Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States

Joshua Breslau, Kenneth S. Kendler, Maxwell Su, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Ronald C. Kessler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

329 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Recent research in the United States has demonstrated striking health disparities across ethnic groups. Despite a longstanding interest in ethnic disadvantage in psychiatric epidemiology, patterns of psychiatric morbidity across ethnic groups have never been examined in a nationally representative sample. Method. Ethnic differences in psychiatric morbidity are analyzed using data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). The three largest ethnic groups in the United States - Hispanics, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites - were compared with respect to lifetime risk and persistence of three categories of psychiatric disorder: mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder. Results. Where differences across ethnic groups were found in lifetime risk, socially disadvantaged groups had lower risk. Relative to Non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics had lower lifetime risk of substance use disorder and Non-Hispanic Blacks had lower lifetime risk of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. Where differences were found in persistence of disorders, disadvantaged groups had higher risk. Hispanics with mood disorders were more likely to be persistently ill as were Non-Hispanic Blacks with respect to both mood disorders and anxiety disorders. Closer examination found these differences to be generally consistent across population subgroups. Conclusions. Members of disadvantaged ethnic groups in the United States do not have an increased risk for psychiatric disorders. Members of these groups, however, do tend to have more persistent disorders. Future research should focus on explanations for these findings, including the possibility that these comparisons are biased, and on potential means of reducing the disparity in persistence of disorders across ethnic groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-327
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethnic Groups
Psychiatry
Vulnerable Populations
Mood Disorders
Hispanic Americans
Substance-Related Disorders
Anxiety Disorders
Morbidity
Comorbidity
Epidemiology
Anxiety
Health
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States. / Breslau, Joshua; Kendler, Kenneth S.; Su, Maxwell; Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio; Kessler, Ronald C.

In: Psychological Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 317-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Breslau, Joshua ; Kendler, Kenneth S. ; Su, Maxwell ; Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio ; Kessler, Ronald C. / Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States. In: Psychological Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 317-327.
@article{b5b06f9a7253405bb55aa01793e94c93,
title = "Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States",
abstract = "Background. Recent research in the United States has demonstrated striking health disparities across ethnic groups. Despite a longstanding interest in ethnic disadvantage in psychiatric epidemiology, patterns of psychiatric morbidity across ethnic groups have never been examined in a nationally representative sample. Method. Ethnic differences in psychiatric morbidity are analyzed using data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). The three largest ethnic groups in the United States - Hispanics, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites - were compared with respect to lifetime risk and persistence of three categories of psychiatric disorder: mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder. Results. Where differences across ethnic groups were found in lifetime risk, socially disadvantaged groups had lower risk. Relative to Non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics had lower lifetime risk of substance use disorder and Non-Hispanic Blacks had lower lifetime risk of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. Where differences were found in persistence of disorders, disadvantaged groups had higher risk. Hispanics with mood disorders were more likely to be persistently ill as were Non-Hispanic Blacks with respect to both mood disorders and anxiety disorders. Closer examination found these differences to be generally consistent across population subgroups. Conclusions. Members of disadvantaged ethnic groups in the United States do not have an increased risk for psychiatric disorders. Members of these groups, however, do tend to have more persistent disorders. Future research should focus on explanations for these findings, including the possibility that these comparisons are biased, and on potential means of reducing the disparity in persistence of disorders across ethnic groups.",
author = "Joshua Breslau and Kendler, {Kenneth S.} and Maxwell Su and Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola and Kessler, {Ronald C.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S0033291704003514",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "317--327",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States

AU - Breslau, Joshua

AU - Kendler, Kenneth S.

AU - Su, Maxwell

AU - Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio

AU - Kessler, Ronald C.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Background. Recent research in the United States has demonstrated striking health disparities across ethnic groups. Despite a longstanding interest in ethnic disadvantage in psychiatric epidemiology, patterns of psychiatric morbidity across ethnic groups have never been examined in a nationally representative sample. Method. Ethnic differences in psychiatric morbidity are analyzed using data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). The three largest ethnic groups in the United States - Hispanics, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites - were compared with respect to lifetime risk and persistence of three categories of psychiatric disorder: mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder. Results. Where differences across ethnic groups were found in lifetime risk, socially disadvantaged groups had lower risk. Relative to Non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics had lower lifetime risk of substance use disorder and Non-Hispanic Blacks had lower lifetime risk of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. Where differences were found in persistence of disorders, disadvantaged groups had higher risk. Hispanics with mood disorders were more likely to be persistently ill as were Non-Hispanic Blacks with respect to both mood disorders and anxiety disorders. Closer examination found these differences to be generally consistent across population subgroups. Conclusions. Members of disadvantaged ethnic groups in the United States do not have an increased risk for psychiatric disorders. Members of these groups, however, do tend to have more persistent disorders. Future research should focus on explanations for these findings, including the possibility that these comparisons are biased, and on potential means of reducing the disparity in persistence of disorders across ethnic groups.

AB - Background. Recent research in the United States has demonstrated striking health disparities across ethnic groups. Despite a longstanding interest in ethnic disadvantage in psychiatric epidemiology, patterns of psychiatric morbidity across ethnic groups have never been examined in a nationally representative sample. Method. Ethnic differences in psychiatric morbidity are analyzed using data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). The three largest ethnic groups in the United States - Hispanics, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites - were compared with respect to lifetime risk and persistence of three categories of psychiatric disorder: mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder. Results. Where differences across ethnic groups were found in lifetime risk, socially disadvantaged groups had lower risk. Relative to Non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics had lower lifetime risk of substance use disorder and Non-Hispanic Blacks had lower lifetime risk of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. Where differences were found in persistence of disorders, disadvantaged groups had higher risk. Hispanics with mood disorders were more likely to be persistently ill as were Non-Hispanic Blacks with respect to both mood disorders and anxiety disorders. Closer examination found these differences to be generally consistent across population subgroups. Conclusions. Members of disadvantaged ethnic groups in the United States do not have an increased risk for psychiatric disorders. Members of these groups, however, do tend to have more persistent disorders. Future research should focus on explanations for these findings, including the possibility that these comparisons are biased, and on potential means of reducing the disparity in persistence of disorders across ethnic groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14944360605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14944360605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291704003514

DO - 10.1017/S0033291704003514

M3 - Article

C2 - 15841868

AN - SCOPUS:14944360605

VL - 35

SP - 317

EP - 327

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 3

ER -