Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: Is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe?

Richard W Katzberg, Jeffrey H. Newhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From the multiple perspectives described, it is our belief that the risk of CIN with CE CT has been exaggerated. Clinical rates and adverse outcomes from cardiac catheterization and intervention cannot be extrapolated to the clinical experience with CE CT. It appears that all currently used nonionic CM have similar safety profiles. We believe that modern CM pose only a small risk to renal function and that thresholds of creatinine above which CM are withheld for CT should be increased to improve the accuracy of CT examinations. The population of patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction who would then receive CM should be analyzed carefully to determine whether the thresholds subsequently can be increased further. International radiologic professional organizations, such as the American College of Radiology, should revisit the basis of their practice guidelines to reduce their implications about the danger of CIN with CE CT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-28
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume256
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Contrast Media
Kidney
Cardiac Catheterization
Practice Guidelines
Radiology
Creatinine
Safety
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity : Is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? / Katzberg, Richard W; Newhouse, Jeffrey H.

In: Radiology, Vol. 256, No. 1, 07.2010, p. 21-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Katzberg, Richard W ; Newhouse, Jeffrey H. / Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity : Is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe?. In: Radiology. 2010 ; Vol. 256, No. 1. pp. 21-28.
@article{a8e155b3f73949cba0259de4ee218329,
title = "Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: Is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe?",
abstract = "From the multiple perspectives described, it is our belief that the risk of CIN with CE CT has been exaggerated. Clinical rates and adverse outcomes from cardiac catheterization and intervention cannot be extrapolated to the clinical experience with CE CT. It appears that all currently used nonionic CM have similar safety profiles. We believe that modern CM pose only a small risk to renal function and that thresholds of creatinine above which CM are withheld for CT should be increased to improve the accuracy of CT examinations. The population of patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction who would then receive CM should be analyzed carefully to determine whether the thresholds subsequently can be increased further. International radiologic professional organizations, such as the American College of Radiology, should revisit the basis of their practice guidelines to reduce their implications about the danger of CIN with CE CT.",
author = "Katzberg, {Richard W} and Newhouse, {Jeffrey H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.10092000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "256",
pages = "21--28",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity

T2 - Is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe?

AU - Katzberg, Richard W

AU - Newhouse, Jeffrey H.

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - From the multiple perspectives described, it is our belief that the risk of CIN with CE CT has been exaggerated. Clinical rates and adverse outcomes from cardiac catheterization and intervention cannot be extrapolated to the clinical experience with CE CT. It appears that all currently used nonionic CM have similar safety profiles. We believe that modern CM pose only a small risk to renal function and that thresholds of creatinine above which CM are withheld for CT should be increased to improve the accuracy of CT examinations. The population of patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction who would then receive CM should be analyzed carefully to determine whether the thresholds subsequently can be increased further. International radiologic professional organizations, such as the American College of Radiology, should revisit the basis of their practice guidelines to reduce their implications about the danger of CIN with CE CT.

AB - From the multiple perspectives described, it is our belief that the risk of CIN with CE CT has been exaggerated. Clinical rates and adverse outcomes from cardiac catheterization and intervention cannot be extrapolated to the clinical experience with CE CT. It appears that all currently used nonionic CM have similar safety profiles. We believe that modern CM pose only a small risk to renal function and that thresholds of creatinine above which CM are withheld for CT should be increased to improve the accuracy of CT examinations. The population of patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction who would then receive CM should be analyzed carefully to determine whether the thresholds subsequently can be increased further. International radiologic professional organizations, such as the American College of Radiology, should revisit the basis of their practice guidelines to reduce their implications about the danger of CIN with CE CT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953938050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953938050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.10092000

DO - 10.1148/radiol.10092000

M3 - Review article

C2 - 20574082

AN - SCOPUS:77953938050

VL - 256

SP - 21

EP - 28

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -