Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks

Greg S. Harrington, M. H. Buonocore, Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of functional MR imaging (fMRI) activation (volume and laterally) within both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions of interest for both receptive and expressive language tasks. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in fMRI experiments for 6 language tasks: verb generation, confrontation naming, semantic decision making, visual sentence comprehension, auditory sentence comprehension, and story listening. Each subject was scanned during 2 separate sessions separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Laterally of activation was defined by laterality indices (LIs), which were calculated by 2 methods: one method based on the measured volume of activation and the other method based on the F statistic of the activation. Reproducibility was calculated by using concurrence ratios for the volume of activation (Roverlap, Rvolume) and test-retest correlation for LIs. RESULTS: All tasks generated reproducible LIs within at least one of the regions of interest, but verb generation produced the highest test-retest correlations (r = 0.99) within both regions of interest. Verb generation was associated with the highest average concurrence ratios within the inferior frontal region of interest (Roverlap = 45.2; Rvolume = 70.9). In general, the concurrence ratios were lower within the temporoparietal region of interest compared with the inferior frontal region of interest. LIs calculated with F statistics were more reproducible than the LIs calculated by activation volume. CONCLUSION: fMRI is able to provide reproducible LIs in both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions for assessing hemispheric dominance in language processing. The volume of activation, especially within the temporoparietal regions, is less reproducible than the laterality of activation, so the former should be used with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)938-944
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume27
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Language
Semantics
Decision Making
Healthy Volunteers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks. / Harrington, Greg S.; Buonocore, M. H.; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah E.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 938-944.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ce2929124084e938a6b82952dfdd92b,
title = "Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of functional MR imaging (fMRI) activation (volume and laterally) within both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions of interest for both receptive and expressive language tasks. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in fMRI experiments for 6 language tasks: verb generation, confrontation naming, semantic decision making, visual sentence comprehension, auditory sentence comprehension, and story listening. Each subject was scanned during 2 separate sessions separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Laterally of activation was defined by laterality indices (LIs), which were calculated by 2 methods: one method based on the measured volume of activation and the other method based on the F statistic of the activation. Reproducibility was calculated by using concurrence ratios for the volume of activation (Roverlap, Rvolume) and test-retest correlation for LIs. RESULTS: All tasks generated reproducible LIs within at least one of the regions of interest, but verb generation produced the highest test-retest correlations (r = 0.99) within both regions of interest. Verb generation was associated with the highest average concurrence ratios within the inferior frontal region of interest (Roverlap = 45.2; Rvolume = 70.9). In general, the concurrence ratios were lower within the temporoparietal region of interest compared with the inferior frontal region of interest. LIs calculated with F statistics were more reproducible than the LIs calculated by activation volume. CONCLUSION: fMRI is able to provide reproducible LIs in both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions for assessing hemispheric dominance in language processing. The volume of activation, especially within the temporoparietal regions, is less reproducible than the laterality of activation, so the former should be used with caution.",
author = "Harrington, {Greg S.} and Buonocore, {M. H.} and {Tomaszewski Farias}, {Sarah E}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "938--944",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks

AU - Harrington, Greg S.

AU - Buonocore, M. H.

AU - Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah E

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of functional MR imaging (fMRI) activation (volume and laterally) within both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions of interest for both receptive and expressive language tasks. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in fMRI experiments for 6 language tasks: verb generation, confrontation naming, semantic decision making, visual sentence comprehension, auditory sentence comprehension, and story listening. Each subject was scanned during 2 separate sessions separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Laterally of activation was defined by laterality indices (LIs), which were calculated by 2 methods: one method based on the measured volume of activation and the other method based on the F statistic of the activation. Reproducibility was calculated by using concurrence ratios for the volume of activation (Roverlap, Rvolume) and test-retest correlation for LIs. RESULTS: All tasks generated reproducible LIs within at least one of the regions of interest, but verb generation produced the highest test-retest correlations (r = 0.99) within both regions of interest. Verb generation was associated with the highest average concurrence ratios within the inferior frontal region of interest (Roverlap = 45.2; Rvolume = 70.9). In general, the concurrence ratios were lower within the temporoparietal region of interest compared with the inferior frontal region of interest. LIs calculated with F statistics were more reproducible than the LIs calculated by activation volume. CONCLUSION: fMRI is able to provide reproducible LIs in both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions for assessing hemispheric dominance in language processing. The volume of activation, especially within the temporoparietal regions, is less reproducible than the laterality of activation, so the former should be used with caution.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of functional MR imaging (fMRI) activation (volume and laterally) within both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions of interest for both receptive and expressive language tasks. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in fMRI experiments for 6 language tasks: verb generation, confrontation naming, semantic decision making, visual sentence comprehension, auditory sentence comprehension, and story listening. Each subject was scanned during 2 separate sessions separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Laterally of activation was defined by laterality indices (LIs), which were calculated by 2 methods: one method based on the measured volume of activation and the other method based on the F statistic of the activation. Reproducibility was calculated by using concurrence ratios for the volume of activation (Roverlap, Rvolume) and test-retest correlation for LIs. RESULTS: All tasks generated reproducible LIs within at least one of the regions of interest, but verb generation produced the highest test-retest correlations (r = 0.99) within both regions of interest. Verb generation was associated with the highest average concurrence ratios within the inferior frontal region of interest (Roverlap = 45.2; Rvolume = 70.9). In general, the concurrence ratios were lower within the temporoparietal region of interest compared with the inferior frontal region of interest. LIs calculated with F statistics were more reproducible than the LIs calculated by activation volume. CONCLUSION: fMRI is able to provide reproducible LIs in both inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions for assessing hemispheric dominance in language processing. The volume of activation, especially within the temporoparietal regions, is less reproducible than the laterality of activation, so the former should be used with caution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748037043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748037043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16611797

AN - SCOPUS:33748037043

VL - 27

SP - 938

EP - 944

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 4

ER -