Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation

Eric J. Cassell, Ben A Rich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Palliative sedation (sedation to unconsciousness) as an option of last resort for intractable end-of-life distress has been the subject of ongoing discussion and debate as well as policy formulation. A particularly contentious issue has been whether some dying patients experience a form of intractable suffering not marked by physical symptoms that can reasonably be characterized as " existential" in nature and therefore not an acceptable indication for palliative sedation. Such is the position recently taken by the American Medical Association. In this essay we argue that such a stance reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of human suffering, particularly at the end of life, and may deprive some dying patients of an effective means of relieving their intractable terminal distress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-438
Number of pages4
JournalPain Medicine
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
Ethics
Unconsciousness
American Medical Association

Keywords

  • End-of-Life care
  • Ethics
  • Palliative treatment
  • Sedation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation. / Cassell, Eric J.; Rich, Ben A.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 435-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e7827744bf442fc8529cf57c22b8341,
title = "Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation",
abstract = "Palliative sedation (sedation to unconsciousness) as an option of last resort for intractable end-of-life distress has been the subject of ongoing discussion and debate as well as policy formulation. A particularly contentious issue has been whether some dying patients experience a form of intractable suffering not marked by physical symptoms that can reasonably be characterized as {"} existential{"} in nature and therefore not an acceptable indication for palliative sedation. Such is the position recently taken by the American Medical Association. In this essay we argue that such a stance reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of human suffering, particularly at the end of life, and may deprive some dying patients of an effective means of relieving their intractable terminal distress.",
keywords = "End-of-Life care, Ethics, Palliative treatment, Sedation",
author = "Cassell, {Eric J.} and Rich, {Ben A}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00786.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "435--438",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation

AU - Cassell, Eric J.

AU - Rich, Ben A

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Palliative sedation (sedation to unconsciousness) as an option of last resort for intractable end-of-life distress has been the subject of ongoing discussion and debate as well as policy formulation. A particularly contentious issue has been whether some dying patients experience a form of intractable suffering not marked by physical symptoms that can reasonably be characterized as " existential" in nature and therefore not an acceptable indication for palliative sedation. Such is the position recently taken by the American Medical Association. In this essay we argue that such a stance reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of human suffering, particularly at the end of life, and may deprive some dying patients of an effective means of relieving their intractable terminal distress.

AB - Palliative sedation (sedation to unconsciousness) as an option of last resort for intractable end-of-life distress has been the subject of ongoing discussion and debate as well as policy formulation. A particularly contentious issue has been whether some dying patients experience a form of intractable suffering not marked by physical symptoms that can reasonably be characterized as " existential" in nature and therefore not an acceptable indication for palliative sedation. Such is the position recently taken by the American Medical Association. In this essay we argue that such a stance reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of human suffering, particularly at the end of life, and may deprive some dying patients of an effective means of relieving their intractable terminal distress.

KW - End-of-Life care

KW - Ethics

KW - Palliative treatment

KW - Sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950979704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950979704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00786.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00786.x

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 435

EP - 438

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 3

ER -