Interpretation of Multisegment Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Cats (1/2001-1/2011)

W. L. Ybarra, Lynelle R Johnson, T. L. Drazenovich, Eric G Johnson, William Vernau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cytologic results from bronchoscopic BAL in cats with naturally occurring respiratory disease have not been reported, and the clinical utility of multisegment lavage has not been evaluated. Hypothesis: BAL cytology from 2 separate lung segments in cats will have similar cell counts, cytologic interpretation, or both. Animals: Eighty-seven cases in 85 cats (2 examined twice) with naturally occurring lower respiratory disease. Methods: A combined prospective/retrospective evaluation of all cats with multisegment BAL was performed. BAL fluid was evaluated for total nucleated cell counts, differential cell counts, and cytologic characteristics at each lavage site. BAL fluid was categorized as eosinophilic, neutrophilic, lymphocytic, hypercellular, or mixed. Radiographs were assessed for diffuse or focal disease. Results: Clinical diagnoses included inflammatory airway disease (n = 63), pneumonia (n = 15), neoplasia (n = 6), and undetermined (n = 3). Total nucleated cell counts varied between sites regardless of radiographic evidence of focal or diffuse radiographic disease. In 28/87 cases (32%), cell counts differed between lavage sites by 2.2-40 fold. BAL yielded similar cytologic interpretation of inflammation in 45/87 (52%) cases. In 8/14 cases that had BAL performed at the site of a focal radiographic infiltrate, as well as at a site of diffuse infiltrates, the same inflammatory interpretation was made at each site. Conclusions and clinical importance: Total and differential cell counts in BAL fluid often differ between lung segments in cats with lower respiratory disease, and caution is warranted when using a single BAL cytology to define the inflammatory response in cats with spontaneously occurring lower respiratory tract disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1281-1287
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Dimercaprol
Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Cats
cats
respiratory tract diseases
Cell Count
Therapeutic Irrigation
cells
cell biology
inflammation
lungs
Cell Biology
pneumonia
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Lung
neoplasms
Pneumonia
Inflammation
fluids
animals

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Cytology
  • Pneumonia
  • Respiratory endoscopy
  • Thoracic radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Interpretation of Multisegment Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Cats (1/2001-1/2011). / Ybarra, W. L.; Johnson, Lynelle R; Drazenovich, T. L.; Johnson, Eric G; Vernau, William.

In: Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 6, 11.2012, p. 1281-1287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0791a6bb74e54e71ac7035b6972e27fd,
title = "Interpretation of Multisegment Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Cats (1/2001-1/2011)",
abstract = "Background: Cytologic results from bronchoscopic BAL in cats with naturally occurring respiratory disease have not been reported, and the clinical utility of multisegment lavage has not been evaluated. Hypothesis: BAL cytology from 2 separate lung segments in cats will have similar cell counts, cytologic interpretation, or both. Animals: Eighty-seven cases in 85 cats (2 examined twice) with naturally occurring lower respiratory disease. Methods: A combined prospective/retrospective evaluation of all cats with multisegment BAL was performed. BAL fluid was evaluated for total nucleated cell counts, differential cell counts, and cytologic characteristics at each lavage site. BAL fluid was categorized as eosinophilic, neutrophilic, lymphocytic, hypercellular, or mixed. Radiographs were assessed for diffuse or focal disease. Results: Clinical diagnoses included inflammatory airway disease (n = 63), pneumonia (n = 15), neoplasia (n = 6), and undetermined (n = 3). Total nucleated cell counts varied between sites regardless of radiographic evidence of focal or diffuse radiographic disease. In 28/87 cases (32{\%}), cell counts differed between lavage sites by 2.2-40 fold. BAL yielded similar cytologic interpretation of inflammation in 45/87 (52{\%}) cases. In 8/14 cases that had BAL performed at the site of a focal radiographic infiltrate, as well as at a site of diffuse infiltrates, the same inflammatory interpretation was made at each site. Conclusions and clinical importance: Total and differential cell counts in BAL fluid often differ between lung segments in cats with lower respiratory disease, and caution is warranted when using a single BAL cytology to define the inflammatory response in cats with spontaneously occurring lower respiratory tract disease.",
keywords = "Asthma, Cytology, Pneumonia, Respiratory endoscopy, Thoracic radiology",
author = "Ybarra, {W. L.} and Johnson, {Lynelle R} and Drazenovich, {T. L.} and Johnson, {Eric G} and William Vernau",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.01016.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1281--1287",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine",
issn = "0891-6640",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation of Multisegment Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Cats (1/2001-1/2011)

AU - Ybarra, W. L.

