Interpretation of the results of OVER in the context of EVAR Trial, DREAM, and the EUROSTAR registry

Mahmoud B. Malas, Julie A. Freischlag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Several early studies have shown the benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair in reducing procedure-related mortality and morbidity of open aneurysm repair. Three prospective randomized trials have addressed the advantages and disadvantages of the two procedures. These studies had shown some conflicting findings in survival and complications. We reviewed the largest registry for endovascular abdominal aortic repair and the three randomized trials to evaluate the similarities and differences in their outcomes. Cross-comparison of operative, aneurysm-related and all-cause mortality is presented. Patient characteristics, device specifications, procedure morbidity and reintervention rate of each study are evaluated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-169
Number of pages5
JournalSeminars in Vascular Surgery
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretation of the results of OVER in the context of EVAR Trial, DREAM, and the EUROSTAR registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this