TY - JOUR
T1 - Low Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Failure Rate With Combined Anterior and Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation
AU - Shieh, Alvin K.
AU - Hayes, Christopher B.
AU - Shelton, Trevor J.
AU - Chip Routt, Milton L.
AU - Eastman, Jonathan G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine whether fracture pattern, implant size, fixation direction, or the amount of posterior pelvic ring fixation influences superior ramus medullary screw fixation failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review. SETTING: Regional Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: After exclusion criteria, 95 patients with 111 superior ramus fractures with 3 months minimum follow-up were included. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent anterior and posterior pelvic ring fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of immediate postoperative radiographs and/or computer tomography scan with the latest postoperative image to calculate interval fracture displacement and implant position. Postoperative fracture displacement or implant position change greater than 1 cm were considered fixation failures. RESULTS: Five screws were defined as failures (4.5%), including 3 retrograde, 3 with bicortical fixation, 4 with a 4.5-mm screw, and 1 with a 7.0-mm screw. Fracture patterns included 2 oblique and 3 comminuted fractures. Based on the Nakatani classification, there were 3 zone II, 1 zone I, and 1 zone III. Failure modes included 3 with cut-out along the screw head and 1 cut-out and 1 cut-through at the screw tip. CONCLUSIONS: Our incidence of superior pubic ramus intramedullary screw fixation failure was 4.5%. Even with anterior and posterior fixation along with precise technique, failures still occur without a common failure predictor. The percutaneous advantages and proven strength provided by an intramedullary implant make it desirable to help reestablish global pelvic ring stability. Biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to further understand intramedullary superior ramus screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine whether fracture pattern, implant size, fixation direction, or the amount of posterior pelvic ring fixation influences superior ramus medullary screw fixation failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review. SETTING: Regional Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: After exclusion criteria, 95 patients with 111 superior ramus fractures with 3 months minimum follow-up were included. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent anterior and posterior pelvic ring fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of immediate postoperative radiographs and/or computer tomography scan with the latest postoperative image to calculate interval fracture displacement and implant position. Postoperative fracture displacement or implant position change greater than 1 cm were considered fixation failures. RESULTS: Five screws were defined as failures (4.5%), including 3 retrograde, 3 with bicortical fixation, 4 with a 4.5-mm screw, and 1 with a 7.0-mm screw. Fracture patterns included 2 oblique and 3 comminuted fractures. Based on the Nakatani classification, there were 3 zone II, 1 zone I, and 1 zone III. Failure modes included 3 with cut-out along the screw head and 1 cut-out and 1 cut-through at the screw tip. CONCLUSIONS: Our incidence of superior pubic ramus intramedullary screw fixation failure was 4.5%. Even with anterior and posterior fixation along with precise technique, failures still occur without a common failure predictor. The percutaneous advantages and proven strength provided by an intramedullary implant make it desirable to help reestablish global pelvic ring stability. Biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to further understand intramedullary superior ramus screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103227491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103227491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001942
DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001942
M3 - Article
C2 - 33079844
AN - SCOPUS:85103227491
VL - 35
SP - 175
EP - 180
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
SN - 0890-5339
IS - 4
ER -