Maintaining tumor targeting accuracy in real-time motion compensation systems for respiration-induced tumor motion

Kathleen Malinowski, Thomas J. McAvoy, Rohini George, Sonja Dieterich, Warren D. D'Souza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine how best to time respiratory surrogate-based tumor motion model updates by comparing a novel technique based on external measurements alone to three direct measurement methods. Methods: Concurrently measured tumor and respiratory surrogate positions from 166 treatment fractions for lung or pancreas lesions were analyzed. Partial-least-squares regression models of tumor position from marker motion were created from the first six measurements in each dataset. Successive tumor localizations were obtained at a rate of once per minute on average. Model updates were timed according to four methods: never, respiratory surrogate-based (when metrics based on respiratory surrogate measurements exceeded confidence limits), error-based (when localization error ≥3 mm), and always (approximately once per minute). Results: Radial tumor displacement prediction errors (mean ± standard deviation) for the four schema described above were 2.4 ± 1.2, 1.9 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The never-update error was significantly larger than errors of the other methods. Mean update counts over 20 min were 0, 4, 9, and 24, respectively. Conclusions: The same improvement in tumor localization accuracy could be achieved through any of the three update methods, but significantly fewer updates were required when the respiratory surrogate method was utilized. This study establishes the feasibility of timing image acquisitions for updating respiratory surrogate models without direct tumor localization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number071709
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Respiration
Neoplasms
Feasibility Studies
Tumor Biomarkers
Least-Squares Analysis
Pancreas
Lung

Keywords

  • real-time motion compensation
  • respiratory motion
  • respiratory surrogates
  • statistical process control
  • tumor-localization accuracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Maintaining tumor targeting accuracy in real-time motion compensation systems for respiration-induced tumor motion. / Malinowski, Kathleen; McAvoy, Thomas J.; George, Rohini; Dieterich, Sonja; D'Souza, Warren D.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 7, 071709, 07.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malinowski, Kathleen ; McAvoy, Thomas J. ; George, Rohini ; Dieterich, Sonja ; D'Souza, Warren D. / Maintaining tumor targeting accuracy in real-time motion compensation systems for respiration-induced tumor motion. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 7.
@article{7d025c9706864e9aa44e2d6d3cee08c9,
title = "Maintaining tumor targeting accuracy in real-time motion compensation systems for respiration-induced tumor motion",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine how best to time respiratory surrogate-based tumor motion model updates by comparing a novel technique based on external measurements alone to three direct measurement methods. Methods: Concurrently measured tumor and respiratory surrogate positions from 166 treatment fractions for lung or pancreas lesions were analyzed. Partial-least-squares regression models of tumor position from marker motion were created from the first six measurements in each dataset. Successive tumor localizations were obtained at a rate of once per minute on average. Model updates were timed according to four methods: never, respiratory surrogate-based (when metrics based on respiratory surrogate measurements exceeded confidence limits), error-based (when localization error ≥3 mm), and always (approximately once per minute). Results: Radial tumor displacement prediction errors (mean ± standard deviation) for the four schema described above were 2.4 ± 1.2, 1.9 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The never-update error was significantly larger than errors of the other methods. Mean update counts over 20 min were 0, 4, 9, and 24, respectively. Conclusions: The same improvement in tumor localization accuracy could be achieved through any of the three update methods, but significantly fewer updates were required when the respiratory surrogate method was utilized. This study establishes the feasibility of timing image acquisitions for updating respiratory surrogate models without direct tumor localization.",
keywords = "real-time motion compensation, respiratory motion, respiratory surrogates, statistical process control, tumor-localization accuracy",
author = "Kathleen Malinowski and McAvoy, {Thomas J.} and Rohini George and Sonja Dieterich and D'Souza, {Warren D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1118/1.4808119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maintaining tumor targeting accuracy in real-time motion compensation systems for respiration-induced tumor motion

AU - Malinowski, Kathleen

AU - McAvoy, Thomas J.

AU - George, Rohini

AU - Dieterich, Sonja

AU - D'Souza, Warren D.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Purpose: To determine how best to time respiratory surrogate-based tumor motion model updates by comparing a novel technique based on external measurements alone to three direct measurement methods. Methods: Concurrently measured tumor and respiratory surrogate positions from 166 treatment fractions for lung or pancreas lesions were analyzed. Partial-least-squares regression models of tumor position from marker motion were created from the first six measurements in each dataset. Successive tumor localizations were obtained at a rate of once per minute on average. Model updates were timed according to four methods: never, respiratory surrogate-based (when metrics based on respiratory surrogate measurements exceeded confidence limits), error-based (when localization error ≥3 mm), and always (approximately once per minute). Results: Radial tumor displacement prediction errors (mean ± standard deviation) for the four schema described above were 2.4 ± 1.2, 1.9 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The never-update error was significantly larger than errors of the other methods. Mean update counts over 20 min were 0, 4, 9, and 24, respectively. Conclusions: The same improvement in tumor localization accuracy could be achieved through any of the three update methods, but significantly fewer updates were required when the respiratory surrogate method was utilized. This study establishes the feasibility of timing image acquisitions for updating respiratory surrogate models without direct tumor localization.

AB - Purpose: To determine how best to time respiratory surrogate-based tumor motion model updates by comparing a novel technique based on external measurements alone to three direct measurement methods. Methods: Concurrently measured tumor and respiratory surrogate positions from 166 treatment fractions for lung or pancreas lesions were analyzed. Partial-least-squares regression models of tumor position from marker motion were created from the first six measurements in each dataset. Successive tumor localizations were obtained at a rate of once per minute on average. Model updates were timed according to four methods: never, respiratory surrogate-based (when metrics based on respiratory surrogate measurements exceeded confidence limits), error-based (when localization error ≥3 mm), and always (approximately once per minute). Results: Radial tumor displacement prediction errors (mean ± standard deviation) for the four schema described above were 2.4 ± 1.2, 1.9 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The never-update error was significantly larger than errors of the other methods. Mean update counts over 20 min were 0, 4, 9, and 24, respectively. Conclusions: The same improvement in tumor localization accuracy could be achieved through any of the three update methods, but significantly fewer updates were required when the respiratory surrogate method was utilized. This study establishes the feasibility of timing image acquisitions for updating respiratory surrogate models without direct tumor localization.

KW - real-time motion compensation

KW - respiratory motion

KW - respiratory surrogates

KW - statistical process control

KW - tumor-localization accuracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880234009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880234009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4808119

DO - 10.1118/1.4808119

M3 - Article

C2 - 23822413

AN - SCOPUS:84880234009

VL - 40

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 7

M1 - 071709

ER -