Is Price a Barrier to Eating More Fruits and Vegetables for Low-Income Families?

Diana L Cassady, Karen M. Jetter, Jennifer Culp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if price is a barrier to fruit and vegetable consumption for low-income families by comparing the average cost of a market basket of fruits and vegetables from the Thrifty Food Plan and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 (2005 Dietary Guidelines), investigating variations in price by neighborhood income and by type of supermarket, and estimating the influence of a 2005 Dietary Guidelines fruit and vegetable basket on the food budget of a low-income family. Design: A market basket survey was conducted at 25 supermarkets across three time periods to allow for seasonal variation in produce prices. Setting: Stores were selected from census tracts with a variety of income levels in Sacramento, CA, and Los Angeles, CA. Main outcome measures: The average cost of a Thrifty Food Plan and 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket for fruits and vegetables. Statistical analyses performed: Student t tests were used to compare the mean cost of market baskets. Results: The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket cost 4% less than the Thrifty Food Plan (P<0.001), and was significantly less expensive in low-income areas at $65 (P<0.05), and in bulk supermarkets at $59 (P<0.05). The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket would require a low-income family to devote 43% to 70% of their food budget to fruits and vegetables. Conclusions: Public policies should examine ways to make fruits and vegetables more affordable to low-income families.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1909-1915
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Dietetic Association
Volume107
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

low income households
Dietary Guidelines
Nutrition Policy
Vegetables
Fruit
Eating
vegetables
ingestion
fruits
markets
supermarkets
Food
income
Costs and Cost Analysis
Budgets
food prices
dietary surveys
public policy
vegetable consumption
fruit consumption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Is Price a Barrier to Eating More Fruits and Vegetables for Low-Income Families? / Cassady, Diana L; Jetter, Karen M.; Culp, Jennifer.

In: Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 107, No. 11, 11.2007, p. 1909-1915.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71200e50456d45f38784ae1829ee0bb2,
title = "Is Price a Barrier to Eating More Fruits and Vegetables for Low-Income Families?",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if price is a barrier to fruit and vegetable consumption for low-income families by comparing the average cost of a market basket of fruits and vegetables from the Thrifty Food Plan and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 (2005 Dietary Guidelines), investigating variations in price by neighborhood income and by type of supermarket, and estimating the influence of a 2005 Dietary Guidelines fruit and vegetable basket on the food budget of a low-income family. Design: A market basket survey was conducted at 25 supermarkets across three time periods to allow for seasonal variation in produce prices. Setting: Stores were selected from census tracts with a variety of income levels in Sacramento, CA, and Los Angeles, CA. Main outcome measures: The average cost of a Thrifty Food Plan and 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket for fruits and vegetables. Statistical analyses performed: Student t tests were used to compare the mean cost of market baskets. Results: The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket cost 4{\%} less than the Thrifty Food Plan (P<0.001), and was significantly less expensive in low-income areas at $65 (P<0.05), and in bulk supermarkets at $59 (P<0.05). The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket would require a low-income family to devote 43{\%} to 70{\%} of their food budget to fruits and vegetables. Conclusions: Public policies should examine ways to make fruits and vegetables more affordable to low-income families.",
author = "Cassady, {Diana L} and Jetter, {Karen M.} and Jennifer Culp",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "1909--1915",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Price a Barrier to Eating More Fruits and Vegetables for Low-Income Families?

AU - Cassady, Diana L

AU - Jetter, Karen M.

AU - Culp, Jennifer

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Objective: To determine if price is a barrier to fruit and vegetable consumption for low-income families by comparing the average cost of a market basket of fruits and vegetables from the Thrifty Food Plan and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 (2005 Dietary Guidelines), investigating variations in price by neighborhood income and by type of supermarket, and estimating the influence of a 2005 Dietary Guidelines fruit and vegetable basket on the food budget of a low-income family. Design: A market basket survey was conducted at 25 supermarkets across three time periods to allow for seasonal variation in produce prices. Setting: Stores were selected from census tracts with a variety of income levels in Sacramento, CA, and Los Angeles, CA. Main outcome measures: The average cost of a Thrifty Food Plan and 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket for fruits and vegetables. Statistical analyses performed: Student t tests were used to compare the mean cost of market baskets. Results: The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket cost 4% less than the Thrifty Food Plan (P<0.001), and was significantly less expensive in low-income areas at $65 (P<0.05), and in bulk supermarkets at $59 (P<0.05). The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket would require a low-income family to devote 43% to 70% of their food budget to fruits and vegetables. Conclusions: Public policies should examine ways to make fruits and vegetables more affordable to low-income families.

AB - Objective: To determine if price is a barrier to fruit and vegetable consumption for low-income families by comparing the average cost of a market basket of fruits and vegetables from the Thrifty Food Plan and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 (2005 Dietary Guidelines), investigating variations in price by neighborhood income and by type of supermarket, and estimating the influence of a 2005 Dietary Guidelines fruit and vegetable basket on the food budget of a low-income family. Design: A market basket survey was conducted at 25 supermarkets across three time periods to allow for seasonal variation in produce prices. Setting: Stores were selected from census tracts with a variety of income levels in Sacramento, CA, and Los Angeles, CA. Main outcome measures: The average cost of a Thrifty Food Plan and 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket for fruits and vegetables. Statistical analyses performed: Student t tests were used to compare the mean cost of market baskets. Results: The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket cost 4% less than the Thrifty Food Plan (P<0.001), and was significantly less expensive in low-income areas at $65 (P<0.05), and in bulk supermarkets at $59 (P<0.05). The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket would require a low-income family to devote 43% to 70% of their food budget to fruits and vegetables. Conclusions: Public policies should examine ways to make fruits and vegetables more affordable to low-income families.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348952594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348952594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.015

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 1909

EP - 1915

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

IS - 11

ER -