Laryngectomees' views on laryngeal transplantation

C. P S Potter, M. A. Birchall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Loss of a functional larynx has marked implications for quality of life that remain after both laryngectomy and its alternatives. One solution is laryngeal transplantation. We hypothesised that laryngeal transplantation would be unacceptable to a population of laryngectomees, and that such a lack of acceptability would not be affected by age, sex or time elapsed since operation. In addition, we sought the views of laryngectomees on priorities for research. A questionnaire was developed and mailed to 1000 members of laryngectomee clubs. A total of 372 of 404 responses were suitable for analysis. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they would accept a transplant under ideal conditions; the number dropped to 58.9% when a stoma was to be retained. Fifty percent would accept a graft even if it did not result in a normal voice. A positive response was more likely in younger respondents (P < 0.001 all questions; linear regression). Some 47.3% of respondents thought research money could be better spent on other projects, and this response was commoner in older respondents (P = 0.0001). Highest priorities for research into laryngeal cancer were development of new treatments (63.2%), prevention (60.2%) and optimisation of quality of life (57%). In short, there appears to be a surprisingly high level of support for laryngeal transplantation amongst those who have had a laryngectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-438
Number of pages6
JournalTransplant International
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transplantation
Laryngectomy
Research
Quality of Life
Transplants
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Larynx
Linear Models
Surveys and Questionnaires
Population

Keywords

  • Laryngectomy
  • Larynx transplantation
  • Questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Laryngectomees' views on laryngeal transplantation. / Potter, C. P S; Birchall, M. A.

In: Transplant International, Vol. 11, No. 6, 11.1998, p. 433-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Potter, C. P S ; Birchall, M. A. / Laryngectomees' views on laryngeal transplantation. In: Transplant International. 1998 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 433-438.
@article{8e42929755d9457fb6f8111960d93382,
title = "Laryngectomees' views on laryngeal transplantation",
abstract = "Loss of a functional larynx has marked implications for quality of life that remain after both laryngectomy and its alternatives. One solution is laryngeal transplantation. We hypothesised that laryngeal transplantation would be unacceptable to a population of laryngectomees, and that such a lack of acceptability would not be affected by age, sex or time elapsed since operation. In addition, we sought the views of laryngectomees on priorities for research. A questionnaire was developed and mailed to 1000 members of laryngectomee clubs. A total of 372 of 404 responses were suitable for analysis. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they would accept a transplant under ideal conditions; the number dropped to 58.9{\%} when a stoma was to be retained. Fifty percent would accept a graft even if it did not result in a normal voice. A positive response was more likely in younger respondents (P < 0.001 all questions; linear regression). Some 47.3{\%} of respondents thought research money could be better spent on other projects, and this response was commoner in older respondents (P = 0.0001). Highest priorities for research into laryngeal cancer were development of new treatments (63.2{\%}), prevention (60.2{\%}) and optimisation of quality of life (57{\%}). In short, there appears to be a surprisingly high level of support for laryngeal transplantation amongst those who have had a laryngectomy.",
keywords = "Laryngectomy, Larynx transplantation, Questionnaire",
author = "Potter, {C. P S} and Birchall, {M. A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s001470050170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "433--438",
journal = "Transplant International",
issn = "0934-0874",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laryngectomees' views on laryngeal transplantation

AU - Potter, C. P S

AU - Birchall, M. A.

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - Loss of a functional larynx has marked implications for quality of life that remain after both laryngectomy and its alternatives. One solution is laryngeal transplantation. We hypothesised that laryngeal transplantation would be unacceptable to a population of laryngectomees, and that such a lack of acceptability would not be affected by age, sex or time elapsed since operation. In addition, we sought the views of laryngectomees on priorities for research. A questionnaire was developed and mailed to 1000 members of laryngectomee clubs. A total of 372 of 404 responses were suitable for analysis. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they would accept a transplant under ideal conditions; the number dropped to 58.9% when a stoma was to be retained. Fifty percent would accept a graft even if it did not result in a normal voice. A positive response was more likely in younger respondents (P < 0.001 all questions; linear regression). Some 47.3% of respondents thought research money could be better spent on other projects, and this response was commoner in older respondents (P = 0.0001). Highest priorities for research into laryngeal cancer were development of new treatments (63.2%), prevention (60.2%) and optimisation of quality of life (57%). In short, there appears to be a surprisingly high level of support for laryngeal transplantation amongst those who have had a laryngectomy.

AB - Loss of a functional larynx has marked implications for quality of life that remain after both laryngectomy and its alternatives. One solution is laryngeal transplantation. We hypothesised that laryngeal transplantation would be unacceptable to a population of laryngectomees, and that such a lack of acceptability would not be affected by age, sex or time elapsed since operation. In addition, we sought the views of laryngectomees on priorities for research. A questionnaire was developed and mailed to 1000 members of laryngectomee clubs. A total of 372 of 404 responses were suitable for analysis. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they would accept a transplant under ideal conditions; the number dropped to 58.9% when a stoma was to be retained. Fifty percent would accept a graft even if it did not result in a normal voice. A positive response was more likely in younger respondents (P < 0.001 all questions; linear regression). Some 47.3% of respondents thought research money could be better spent on other projects, and this response was commoner in older respondents (P = 0.0001). Highest priorities for research into laryngeal cancer were development of new treatments (63.2%), prevention (60.2%) and optimisation of quality of life (57%). In short, there appears to be a surprisingly high level of support for laryngeal transplantation amongst those who have had a laryngectomy.

KW - Laryngectomy

KW - Larynx transplantation

KW - Questionnaire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031788745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031788745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s001470050170

DO - 10.1007/s001470050170

M3 - Article

C2 - 9870272

AN - SCOPUS:0031788745

VL - 11

SP - 433

EP - 438

JO - Transplant International

JF - Transplant International

SN - 0934-0874

IS - 6

ER -