Abstract
The economic impact of elephants, Loxodonta africana, and predators, particularly lions, Panthera leo, on rural agriculturists in the Kwando region of the East Caprivi, Namibia was assessed from the years 1991 to 1995. Elephants were responsible for the greatest number of wildlife conflicts in the region, while lions had the greatest financial impact on farmers. Attempts were made to reduce conflicts between elephants and farmers using deterrents such as electrical fencing, trip-alarm techniques and elephant warning calls. Success of deterrents depended on the frequency of exposure to elephants, maintenance and the ecology of both humans and elephants in the region. Of the deterrent strategies explored, only electrical fencing reduced elephant damage at the community level. The future efficacy of electric fencing is uncertain, however, if elephants do not associate it with fear and possible death. Deterrent efforts played a role in improving relations between communities and conservationists. Scenarios for how human agricultural communities might co-exist with free-ranging elephants are discussed. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 381-391 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Biological Conservation |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2000 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Agriculture
- Community-based conservation
- Elephant
- Lion
- Wildlife conflicts
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
Cite this
Living with the modern conservation paradigm : Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East Caprivi, Namibia. / O'Connell-Rodwell, Caitlin E.; Rodwell, Timothy; Rice, Matthew; Hart, Lynette A.
In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 93, No. 3, 05.2000, p. 381-391.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Living with the modern conservation paradigm
T2 - Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East Caprivi, Namibia
AU - O'Connell-Rodwell, Caitlin E.
AU - Rodwell, Timothy
AU - Rice, Matthew
AU - Hart, Lynette A
PY - 2000/5
Y1 - 2000/5
N2 - The economic impact of elephants, Loxodonta africana, and predators, particularly lions, Panthera leo, on rural agriculturists in the Kwando region of the East Caprivi, Namibia was assessed from the years 1991 to 1995. Elephants were responsible for the greatest number of wildlife conflicts in the region, while lions had the greatest financial impact on farmers. Attempts were made to reduce conflicts between elephants and farmers using deterrents such as electrical fencing, trip-alarm techniques and elephant warning calls. Success of deterrents depended on the frequency of exposure to elephants, maintenance and the ecology of both humans and elephants in the region. Of the deterrent strategies explored, only electrical fencing reduced elephant damage at the community level. The future efficacy of electric fencing is uncertain, however, if elephants do not associate it with fear and possible death. Deterrent efforts played a role in improving relations between communities and conservationists. Scenarios for how human agricultural communities might co-exist with free-ranging elephants are discussed. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
AB - The economic impact of elephants, Loxodonta africana, and predators, particularly lions, Panthera leo, on rural agriculturists in the Kwando region of the East Caprivi, Namibia was assessed from the years 1991 to 1995. Elephants were responsible for the greatest number of wildlife conflicts in the region, while lions had the greatest financial impact on farmers. Attempts were made to reduce conflicts between elephants and farmers using deterrents such as electrical fencing, trip-alarm techniques and elephant warning calls. Success of deterrents depended on the frequency of exposure to elephants, maintenance and the ecology of both humans and elephants in the region. Of the deterrent strategies explored, only electrical fencing reduced elephant damage at the community level. The future efficacy of electric fencing is uncertain, however, if elephants do not associate it with fear and possible death. Deterrent efforts played a role in improving relations between communities and conservationists. Scenarios for how human agricultural communities might co-exist with free-ranging elephants are discussed. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
KW - Agriculture
KW - Community-based conservation
KW - Elephant
KW - Lion
KW - Wildlife conflicts
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034005524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034005524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00108-1
DO - 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00108-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034005524
VL - 93
SP - 381
EP - 391
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
SN - 0006-3207
IS - 3
ER -