Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis

Needs and Barriers

Nicholas Anderson, E. Sally Lee, J. Scott Brockenbrough, Mark E. Minie, Sherrilynne Fuller, James Brinkley, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: A. Identify the current state of data management needs of academic biomedical researchers. B. Explore their anticipated data management and analysis needs. C. Identify barriers to addressing those needs. Design: A multimodal needs analysis was conducted using a combination of an online survey and in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Subjects were recruited via an e-mail list representing a wide range of academic biomedical researchers in the Pacific Northwest. Measurements: The results from 286 survey respondents were used to provide triangulation of the qualitative analysis of data gathered from 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews. Results: Three major themes were identified: 1) there continues to be widespread use of basic general-purpose applications for core data management; 2) there is broad perceived need for additional support in managing and analyzing large datasets; and 3) the barriers to acquiring currently available tools are most commonly related to financial burdens on small labs and unmet expectations of institutional support. Conclusion: Themes identified in this study suggest that at least some common data management needs will best be served by improving access to basic level tools such that researchers can solve their own problems. Additionally, institutions and informaticians should focus on three components: 1) facilitate and encourage the use of modern data exchange models and standards, enabling researchers to leverage a common layer of interoperability and analysis; 2) improve the ability of researchers to maintain provenance of data and models as they evolve over time though tools and the leveraging of standards; and 3) develop and support information management service cores that could assist in these previous components while providing researchers with unique data analysis and information design support within a spectrum of informatics capabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)478-488
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biomedical Research
Research Personnel
Northwestern United States
Interviews
Information Management
Informatics
Information Services
Postal Service
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anderson, N., Lee, E. S., Brockenbrough, J. S., Minie, M. E., Fuller, S., Brinkley, J., & Tarczy-Hornoch, P. (2007). Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis: Needs and Barriers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(4), 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2114

Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis : Needs and Barriers. / Anderson, Nicholas; Lee, E. Sally; Brockenbrough, J. Scott; Minie, Mark E.; Fuller, Sherrilynne; Brinkley, James; Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 14, No. 4, 07.2007, p. 478-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, N, Lee, ES, Brockenbrough, JS, Minie, ME, Fuller, S, Brinkley, J & Tarczy-Hornoch, P 2007, 'Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis: Needs and Barriers', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2114
Anderson, Nicholas ; Lee, E. Sally ; Brockenbrough, J. Scott ; Minie, Mark E. ; Fuller, Sherrilynne ; Brinkley, James ; Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter. / Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis : Needs and Barriers. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 478-488.
@article{1485bdc594434c569340348699da1920,
title = "Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis: Needs and Barriers",
abstract = "Objectives: A. Identify the current state of data management needs of academic biomedical researchers. B. Explore their anticipated data management and analysis needs. C. Identify barriers to addressing those needs. Design: A multimodal needs analysis was conducted using a combination of an online survey and in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Subjects were recruited via an e-mail list representing a wide range of academic biomedical researchers in the Pacific Northwest. Measurements: The results from 286 survey respondents were used to provide triangulation of the qualitative analysis of data gathered from 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews. Results: Three major themes were identified: 1) there continues to be widespread use of basic general-purpose applications for core data management; 2) there is broad perceived need for additional support in managing and analyzing large datasets; and 3) the barriers to acquiring currently available tools are most commonly related to financial burdens on small labs and unmet expectations of institutional support. Conclusion: Themes identified in this study suggest that at least some common data management needs will best be served by improving access to basic level tools such that researchers can solve their own problems. Additionally, institutions and informaticians should focus on three components: 1) facilitate and encourage the use of modern data exchange models and standards, enabling researchers to leverage a common layer of interoperability and analysis; 2) improve the ability of researchers to maintain provenance of data and models as they evolve over time though tools and the leveraging of standards; and 3) develop and support information management service cores that could assist in these previous components while providing researchers with unique data analysis and information design support within a spectrum of informatics capabilities.",
author = "Nicholas Anderson and Lee, {E. Sally} and Brockenbrough, {J. Scott} and Minie, {Mark E.} and Sherrilynne Fuller and James Brinkley and Peter Tarczy-Hornoch",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1197/jamia.M2114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "478--488",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis

T2 - Needs and Barriers

AU - Anderson, Nicholas

AU - Lee, E. Sally

AU - Brockenbrough, J. Scott

AU - Minie, Mark E.

AU - Fuller, Sherrilynne

AU - Brinkley, James

AU - Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Objectives: A. Identify the current state of data management needs of academic biomedical researchers. B. Explore their anticipated data management and analysis needs. C. Identify barriers to addressing those needs. Design: A multimodal needs analysis was conducted using a combination of an online survey and in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Subjects were recruited via an e-mail list representing a wide range of academic biomedical researchers in the Pacific Northwest. Measurements: The results from 286 survey respondents were used to provide triangulation of the qualitative analysis of data gathered from 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews. Results: Three major themes were identified: 1) there continues to be widespread use of basic general-purpose applications for core data management; 2) there is broad perceived need for additional support in managing and analyzing large datasets; and 3) the barriers to acquiring currently available tools are most commonly related to financial burdens on small labs and unmet expectations of institutional support. Conclusion: Themes identified in this study suggest that at least some common data management needs will best be served by improving access to basic level tools such that researchers can solve their own problems. Additionally, institutions and informaticians should focus on three components: 1) facilitate and encourage the use of modern data exchange models and standards, enabling researchers to leverage a common layer of interoperability and analysis; 2) improve the ability of researchers to maintain provenance of data and models as they evolve over time though tools and the leveraging of standards; and 3) develop and support information management service cores that could assist in these previous components while providing researchers with unique data analysis and information design support within a spectrum of informatics capabilities.

AB - Objectives: A. Identify the current state of data management needs of academic biomedical researchers. B. Explore their anticipated data management and analysis needs. C. Identify barriers to addressing those needs. Design: A multimodal needs analysis was conducted using a combination of an online survey and in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Subjects were recruited via an e-mail list representing a wide range of academic biomedical researchers in the Pacific Northwest. Measurements: The results from 286 survey respondents were used to provide triangulation of the qualitative analysis of data gathered from 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews. Results: Three major themes were identified: 1) there continues to be widespread use of basic general-purpose applications for core data management; 2) there is broad perceived need for additional support in managing and analyzing large datasets; and 3) the barriers to acquiring currently available tools are most commonly related to financial burdens on small labs and unmet expectations of institutional support. Conclusion: Themes identified in this study suggest that at least some common data management needs will best be served by improving access to basic level tools such that researchers can solve their own problems. Additionally, institutions and informaticians should focus on three components: 1) facilitate and encourage the use of modern data exchange models and standards, enabling researchers to leverage a common layer of interoperability and analysis; 2) improve the ability of researchers to maintain provenance of data and models as they evolve over time though tools and the leveraging of standards; and 3) develop and support information management service cores that could assist in these previous components while providing researchers with unique data analysis and information design support within a spectrum of informatics capabilities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250696127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250696127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M2114

DO - 10.1197/jamia.M2114

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 478

EP - 488

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 4

ER -