Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative?

Paul Walsh, Christina Overmyer, Christine Hancock, Jacquelyn Heffner, Nicholas Walker, Thienphuc Nguyen, Lucas Shanholtzer, Enrique Caldera, James Pusavat, Eli Mordechai, Martin E. Adelson, Kathryn T. Iacono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To measure the performance characteristics of an immunochromatographic rapid antigen test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and determine how its interpretation should be contextualised in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with bronchiolitis. Design: Diagnostic accuracy study of a rapid RSV test. Setting: County hospital ED. Intervention: We took paired nasal samples from consecutively enrolled infants with bronchiolitis and tested them with a rapid immunochromatographic antigen test and reverse transcriptase PCR gold standard. Outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, the effect of point prevalence, clinical findings and overall context on predictive values. We used these to construct a graphical contextual model to show how the results of RSV antigen tests from infants presenting within 24 h should influence interpretation of subsequent antigen tests. Results: We analysed 607 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for immunochromatographic testing was 79.4% (95% CI 73.9% to 84.2%) and 67.1% (95% CI 61.9% to 72%) respectively. We found little evidence of spectrum bias. In our contextual model the best predictor of a positive RT-PCR test was a positive antigen test OR 5.47 (95% CI 3.65 to 8.18) and the number of other infants having positive tests within 24 h OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.72) per infant. Increasing numbers presenting to the ED with bronchiolitis in a given day increases the probability of RSV infection. Conclusions: The RSV antigen test we examined had modest performance characteristics. The results of the antigen test should be interpreted in the context of the results of previous tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-159
Number of pages7
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
Antigens
Bronchiolitis
Hospital Emergency Service
County Hospitals
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
Sensitivity and Specificity
Hospital Departments
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Nose
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Polymerase Chain Reaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative? / Walsh, Paul; Overmyer, Christina; Hancock, Christine; Heffner, Jacquelyn; Walker, Nicholas; Nguyen, Thienphuc; Shanholtzer, Lucas; Caldera, Enrique; Pusavat, James; Mordechai, Eli; Adelson, Martin E.; Iacono, Kathryn T.

In: Emergency Medicine Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 153-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walsh, P, Overmyer, C, Hancock, C, Heffner, J, Walker, N, Nguyen, T, Shanholtzer, L, Caldera, E, Pusavat, J, Mordechai, E, Adelson, ME & Iacono, KT 2014, 'Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative?', Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-202729
Walsh, Paul ; Overmyer, Christina ; Hancock, Christine ; Heffner, Jacquelyn ; Walker, Nicholas ; Nguyen, Thienphuc ; Shanholtzer, Lucas ; Caldera, Enrique ; Pusavat, James ; Mordechai, Eli ; Adelson, Martin E. ; Iacono, Kathryn T. / Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative?. In: Emergency Medicine Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 153-159.
@article{2aeef20b0d074b798bafaf8d51e8c62d,
title = "Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative?",
abstract = "Objective: To measure the performance characteristics of an immunochromatographic rapid antigen test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and determine how its interpretation should be contextualised in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with bronchiolitis. Design: Diagnostic accuracy study of a rapid RSV test. Setting: County hospital ED. Intervention: We took paired nasal samples from consecutively enrolled infants with bronchiolitis and tested them with a rapid immunochromatographic antigen test and reverse transcriptase PCR gold standard. Outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, the effect of point prevalence, clinical findings and overall context on predictive values. We used these to construct a graphical contextual model to show how the results of RSV antigen tests from infants presenting within 24 h should influence interpretation of subsequent antigen tests. Results: We analysed 607 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for immunochromatographic testing was 79.4{\%} (95{\%} CI 73.9{\%} to 84.2{\%}) and 67.1{\%} (95{\%} CI 61.9{\%} to 72{\%}) respectively. We found little evidence of spectrum bias. In our contextual model the best predictor of a positive RT-PCR test was a positive antigen test OR 5.47 (95{\%} CI 3.65 to 8.18) and the number of other infants having positive tests within 24 h OR 1.48 (95{\%} CI 1.26 to 1.72) per infant. Increasing numbers presenting to the ED with bronchiolitis in a given day increases the probability of RSV infection. Conclusions: The RSV antigen test we examined had modest performance characteristics. The results of the antigen test should be interpreted in the context of the results of previous tests.",
author = "Paul Walsh and Christina Overmyer and Christine Hancock and Jacquelyn Heffner and Nicholas Walker and Thienphuc Nguyen and Lucas Shanholtzer and Enrique Caldera and James Pusavat and Eli Mordechai and Adelson, {Martin E.} and Iacono, {Kathryn T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/emermed-2013-202729",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "153--159",
journal = "Emergency Medicine Journal",
issn = "1472-0205",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative?

