Is there more to the clinical outcome in posttraumatic reconstruction of the inferior and medial orbital walls than accuracy of implant placement and implant surface contouring? A prospective multicenter study to identify predictors of clinical outcome

Rüdiger M. Zimmerer, Nils Claudius Gellrich, Sophie von Bülow, Edward Bradley Strong, Edward Ellis, Maximilian E.H. Wagner, Gregorio Sanchez Aniceto, Alexander Schramm, Michael P. Grant, Lim Thiam Chye, Alvaro Rivero Calle, Frank Wilde, Daniel Perez, Gido Bittermann, Nicholas R. Mahoney, Marta Redondo Alamillos, Joanna Bašić, Marc Metzger, Michael Rasse, Jan DittmanElke Rometsch, Kathrin Espinoza, Ronny Hesse, Carl Peter Cornelius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Reconstruction of orbital wall fractures is demanding and has improved dramatically with the implementation of new technologies. True-to-original accuracy of reconstruction has been deemed essential for good clinical outcome, and reasons for unfavorable clinical outcome have been researched extensively. However, no detailed analysis on the influence of plate position and surface contour on clinical outcome has yet been published. Materials and methods: Data from a previous study were used for an ad-hoc analysis to identify predictors for unfavorable outcome, defined as diplopia or differences in globe height and/or globe projection of >2 mm. Presumed predictors were implant surface contour, aberrant implant dimension or position, accuracy of reconstructed orbital volume, and anatomical fracture topography according to the current AO classification. Results: Neither in univariable nor in multivariable regression models were unfavorable clinical outcomes associated with any of the presumed radiological predictors, and no association of the type of implant, i.e., standard preformed, CAD-based individualized and non-CAD-based individualized with its surface contour could be shown. Conclusion: These data suggest that the influence of accurate mechanical reconstruction on clinical outcomes may be less predictable than previously believed, while the role of soft-tissue-related factors may have been underestimated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Blow-out fracture
  • Clinical outcome
  • Orbital fracture
  • Orbital implant
  • Predictor
  • Regression analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is there more to the clinical outcome in posttraumatic reconstruction of the inferior and medial orbital walls than accuracy of implant placement and implant surface contouring? A prospective multicenter study to identify predictors of clinical outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zimmerer, R. M., Gellrich, N. C., von Bülow, S., Strong, E. B., Ellis, E., Wagner, M. E. H., Sanchez Aniceto, G., Schramm, A., Grant, M. P., Thiam Chye, L., Rivero Calle, A., Wilde, F., Perez, D., Bittermann, G., Mahoney, N. R., Redondo Alamillos, M., Bašić, J., Metzger, M., Rasse, M., ... Cornelius, C. P. (Accepted/In press). Is there more to the clinical outcome in posttraumatic reconstruction of the inferior and medial orbital walls than accuracy of implant placement and implant surface contouring? A prospective multicenter study to identify predictors of clinical outcome. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.007