Maintenance of certification: Update on attitudes of members of the American Society of Neuroradiology

David M. Yousem, A. Nidecker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroradiology is in the fifth year of subspecialty recertification. New requirements for the MOC process include a PQI initiative. The purpose of this report was to survey compliance of ASNR members with the MOC process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-question Internet-based survey was sent to the 2864 members of the ASNR through e-mail addresses. The survey asked questions regarding compliance with cognitive testing, SAMs, CME credits, and PQI. Multiple reminders were sent and open comments graded for attitudes toward the MOC process. RESULTS: While most respondents were engaged in the MOC process (878/1074 [81.8%]) and were aware of CME and SAMs, (736/1067 [69%]) and cognitive testing requirements of the recertification, the PQI initiative had limited participation and many questions about the component. Of the 1057 respondents, 687 (490 not started, 87 registered but not started, 110 unaware of PQI) or 65% had not started a PQI project at the time of the survey. The ASNR was asked to help with the cognitive examination by 25 (4.4%), CME offerings by 53 (9.4%), SAM modules by 88 (14.0%), and PQI projects by 205 (36.2%) respondents. Open comments were generally unfavorable toward the MOC-PQI process by a 3:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the MOC process has improved since a prior survey 3 years ago; however, confusion over the PQI process remains the primary concern of ASNR members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1369-1372
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Certification
Maintenance
compound A 12
Surveys and Questionnaires
Postal Service
Internet
Compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Maintenance of certification : Update on attitudes of members of the American Society of Neuroradiology. / Yousem, David M.; Nidecker, A.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 31, No. 8, 09.2010, p. 1369-1372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3266832b1b549598ca1afa75a168376,
title = "Maintenance of certification: Update on attitudes of members of the American Society of Neuroradiology",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroradiology is in the fifth year of subspecialty recertification. New requirements for the MOC process include a PQI initiative. The purpose of this report was to survey compliance of ASNR members with the MOC process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-question Internet-based survey was sent to the 2864 members of the ASNR through e-mail addresses. The survey asked questions regarding compliance with cognitive testing, SAMs, CME credits, and PQI. Multiple reminders were sent and open comments graded for attitudes toward the MOC process. RESULTS: While most respondents were engaged in the MOC process (878/1074 [81.8{\%}]) and were aware of CME and SAMs, (736/1067 [69{\%}]) and cognitive testing requirements of the recertification, the PQI initiative had limited participation and many questions about the component. Of the 1057 respondents, 687 (490 not started, 87 registered but not started, 110 unaware of PQI) or 65{\%} had not started a PQI project at the time of the survey. The ASNR was asked to help with the cognitive examination by 25 (4.4{\%}), CME offerings by 53 (9.4{\%}), SAM modules by 88 (14.0{\%}), and PQI projects by 205 (36.2{\%}) respondents. Open comments were generally unfavorable toward the MOC-PQI process by a 3:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the MOC process has improved since a prior survey 3 years ago; however, confusion over the PQI process remains the primary concern of ASNR members.",
author = "Yousem, {David M.} and A. Nidecker",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A2029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1369--1372",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maintenance of certification

T2 - Update on attitudes of members of the American Society of Neuroradiology

AU - Yousem, David M.

AU - Nidecker, A.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroradiology is in the fifth year of subspecialty recertification. New requirements for the MOC process include a PQI initiative. The purpose of this report was to survey compliance of ASNR members with the MOC process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-question Internet-based survey was sent to the 2864 members of the ASNR through e-mail addresses. The survey asked questions regarding compliance with cognitive testing, SAMs, CME credits, and PQI. Multiple reminders were sent and open comments graded for attitudes toward the MOC process. RESULTS: While most respondents were engaged in the MOC process (878/1074 [81.8%]) and were aware of CME and SAMs, (736/1067 [69%]) and cognitive testing requirements of the recertification, the PQI initiative had limited participation and many questions about the component. Of the 1057 respondents, 687 (490 not started, 87 registered but not started, 110 unaware of PQI) or 65% had not started a PQI project at the time of the survey. The ASNR was asked to help with the cognitive examination by 25 (4.4%), CME offerings by 53 (9.4%), SAM modules by 88 (14.0%), and PQI projects by 205 (36.2%) respondents. Open comments were generally unfavorable toward the MOC-PQI process by a 3:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the MOC process has improved since a prior survey 3 years ago; however, confusion over the PQI process remains the primary concern of ASNR members.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroradiology is in the fifth year of subspecialty recertification. New requirements for the MOC process include a PQI initiative. The purpose of this report was to survey compliance of ASNR members with the MOC process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-question Internet-based survey was sent to the 2864 members of the ASNR through e-mail addresses. The survey asked questions regarding compliance with cognitive testing, SAMs, CME credits, and PQI. Multiple reminders were sent and open comments graded for attitudes toward the MOC process. RESULTS: While most respondents were engaged in the MOC process (878/1074 [81.8%]) and were aware of CME and SAMs, (736/1067 [69%]) and cognitive testing requirements of the recertification, the PQI initiative had limited participation and many questions about the component. Of the 1057 respondents, 687 (490 not started, 87 registered but not started, 110 unaware of PQI) or 65% had not started a PQI project at the time of the survey. The ASNR was asked to help with the cognitive examination by 25 (4.4%), CME offerings by 53 (9.4%), SAM modules by 88 (14.0%), and PQI projects by 205 (36.2%) respondents. Open comments were generally unfavorable toward the MOC-PQI process by a 3:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the MOC process has improved since a prior survey 3 years ago; however, confusion over the PQI process remains the primary concern of ASNR members.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956574208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956574208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A2029

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A2029

M3 - Article

C2 - 20203112

AN - SCOPUS:77956574208

VL - 31

SP - 1369

EP - 1372

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 8

ER -