AU - Walsh, Paul

AU - Overmyer, Christina

AU - Hancock, Christine

AU - Heffner, Jacquelyn

AU - Walker, Nicholas

AU - Nguyen, Thienphuc

AU - Shanholtzer, Lucas

AU - Caldera, Enrique

AU - Pusavat, James

AU - Mordechai, Eli

AU - Adelson, Martin E.

AU - Iacono, Kathryn T.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objective: To measure the performance characteristics of an immunochromatographic rapid antigen test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and determine how its interpretation should be contextualised in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with bronchiolitis. Design: Diagnostic accuracy study of a rapid RSV test. Setting: County hospital ED. Intervention: We took paired nasal samples from consecutively enrolled infants with bronchiolitis and tested them with a rapid immunochromatographic antigen test and reverse transcriptase PCR gold standard. Outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, the effect of point prevalence, clinical findings and overall context on predictive values. We used these to construct a graphical contextual model to show how the results of RSV antigen tests from infants presenting within 24 h should influence interpretation of subsequent antigen tests. Results: We analysed 607 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for immunochromatographic testing was 79.4% (95% CI 73.9% to 84.2%) and 67.1% (95% CI 61.9% to 72%) respectively. We found little evidence of spectrum bias. In our contextual model the best predictor of a positive RT-PCR test was a positive antigen test OR 5.47 (95% CI 3.65 to 8.18) and the number of other infants having positive tests within 24 h OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.72) per infant. Increasing numbers presenting to the ED with bronchiolitis in a given day increases the probability of RSV infection. Conclusions: The RSV antigen test we examined had modest performance characteristics. The results of the antigen test should be interpreted in the context of the results of previous tests.

AB - Objective: To measure the performance characteristics of an immunochromatographic rapid antigen test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and determine how its interpretation should be contextualised in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with bronchiolitis. Design: Diagnostic accuracy study of a rapid RSV test. Setting: County hospital ED. Intervention: We took paired nasal samples from consecutively enrolled infants with bronchiolitis and tested them with a rapid immunochromatographic antigen test and reverse transcriptase PCR gold standard. Outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, the effect of point prevalence, clinical findings and overall context on predictive values. We used these to construct a graphical contextual model to show how the results of RSV antigen tests from infants presenting within 24 h should influence interpretation of subsequent antigen tests. Results: We analysed 607 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for immunochromatographic testing was 79.4% (95% CI 73.9% to 84.2%) and 67.1% (95% CI 61.9% to 72%) respectively. We found little evidence of spectrum bias. In our contextual model the best predictor of a positive RT-PCR test was a positive antigen test OR 5.47 (95% CI 3.65 to 8.18) and the number of other infants having positive tests within 24 h OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.72) per infant. Increasing numbers presenting to the ED with bronchiolitis in a given day increases the probability of RSV infection. Conclusions: The RSV antigen test we examined had modest performance characteristics. The results of the antigen test should be interpreted in the context of the results of previous tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892753489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892753489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/emermed-2013-202729

DO - 10.1136/emermed-2013-202729

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 153

EP - 159

JO - Emergency Medicine Journal

JF - Emergency Medicine Journal

SN - 1472-0205

IS - 2

ER -