Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting: A scoping review

Molly Courtenay, Susan Nancarrow, David L Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Approximately 70 to 80% of healthcare errors are due to poor team communication and understanding. High-risk environments such as the trauma setting (which covers a broad spectrum of departments in acute services) are where the majority of these errors occur. Despite the emphasis on interprofessional collaborative practice and patient safety, interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting has received little attention. This paper presents the findings of a scoping review designed to identify the extent and nature of this literature in this setting. The MEDLINE (via OVID, using keywords and MeSH in OVID), and PubMed (via NCBI using MeSH), and CINAHL databases were searched from January 2000 to April 2013 for results of interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting. A hand search was conducted by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles. In total, 24 published articles were identified for inclusion in the review. Studies could be categorized into three main areas, and within each area were a number of themes: 1) descriptions of the organization of trauma teams (themes included interaction between team members, and leadership); 2) descriptions of team composition and structure (themes included maintaining team stability and core team members); and 3) evaluation of team work interventions (themes included activities in practice and activities in the classroom setting).Descriptive studies highlighted the fluid nature of team processes, the shared mental models, and the need for teamwork and communication. Evaluative studies placed a greater emphasis on specialized roles and individual tasks and activities. This reflects a multiprofessional as opposed to an interprofessional model of teamwork. Some of the characteristics of high-performing interprofessional teams described in this review are also evident in effective teams in the community rehabilitation and intermediate care setting. These characteristics may well be pertinent to other settings, and so provide a useful foundation for future investigations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number57
JournalHuman Resources for Health
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 5 2013

Fingerprint

teamwork
trauma
Wounds and Injuries
Communication
Mental Processes
Patient Safety
PubMed
MEDLINE
Rehabilitation
Organizations
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
communication
rehabilitation
inclusion
leadership
organization
classroom

Keywords

  • Interprofessional collaborative practice
  • Interprofessional teamworking
  • Trauma setting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting : A scoping review. / Courtenay, Molly; Nancarrow, Susan; Dawson, David L.

In: Human Resources for Health, Vol. 11, No. 1, 57, 05.11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d9ce28aed5104d6eb68fe58389744946,
title = "Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting: A scoping review",
abstract = "Approximately 70 to 80{\%} of healthcare errors are due to poor team communication and understanding. High-risk environments such as the trauma setting (which covers a broad spectrum of departments in acute services) are where the majority of these errors occur. Despite the emphasis on interprofessional collaborative practice and patient safety, interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting has received little attention. This paper presents the findings of a scoping review designed to identify the extent and nature of this literature in this setting. The MEDLINE (via OVID, using keywords and MeSH in OVID), and PubMed (via NCBI using MeSH), and CINAHL databases were searched from January 2000 to April 2013 for results of interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting. A hand search was conducted by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles. In total, 24 published articles were identified for inclusion in the review. Studies could be categorized into three main areas, and within each area were a number of themes: 1) descriptions of the organization of trauma teams (themes included interaction between team members, and leadership); 2) descriptions of team composition and structure (themes included maintaining team stability and core team members); and 3) evaluation of team work interventions (themes included activities in practice and activities in the classroom setting).Descriptive studies highlighted the fluid nature of team processes, the shared mental models, and the need for teamwork and communication. Evaluative studies placed a greater emphasis on specialized roles and individual tasks and activities. This reflects a multiprofessional as opposed to an interprofessional model of teamwork. Some of the characteristics of high-performing interprofessional teams described in this review are also evident in effective teams in the community rehabilitation and intermediate care setting. These characteristics may well be pertinent to other settings, and so provide a useful foundation for future investigations.",
keywords = "Interprofessional collaborative practice, Interprofessional teamworking, Trauma setting",
author = "Molly Courtenay and Susan Nancarrow and Dawson, {David L}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1186/1478-4491-11-57",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Human Resources for Health",
issn = "1478-4491",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting

T2 - A scoping review

AU - Courtenay, Molly

AU - Nancarrow, Susan

AU - Dawson, David L

PY - 2013/11/5

Y1 - 2013/11/5

N2 - Approximately 70 to 80% of healthcare errors are due to poor team communication and understanding. High-risk environments such as the trauma setting (which covers a broad spectrum of departments in acute services) are where the majority of these errors occur. Despite the emphasis on interprofessional collaborative practice and patient safety, interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting has received little attention. This paper presents the findings of a scoping review designed to identify the extent and nature of this literature in this setting. The MEDLINE (via OVID, using keywords and MeSH in OVID), and PubMed (via NCBI using MeSH), and CINAHL databases were searched from January 2000 to April 2013 for results of interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting. A hand search was conducted by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles. In total, 24 published articles were identified for inclusion in the review. Studies could be categorized into three main areas, and within each area were a number of themes: 1) descriptions of the organization of trauma teams (themes included interaction between team members, and leadership); 2) descriptions of team composition and structure (themes included maintaining team stability and core team members); and 3) evaluation of team work interventions (themes included activities in practice and activities in the classroom setting).Descriptive studies highlighted the fluid nature of team processes, the shared mental models, and the need for teamwork and communication. Evaluative studies placed a greater emphasis on specialized roles and individual tasks and activities. This reflects a multiprofessional as opposed to an interprofessional model of teamwork. Some of the characteristics of high-performing interprofessional teams described in this review are also evident in effective teams in the community rehabilitation and intermediate care setting. These characteristics may well be pertinent to other settings, and so provide a useful foundation for future investigations.

AB - Approximately 70 to 80% of healthcare errors are due to poor team communication and understanding. High-risk environments such as the trauma setting (which covers a broad spectrum of departments in acute services) are where the majority of these errors occur. Despite the emphasis on interprofessional collaborative practice and patient safety, interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting has received little attention. This paper presents the findings of a scoping review designed to identify the extent and nature of this literature in this setting. The MEDLINE (via OVID, using keywords and MeSH in OVID), and PubMed (via NCBI using MeSH), and CINAHL databases were searched from January 2000 to April 2013 for results of interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting. A hand search was conducted by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles. In total, 24 published articles were identified for inclusion in the review. Studies could be categorized into three main areas, and within each area were a number of themes: 1) descriptions of the organization of trauma teams (themes included interaction between team members, and leadership); 2) descriptions of team composition and structure (themes included maintaining team stability and core team members); and 3) evaluation of team work interventions (themes included activities in practice and activities in the classroom setting).Descriptive studies highlighted the fluid nature of team processes, the shared mental models, and the need for teamwork and communication. Evaluative studies placed a greater emphasis on specialized roles and individual tasks and activities. This reflects a multiprofessional as opposed to an interprofessional model of teamwork. Some of the characteristics of high-performing interprofessional teams described in this review are also evident in effective teams in the community rehabilitation and intermediate care setting. These characteristics may well be pertinent to other settings, and so provide a useful foundation for future investigations.

KW - Interprofessional collaborative practice

KW - Interprofessional teamworking

KW - Trauma setting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887066412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887066412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1478-4491-11-57

DO - 10.1186/1478-4491-11-57

M3 - Article

C2 - 24188523

AN - SCOPUS:84887066412

VL - 11

JO - Human Resources for Health

JF - Human Resources for Health

SN - 1478-4491

IS - 1

M1 - 57

ER -