Issues and challenges of non-tenure-track research faculty: The uc davis school of medicine experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nationally, medical schools are appointing growing numbers of research faculty into non-tenure-track positions, paralleling a similar trend in universities. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a statement expressing concern that the marked growth in non-tenure-track faculty can undermine educational quality, academic freedom, and collegiality. Like other medical schools, the UC Davis School of Medicine has had a rise in non-tenure-trackfaculty in order to enhance its research mission, in particular in the Salaried Adjunct faculty track (SalAdj). SalAdj faculty have more difficulty in achieving promotion, report inequitable treatment and less quality of life, have less opportunity to participate in governance, and feel second-class and insecure. These issues reflect those described by the AAUP. The authors describe the efforts at UC Davis to investigate and address these issues, implementation of a plan for improvement based on task force recommendations, and the lessons learned. Supporting transfer to faculty tracks in the academic senate, enhancing financial support, ensuring eligibility for internal grants, and equitable space assignments have contributed to an improved career path and more satisfaction among SalAdj faculty. Challenges in addressing these issues include limited availability of tenure-track positions, financial resources, adequate communication regarding change, and compliance with existing faculty search policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1041-1047
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Medicine
medicine
Research
school
experience
university teacher
Medical Schools
senate
Financial Support
Organized Financing
grant
Advisory Committees
quality of life
promotion
career
governance
Communication
university
communication
Quality of Life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Issues and challenges of non-tenure-track research faculty : The uc davis school of medicine experience. / Howell, Lydia P; Chen, Chao-Yin; Joad, Jesse P.; Green, Ralph; Callahan, Edward J; Bonham, Ann C.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 1041-1047.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85b99ba087e3465182d4552690e6c6a0,
title = "Issues and challenges of non-tenure-track research faculty: The uc davis school of medicine experience",
abstract = "Nationally, medical schools are appointing growing numbers of research faculty into non-tenure-track positions, paralleling a similar trend in universities. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a statement expressing concern that the marked growth in non-tenure-track faculty can undermine educational quality, academic freedom, and collegiality. Like other medical schools, the UC Davis School of Medicine has had a rise in non-tenure-trackfaculty in order to enhance its research mission, in particular in the Salaried Adjunct faculty track (SalAdj). SalAdj faculty have more difficulty in achieving promotion, report inequitable treatment and less quality of life, have less opportunity to participate in governance, and feel second-class and insecure. These issues reflect those described by the AAUP. The authors describe the efforts at UC Davis to investigate and address these issues, implementation of a plan for improvement based on task force recommendations, and the lessons learned. Supporting transfer to faculty tracks in the academic senate, enhancing financial support, ensuring eligibility for internal grants, and equitable space assignments have contributed to an improved career path and more satisfaction among SalAdj faculty. Challenges in addressing these issues include limited availability of tenure-track positions, financial resources, adequate communication regarding change, and compliance with existing faculty search policies.",
author = "Howell, {Lydia P} and Chao-Yin Chen and Joad, {Jesse P.} and Ralph Green and Callahan, {Edward J} and Bonham, {Ann C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbfbf3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1041--1047",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues and challenges of non-tenure-track research faculty

T2 - The uc davis school of medicine experience

AU - Howell, Lydia P

AU - Chen, Chao-Yin

AU - Joad, Jesse P.

AU - Green, Ralph

AU - Callahan, Edward J

AU - Bonham, Ann C.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Nationally, medical schools are appointing growing numbers of research faculty into non-tenure-track positions, paralleling a similar trend in universities. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a statement expressing concern that the marked growth in non-tenure-track faculty can undermine educational quality, academic freedom, and collegiality. Like other medical schools, the UC Davis School of Medicine has had a rise in non-tenure-trackfaculty in order to enhance its research mission, in particular in the Salaried Adjunct faculty track (SalAdj). SalAdj faculty have more difficulty in achieving promotion, report inequitable treatment and less quality of life, have less opportunity to participate in governance, and feel second-class and insecure. These issues reflect those described by the AAUP. The authors describe the efforts at UC Davis to investigate and address these issues, implementation of a plan for improvement based on task force recommendations, and the lessons learned. Supporting transfer to faculty tracks in the academic senate, enhancing financial support, ensuring eligibility for internal grants, and equitable space assignments have contributed to an improved career path and more satisfaction among SalAdj faculty. Challenges in addressing these issues include limited availability of tenure-track positions, financial resources, adequate communication regarding change, and compliance with existing faculty search policies.

AB - Nationally, medical schools are appointing growing numbers of research faculty into non-tenure-track positions, paralleling a similar trend in universities. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a statement expressing concern that the marked growth in non-tenure-track faculty can undermine educational quality, academic freedom, and collegiality. Like other medical schools, the UC Davis School of Medicine has had a rise in non-tenure-trackfaculty in order to enhance its research mission, in particular in the Salaried Adjunct faculty track (SalAdj). SalAdj faculty have more difficulty in achieving promotion, report inequitable treatment and less quality of life, have less opportunity to participate in governance, and feel second-class and insecure. These issues reflect those described by the AAUP. The authors describe the efforts at UC Davis to investigate and address these issues, implementation of a plan for improvement based on task force recommendations, and the lessons learned. Supporting transfer to faculty tracks in the academic senate, enhancing financial support, ensuring eligibility for internal grants, and equitable space assignments have contributed to an improved career path and more satisfaction among SalAdj faculty. Challenges in addressing these issues include limited availability of tenure-track positions, financial resources, adequate communication regarding change, and compliance with existing faculty search policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953169011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953169011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbfbf3

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbfbf3

M3 - Article

C2 - 20505407

AN - SCOPUS:77953169011

VL - 85

SP - 1041

EP - 1047

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 6

ER -