Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy?

Berta M. Geller, Andy Bogart, Patricia A. Carney, Joann G. Elmore, Barbara S. Monsees, Diana L Miglioretti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Interpretive accuracy varies among radiologists, especially in mammography. This study examines the relationship between radiologists' confidence in their assessments and their accuracy in interpreting mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this study, 119 community radiologists interpreted 109 expert-defined screening mammography examinations in test sets and rated their confidence in their assessment for each case. They also provided a global assessment of their ability to interpret mammograms. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were modeled as functions of self-rated confidence on each examination using log-linear regression estimated with generalized estimating equations. Reference measures were cancer status and expert-defined need for recall. Effect modification by weekly mammography volume was examined. RESULTS. Radiologists who self-reported higher global interpretive ability tended to interpret more mammograms per week (p = 0.08), were more likely to specialize (p = 0.02) and to have completed a fellowship in breast or women's imaging (p = 0.05), and had a higher PPV for cancer detection (p = 0.01). Examinations for which low-volume radiologists were "very confident" had a PPV of 2.93 times (95% CI, 2.01-4.27) higher than examinations they rated with neutral confidence. Trends of increasing NPVs with increasing confidence were significant for low-volume radiologists relative to noncancers (p = 0.01) and expert nonrecalls (p < 0.001). A trend of significantly increasing NPVs existed for high-volume radiologists relative to expert nonrecall (p = 0.02) but not relative to noncancer status (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION. Confidence in mammography assessments was associated with better accuracy, especially for low-volume readers. Asking for a second opinion when confidence in an assessment is low may increase accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume199
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Confidence
  • Mammography
  • Radiologist performance
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this