AU - Johnson, Lynelle R

AU - Drazenovich, T. L.

AU - Johnson, Eric G

AU - Vernau, William

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Background: Cytologic results from bronchoscopic BAL in cats with naturally occurring respiratory disease have not been reported, and the clinical utility of multisegment lavage has not been evaluated. Hypothesis: BAL cytology from 2 separate lung segments in cats will have similar cell counts, cytologic interpretation, or both. Animals: Eighty-seven cases in 85 cats (2 examined twice) with naturally occurring lower respiratory disease. Methods: A combined prospective/retrospective evaluation of all cats with multisegment BAL was performed. BAL fluid was evaluated for total nucleated cell counts, differential cell counts, and cytologic characteristics at each lavage site. BAL fluid was categorized as eosinophilic, neutrophilic, lymphocytic, hypercellular, or mixed. Radiographs were assessed for diffuse or focal disease. Results: Clinical diagnoses included inflammatory airway disease (n = 63), pneumonia (n = 15), neoplasia (n = 6), and undetermined (n = 3). Total nucleated cell counts varied between sites regardless of radiographic evidence of focal or diffuse radiographic disease. In 28/87 cases (32%), cell counts differed between lavage sites by 2.2-40 fold. BAL yielded similar cytologic interpretation of inflammation in 45/87 (52%) cases. In 8/14 cases that had BAL performed at the site of a focal radiographic infiltrate, as well as at a site of diffuse infiltrates, the same inflammatory interpretation was made at each site. Conclusions and clinical importance: Total and differential cell counts in BAL fluid often differ between lung segments in cats with lower respiratory disease, and caution is warranted when using a single BAL cytology to define the inflammatory response in cats with spontaneously occurring lower respiratory tract disease.

AB - Background: Cytologic results from bronchoscopic BAL in cats with naturally occurring respiratory disease have not been reported, and the clinical utility of multisegment lavage has not been evaluated. Hypothesis: BAL cytology from 2 separate lung segments in cats will have similar cell counts, cytologic interpretation, or both. Animals: Eighty-seven cases in 85 cats (2 examined twice) with naturally occurring lower respiratory disease. Methods: A combined prospective/retrospective evaluation of all cats with multisegment BAL was performed. BAL fluid was evaluated for total nucleated cell counts, differential cell counts, and cytologic characteristics at each lavage site. BAL fluid was categorized as eosinophilic, neutrophilic, lymphocytic, hypercellular, or mixed. Radiographs were assessed for diffuse or focal disease. Results: Clinical diagnoses included inflammatory airway disease (n = 63), pneumonia (n = 15), neoplasia (n = 6), and undetermined (n = 3). Total nucleated cell counts varied between sites regardless of radiographic evidence of focal or diffuse radiographic disease. In 28/87 cases (32%), cell counts differed between lavage sites by 2.2-40 fold. BAL yielded similar cytologic interpretation of inflammation in 45/87 (52%) cases. In 8/14 cases that had BAL performed at the site of a focal radiographic infiltrate, as well as at a site of diffuse infiltrates, the same inflammatory interpretation was made at each site. Conclusions and clinical importance: Total and differential cell counts in BAL fluid often differ between lung segments in cats with lower respiratory disease, and caution is warranted when using a single BAL cytology to define the inflammatory response in cats with spontaneously occurring lower respiratory tract disease.

KW - Asthma

KW - Cytology

KW - Pneumonia

KW - Respiratory endoscopy

KW - Thoracic radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869866728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869866728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.01016.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.01016.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23106475

AN - SCOPUS:84869866728

VL - 26

SP - 1281

EP - 1287

JO - Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

SN - 0891-6640

IS - 6

ER -