, and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratios were low. Neither the HITS nor the PVS accurately screens male victims of IPV in the ED. Further research is needed to develop a valid, brief screening test to identify male victims of IPV in an acute setting.",
keywords = "demographics, disease prevalence, intimate partner violence, screening",
author = "Trevor Mills and Avegno, {Jennifer L.} and Haydel, {Micelle J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.12.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "447--452",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Male Victims of partner violence

T2 - Prevalence and accuracy of screening tools

AU - Mills, Trevor

AU - Avegno, Jennifer L.

AU - Haydel, Micelle J.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of two brief surveys for detection of male victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) in the Emergency Department (ED). This study was conducted prospectively in an urban, teaching hospital over 6 weeks; all men triaged to the acute care portion of the ED were eligible for enrollment. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, refusal, altered mental status, or condition requiring lifesaving intervention. Data included demographics, Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) score, and scores on two brief surveys of IPV: the HITS ("Hurt/Insult/Threaten/Scream") scale and the Partner Violence Screen (PVS). The CTS2 uses previously validated population scores for female to male psychological aggression and physical assault. Neither the HITS nor the PVS has been validated for use in the ED for detecting male victims of IPV. There were 116 men approached for enrollment; nearly half completed all surveys. Mean age was 41.8 years, and the sample was 73% African-American and 20% white. Thirty-nine percent had positive scores on the psychological aggression portion of the CTS2, whereas 20% had positive scores on the physical assault subscale. Comparing the HITS and PVS to both the psychological and physical portions of the CTS2 resulted in sensitivities of 30-45% and specificities of 83-88%. False negative rates on the two brief surveys ranged from 14-33%, and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratios were low. Neither the HITS nor the PVS accurately screens male victims of IPV in the ED. Further research is needed to develop a valid, brief screening test to identify male victims of IPV in an acute setting.

AB - The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of two brief surveys for detection of male victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) in the Emergency Department (ED). This study was conducted prospectively in an urban, teaching hospital over 6 weeks; all men triaged to the acute care portion of the ED were eligible for enrollment. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, refusal, altered mental status, or condition requiring lifesaving intervention. Data included demographics, Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) score, and scores on two brief surveys of IPV: the HITS ("Hurt/Insult/Threaten/Scream") scale and the Partner Violence Screen (PVS). The CTS2 uses previously validated population scores for female to male psychological aggression and physical assault. Neither the HITS nor the PVS has been validated for use in the ED for detecting male victims of IPV. There were 116 men approached for enrollment; nearly half completed all surveys. Mean age was 41.8 years, and the sample was 73% African-American and 20% white. Thirty-nine percent had positive scores on the psychological aggression portion of the CTS2, whereas 20% had positive scores on the physical assault subscale. Comparing the HITS and PVS to both the psychological and physical portions of the CTS2 resulted in sensitivities of 30-45% and specificities of 83-88%. False negative rates on the two brief surveys ranged from 14-33%, and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratios were low. Neither the HITS nor the PVS accurately screens male victims of IPV in the ED. Further research is needed to develop a valid, brief screening test to identify male victims of IPV in an acute setting.

KW - demographics

KW - disease prevalence

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749531894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749531894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.12.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.12.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 17046494

AN - SCOPUS:33749531894

VL - 31

SP - 447

EP - 452

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 4

ER -