It just happens

A qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning

Sonya Borrero, Cara Nikolajski, Julia R. Steinberg, Lori Freedman, Aletha Y. Akers, Said Ibrahim, Eleanor Schwarz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income women. We conducted a qualitative study with low-income women to better typologize pregnancy intention, understand the relationship between pregnancy intention and contraceptive use, and identify the contextual factors that shape pregnancy intention and contraceptive behavior. Study design Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, African-American and white women aged 18-45 recruited from reproductive health clinics in Pittsburgh, PA, to explore factors that influence women's pregnancy-related behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Results Among the 66 participants (36 African-American and 30 white), we identified several factors that may impede our public health goal of increasing the proportion of pregnancies that are consciously desired and planned. First, women do not always perceive that they have reproductive control and therefore do not necessarily formulate clear pregnancy intentions. Second, the benefits of a planned pregnancy may not be evident. Third, because preconception intention and planning do not necessarily occur, decisions about the acceptability of a pregnancy are often determined after the pregnancy has already occurred. Finally, even when women express a desire to avoid pregnancy, their contraceptive behaviors are not necessarily congruent with their desires. We also identified several clinically relevant and potentially modifiable factors that help to explain this intention-behavior discrepancy, including women's perceptions of low fecundity and their experiences with male partner contraceptive sabotage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the current conceptual framework that views pregnancy-related behaviors from a strict planned behavior perspective may be limited, particularly among low-income populations. Implications This study identified several cognitive and interpersonal pathways to unintended pregnancy among low-income women in Pittsburgh, PA, including perceptions of low reproductive control, perceptions of low fecundity and male partner reproductive coercion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-156
Number of pages7
JournalContraception
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Pregnancy
Contraception Behavior
African Americans
Fertility
Male Contraceptive Agents
Coercion
Reproductive Health
Family Planning Services
Poverty
Contraceptive Agents
Public Health
Interviews

Keywords

  • Pregnancy intention
  • Pregnancy planning
  • Race
  • Reproductive coercion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

It just happens : A qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning. / Borrero, Sonya; Nikolajski, Cara; Steinberg, Julia R.; Freedman, Lori; Akers, Aletha Y.; Ibrahim, Said; Schwarz, Eleanor.

In: Contraception, Vol. 91, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 150-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borrero, Sonya ; Nikolajski, Cara ; Steinberg, Julia R. ; Freedman, Lori ; Akers, Aletha Y. ; Ibrahim, Said ; Schwarz, Eleanor. / It just happens : A qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning. In: Contraception. 2015 ; Vol. 91, No. 2. pp. 150-156.
@article{7205ae65e9fb44f2aa04c923018c10a8,
title = "It just happens: A qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning",
abstract = "Objective Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income women. We conducted a qualitative study with low-income women to better typologize pregnancy intention, understand the relationship between pregnancy intention and contraceptive use, and identify the contextual factors that shape pregnancy intention and contraceptive behavior. Study design Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, African-American and white women aged 18-45 recruited from reproductive health clinics in Pittsburgh, PA, to explore factors that influence women's pregnancy-related behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Results Among the 66 participants (36 African-American and 30 white), we identified several factors that may impede our public health goal of increasing the proportion of pregnancies that are consciously desired and planned. First, women do not always perceive that they have reproductive control and therefore do not necessarily formulate clear pregnancy intentions. Second, the benefits of a planned pregnancy may not be evident. Third, because preconception intention and planning do not necessarily occur, decisions about the acceptability of a pregnancy are often determined after the pregnancy has already occurred. Finally, even when women express a desire to avoid pregnancy, their contraceptive behaviors are not necessarily congruent with their desires. We also identified several clinically relevant and potentially modifiable factors that help to explain this intention-behavior discrepancy, including women's perceptions of low fecundity and their experiences with male partner contraceptive sabotage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the current conceptual framework that views pregnancy-related behaviors from a strict planned behavior perspective may be limited, particularly among low-income populations. Implications This study identified several cognitive and interpersonal pathways to unintended pregnancy among low-income women in Pittsburgh, PA, including perceptions of low reproductive control, perceptions of low fecundity and male partner reproductive coercion.",
keywords = "Pregnancy intention, Pregnancy planning, Race, Reproductive coercion",
author = "Sonya Borrero and Cara Nikolajski and Steinberg, {Julia R.} and Lori Freedman and Akers, {Aletha Y.} and Said Ibrahim and Eleanor Schwarz",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "150--156",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It just happens

