Liver resection and laser hyperthermia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Table 2 provides a comparison of these interstitial and in situ techniques, assessing several criteria and utilizing and expanding on an excellent review by Masters et al. The rapid advance of technology and cross- fertilization between groups using different interstitial techniques will lead to a clear understanding of the benefits and limits of each. However, there is essentially no information at the present time to suggest that these techniques should be used in lieu of hepatic resection in an attempt to cure patients who are good operative risks. There are insufficient data of a controlled nature to determine that there has been a survival or palliative benefit in many of the patients so treated. Nevertheless, as it is clear that these treatments cause tissue destruction in an appropriate nonmorbid way and that they are well tolerated with low risk to the patients, it is entirely conceivable that interstitial techniques will replace hepatic resection in some instances in the future, particularly for lesions smaller than 3 cm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-639
Number of pages17
JournalSurgical Clinics of North America
Volume72
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Lasers
Fever
Liver
Fertilization
Technology
Survival
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Liver resection and laser hyperthermia. / Schneider, Philip D.

In: Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 72, No. 3, 1992, p. 623-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12a66729cc6949b2bf49b9e0115b2890,
title = "Liver resection and laser hyperthermia",
abstract = "Table 2 provides a comparison of these interstitial and in situ techniques, assessing several criteria and utilizing and expanding on an excellent review by Masters et al. The rapid advance of technology and cross- fertilization between groups using different interstitial techniques will lead to a clear understanding of the benefits and limits of each. However, there is essentially no information at the present time to suggest that these techniques should be used in lieu of hepatic resection in an attempt to cure patients who are good operative risks. There are insufficient data of a controlled nature to determine that there has been a survival or palliative benefit in many of the patients so treated. Nevertheless, as it is clear that these treatments cause tissue destruction in an appropriate nonmorbid way and that they are well tolerated with low risk to the patients, it is entirely conceivable that interstitial techniques will replace hepatic resection in some instances in the future, particularly for lesions smaller than 3 cm.",
author = "Schneider, {Philip D}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "623--639",
journal = "Surgical Clinics of North America",
issn = "0039-6109",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liver resection and laser hyperthermia

AU - Schneider, Philip D

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Table 2 provides a comparison of these interstitial and in situ techniques, assessing several criteria and utilizing and expanding on an excellent review by Masters et al. The rapid advance of technology and cross- fertilization between groups using different interstitial techniques will lead to a clear understanding of the benefits and limits of each. However, there is essentially no information at the present time to suggest that these techniques should be used in lieu of hepatic resection in an attempt to cure patients who are good operative risks. There are insufficient data of a controlled nature to determine that there has been a survival or palliative benefit in many of the patients so treated. Nevertheless, as it is clear that these treatments cause tissue destruction in an appropriate nonmorbid way and that they are well tolerated with low risk to the patients, it is entirely conceivable that interstitial techniques will replace hepatic resection in some instances in the future, particularly for lesions smaller than 3 cm.

AB - Table 2 provides a comparison of these interstitial and in situ techniques, assessing several criteria and utilizing and expanding on an excellent review by Masters et al. The rapid advance of technology and cross- fertilization between groups using different interstitial techniques will lead to a clear understanding of the benefits and limits of each. However, there is essentially no information at the present time to suggest that these techniques should be used in lieu of hepatic resection in an attempt to cure patients who are good operative risks. There are insufficient data of a controlled nature to determine that there has been a survival or palliative benefit in many of the patients so treated. Nevertheless, as it is clear that these treatments cause tissue destruction in an appropriate nonmorbid way and that they are well tolerated with low risk to the patients, it is entirely conceivable that interstitial techniques will replace hepatic resection in some instances in the future, particularly for lesions smaller than 3 cm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026719807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026719807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1589836

AN - SCOPUS:0026719807

VL - 72

SP - 623

EP - 639

JO - Surgical Clinics of North America

JF - Surgical Clinics of North America

SN - 0039-6109

IS - 3

ER -