Is studying rhytidectomy malpractice cases enough to understand why patients are dissatisfied? More patient communication, less malpractice litigation

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-260
Number of pages2
JournalJAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Rhytidoplasty
Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{1714c515e8494fd59251695cf8693542,
title = "Is studying rhytidectomy malpractice cases enough to understand why patients are dissatisfied? More patient communication, less malpractice litigation",
author = "Sykes, {Jonathan M}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2137",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "259--260",
journal = "JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2168-6076",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is studying rhytidectomy malpractice cases enough to understand why patients are dissatisfied? More patient communication, less malpractice litigation

AU - Sykes, Jonathan M

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025632906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025632906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2137

DO - 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2137

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28199536

AN - SCOPUS:85025632906

VL - 19

SP - 259

EP - 260

JO - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

JF - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

SN - 2168-6076

IS - 4

ER -