T2 - A qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning

AU - Borrero, Sonya

AU - Nikolajski, Cara

AU - Steinberg, Julia R.

AU - Freedman, Lori

AU - Akers, Aletha Y.

AU - Ibrahim, Said

AU - Schwarz, Eleanor

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income women. We conducted a qualitative study with low-income women to better typologize pregnancy intention, understand the relationship between pregnancy intention and contraceptive use, and identify the contextual factors that shape pregnancy intention and contraceptive behavior. Study design Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, African-American and white women aged 18-45 recruited from reproductive health clinics in Pittsburgh, PA, to explore factors that influence women's pregnancy-related behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Results Among the 66 participants (36 African-American and 30 white), we identified several factors that may impede our public health goal of increasing the proportion of pregnancies that are consciously desired and planned. First, women do not always perceive that they have reproductive control and therefore do not necessarily formulate clear pregnancy intentions. Second, the benefits of a planned pregnancy may not be evident. Third, because preconception intention and planning do not necessarily occur, decisions about the acceptability of a pregnancy are often determined after the pregnancy has already occurred. Finally, even when women express a desire to avoid pregnancy, their contraceptive behaviors are not necessarily congruent with their desires. We also identified several clinically relevant and potentially modifiable factors that help to explain this intention-behavior discrepancy, including women's perceptions of low fecundity and their experiences with male partner contraceptive sabotage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the current conceptual framework that views pregnancy-related behaviors from a strict planned behavior perspective may be limited, particularly among low-income populations. Implications This study identified several cognitive and interpersonal pathways to unintended pregnancy among low-income women in Pittsburgh, PA, including perceptions of low reproductive control, perceptions of low fecundity and male partner reproductive coercion.

AB - Objective Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income women. We conducted a qualitative study with low-income women to better typologize pregnancy intention, understand the relationship between pregnancy intention and contraceptive use, and identify the contextual factors that shape pregnancy intention and contraceptive behavior. Study design Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, African-American and white women aged 18-45 recruited from reproductive health clinics in Pittsburgh, PA, to explore factors that influence women's pregnancy-related behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Results Among the 66 participants (36 African-American and 30 white), we identified several factors that may impede our public health goal of increasing the proportion of pregnancies that are consciously desired and planned. First, women do not always perceive that they have reproductive control and therefore do not necessarily formulate clear pregnancy intentions. Second, the benefits of a planned pregnancy may not be evident. Third, because preconception intention and planning do not necessarily occur, decisions about the acceptability of a pregnancy are often determined after the pregnancy has already occurred. Finally, even when women express a desire to avoid pregnancy, their contraceptive behaviors are not necessarily congruent with their desires. We also identified several clinically relevant and potentially modifiable factors that help to explain this intention-behavior discrepancy, including women's perceptions of low fecundity and their experiences with male partner contraceptive sabotage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the current conceptual framework that views pregnancy-related behaviors from a strict planned behavior perspective may be limited, particularly among low-income populations. Implications This study identified several cognitive and interpersonal pathways to unintended pregnancy among low-income women in Pittsburgh, PA, including perceptions of low reproductive control, perceptions of low fecundity and male partner reproductive coercion.

KW - Pregnancy intention

KW - Pregnancy planning

KW - Race

KW - Reproductive coercion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921288583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921288583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 150

EP - 156

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 2

ER -