Limiting computed tomography to patients with peritoneal lavage-positive results reduces cost and unnecessary celiotomies in blunt trauma

Martin A. Schreiber, Larry M. Gentilello, Peter Rhee, Gregory Jurkovich, Ronald V. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if computed tomographic (CT) scanning can be used to identify patients with blunt trauma, positive results of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and a stable hemodynamic status who could be managed safely and cost-effectively without celiotomy. Design: Patients with blunt trauma who required an abdominal evaluation underwent DPL. Patients with a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L (105/mm3) on lavage then underwent CT. Patients with solid organ injury alone, as detected on CT scan, were observed; those with evidence of hollow viscus injury underwent celiotomy. Results: Sixty-seven hemodynamically stable patients had a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L on DPL; 38 patients underwent subsequent CT scanning, and 29 underwent immediate celiotomy in violation of the protocol. Eleven patients in the protocol group ultimately underwent celiotomy. Overall, there were significantly fewer nontherapeutic celiotomies performed in the protocol group (2/38 vs 9/29, P<.01). There were no deaths in either group. Because DPL is less expensive than CT, limiting CT to patients with DPL-positive results and hemodynamic stability reduced the charges associated with abdominal evaluation by $580 594 over a period of 2 years. Conclusion: Limiting CT to the evaluation of patients with DPL- positive results and hemodynamic stability is safe, reduces charges, and results in a lower rate of non-therapeutic celiotomies compared with DPL alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)954-959
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume131
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Lavage
Tomography
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Erythrocyte Count
Hemodynamics
Viscera
Therapeutic Irrigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Limiting computed tomography to patients with peritoneal lavage-positive results reduces cost and unnecessary celiotomies in blunt trauma. / Schreiber, Martin A.; Gentilello, Larry M.; Rhee, Peter; Jurkovich, Gregory; Maier, Ronald V.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 131, No. 9, 01.01.1996, p. 954-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schreiber, Martin A. ; Gentilello, Larry M. ; Rhee, Peter ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Maier, Ronald V. / Limiting computed tomography to patients with peritoneal lavage-positive results reduces cost and unnecessary celiotomies in blunt trauma. In: Archives of Surgery. 1996 ; Vol. 131, No. 9. pp. 954-959.
@article{d62dc0177565466a93b255acb510a1ba,
title = "Limiting computed tomography to patients with peritoneal lavage-positive results reduces cost and unnecessary celiotomies in blunt trauma",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if computed tomographic (CT) scanning can be used to identify patients with blunt trauma, positive results of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and a stable hemodynamic status who could be managed safely and cost-effectively without celiotomy. Design: Patients with blunt trauma who required an abdominal evaluation underwent DPL. Patients with a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L (105/mm3) on lavage then underwent CT. Patients with solid organ injury alone, as detected on CT scan, were observed; those with evidence of hollow viscus injury underwent celiotomy. Results: Sixty-seven hemodynamically stable patients had a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L on DPL; 38 patients underwent subsequent CT scanning, and 29 underwent immediate celiotomy in violation of the protocol. Eleven patients in the protocol group ultimately underwent celiotomy. Overall, there were significantly fewer nontherapeutic celiotomies performed in the protocol group (2/38 vs 9/29, P<.01). There were no deaths in either group. Because DPL is less expensive than CT, limiting CT to patients with DPL-positive results and hemodynamic stability reduced the charges associated with abdominal evaluation by $580 594 over a period of 2 years. Conclusion: Limiting CT to the evaluation of patients with DPL- positive results and hemodynamic stability is safe, reduces charges, and results in a lower rate of non-therapeutic celiotomies compared with DPL alone.",
author = "Schreiber, {Martin A.} and Gentilello, {Larry M.} and Peter Rhee and Gregory Jurkovich and Maier, {Ronald V.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210052010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "954--959",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limiting computed tomography to patients with peritoneal lavage-positive results reduces cost and unnecessary celiotomies in blunt trauma

AU - Schreiber, Martin A.

AU - Gentilello, Larry M.

AU - Rhee, Peter

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine if computed tomographic (CT) scanning can be used to identify patients with blunt trauma, positive results of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and a stable hemodynamic status who could be managed safely and cost-effectively without celiotomy. Design: Patients with blunt trauma who required an abdominal evaluation underwent DPL. Patients with a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L (105/mm3) on lavage then underwent CT. Patients with solid organ injury alone, as detected on CT scan, were observed; those with evidence of hollow viscus injury underwent celiotomy. Results: Sixty-seven hemodynamically stable patients had a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L on DPL; 38 patients underwent subsequent CT scanning, and 29 underwent immediate celiotomy in violation of the protocol. Eleven patients in the protocol group ultimately underwent celiotomy. Overall, there were significantly fewer nontherapeutic celiotomies performed in the protocol group (2/38 vs 9/29, P<.01). There were no deaths in either group. Because DPL is less expensive than CT, limiting CT to patients with DPL-positive results and hemodynamic stability reduced the charges associated with abdominal evaluation by $580 594 over a period of 2 years. Conclusion: Limiting CT to the evaluation of patients with DPL- positive results and hemodynamic stability is safe, reduces charges, and results in a lower rate of non-therapeutic celiotomies compared with DPL alone.

AB - Objective: To determine if computed tomographic (CT) scanning can be used to identify patients with blunt trauma, positive results of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and a stable hemodynamic status who could be managed safely and cost-effectively without celiotomy. Design: Patients with blunt trauma who required an abdominal evaluation underwent DPL. Patients with a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L (105/mm3) on lavage then underwent CT. Patients with solid organ injury alone, as detected on CT scan, were observed; those with evidence of hollow viscus injury underwent celiotomy. Results: Sixty-seven hemodynamically stable patients had a red blood cell count greater than 1011/L on DPL; 38 patients underwent subsequent CT scanning, and 29 underwent immediate celiotomy in violation of the protocol. Eleven patients in the protocol group ultimately underwent celiotomy. Overall, there were significantly fewer nontherapeutic celiotomies performed in the protocol group (2/38 vs 9/29, P<.01). There were no deaths in either group. Because DPL is less expensive than CT, limiting CT to patients with DPL-positive results and hemodynamic stability reduced the charges associated with abdominal evaluation by $580 594 over a period of 2 years. Conclusion: Limiting CT to the evaluation of patients with DPL- positive results and hemodynamic stability is safe, reduces charges, and results in a lower rate of non-therapeutic celiotomies compared with DPL alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029781572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029781572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210052010

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210052010

M3 - Article

C2 - 8790181

AN - SCOPUS:0029781572

VL - 131

SP - 954

EP - 959

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -