Internet-Based Patient Survey on Urolithiasis Treatment and Patient Satisfaction

Thenappan Chandrasekar, Manoj Monga, Mike Nguyen, Roger Low

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We created an Internet-based survey of patients treated for urolithiasis to evaluate for trends in treatment, outcome, and patient satisfaction and to establish internet surveys as a feasible medium for future research of patient urolithiasis treatment experiences. Materials and Methods: We used the website "kidneystoners.org" to disseminate the online survey, which queried respondents on treatment type, outcome, and satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment type and outcome. Chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare responses between treatment types. Results: Four hundred forty-three respondents completed the survey. The majority (46%) were treated ureteroscopically, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL, 25%) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7%). Other treatments included spontaneous passage (13%), medical expulsive therapy (7%), and home remedies (2%). Sixty-four percent of respondents deemed their treatment "successful," while 36% reported their treatment as either "partially successful" or "unsuccessful." Unsuccessful treatment was more likely for SWL (17%) and home remedies (14%) (p=0.002). Most respondents (52%) reported being either satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment choice. Satisfaction did not vary significantly by treatment type, but was significantly associated with treatment success (mean satisfaction 3.8/5 for "successful" vs 1.9/5 for "unsuccessful" treatment; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Use of the Internet allows rapid gathering of patient information from a large geographic distribution. Our survey is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating an increased use of ureteroscopy to treat both renal and ureteral calculi. In general, patients are satisfied with treatment outcomes despite a large percentage of people reporting needing to have secondary procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)725-729
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Urolithiasis
Patient Satisfaction
Internet
Therapeutics
Traditional Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Ureteral Calculi
Ureteroscopy
Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Kidney Calculi
Lithotripsy
Analysis of Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Internet-Based Patient Survey on Urolithiasis Treatment and Patient Satisfaction. / Chandrasekar, Thenappan; Monga, Manoj; Nguyen, Mike; Low, Roger.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 725-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chandrasekar, Thenappan ; Monga, Manoj ; Nguyen, Mike ; Low, Roger. / Internet-Based Patient Survey on Urolithiasis Treatment and Patient Satisfaction. In: Journal of Endourology. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 725-729.
@article{34b14246d9ab483786b48bd992e5575c,
title = "Internet-Based Patient Survey on Urolithiasis Treatment and Patient Satisfaction",
abstract = "Purpose: We created an Internet-based survey of patients treated for urolithiasis to evaluate for trends in treatment, outcome, and patient satisfaction and to establish internet surveys as a feasible medium for future research of patient urolithiasis treatment experiences. Materials and Methods: We used the website {"}kidneystoners.org{"} to disseminate the online survey, which queried respondents on treatment type, outcome, and satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment type and outcome. Chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare responses between treatment types. Results: Four hundred forty-three respondents completed the survey. The majority (46{\%}) were treated ureteroscopically, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL, 25{\%}) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7{\%}). Other treatments included spontaneous passage (13{\%}), medical expulsive therapy (7{\%}), and home remedies (2{\%}). Sixty-four percent of respondents deemed their treatment {"}successful,{"} while 36{\%} reported their treatment as either {"}partially successful{"} or {"}unsuccessful.{"} Unsuccessful treatment was more likely for SWL (17{\%}) and home remedies (14{\%}) (p=0.002). Most respondents (52{\%}) reported being either satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment choice. Satisfaction did not vary significantly by treatment type, but was significantly associated with treatment success (mean satisfaction 3.8/5 for {"}successful{"} vs 1.9/5 for {"}unsuccessful{"} treatment; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Use of the Internet allows rapid gathering of patient information from a large geographic distribution. Our survey is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating an increased use of ureteroscopy to treat both renal and ureteral calculi. In general, patients are satisfied with treatment outcomes despite a large percentage of people reporting needing to have secondary procedures.",
author = "Thenappan Chandrasekar and Manoj Monga and Mike Nguyen and Roger Low",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2014.0643",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "725--729",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internet-Based Patient Survey on Urolithiasis Treatment and Patient Satisfaction

AU - Chandrasekar, Thenappan

AU - Monga, Manoj

AU - Nguyen, Mike

AU - Low, Roger

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Purpose: We created an Internet-based survey of patients treated for urolithiasis to evaluate for trends in treatment, outcome, and patient satisfaction and to establish internet surveys as a feasible medium for future research of patient urolithiasis treatment experiences. Materials and Methods: We used the website "kidneystoners.org" to disseminate the online survey, which queried respondents on treatment type, outcome, and satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment type and outcome. Chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare responses between treatment types. Results: Four hundred forty-three respondents completed the survey. The majority (46%) were treated ureteroscopically, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL, 25%) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7%). Other treatments included spontaneous passage (13%), medical expulsive therapy (7%), and home remedies (2%). Sixty-four percent of respondents deemed their treatment "successful," while 36% reported their treatment as either "partially successful" or "unsuccessful." Unsuccessful treatment was more likely for SWL (17%) and home remedies (14%) (p=0.002). Most respondents (52%) reported being either satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment choice. Satisfaction did not vary significantly by treatment type, but was significantly associated with treatment success (mean satisfaction 3.8/5 for "successful" vs 1.9/5 for "unsuccessful" treatment; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Use of the Internet allows rapid gathering of patient information from a large geographic distribution. Our survey is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating an increased use of ureteroscopy to treat both renal and ureteral calculi. In general, patients are satisfied with treatment outcomes despite a large percentage of people reporting needing to have secondary procedures.

AB - Purpose: We created an Internet-based survey of patients treated for urolithiasis to evaluate for trends in treatment, outcome, and patient satisfaction and to establish internet surveys as a feasible medium for future research of patient urolithiasis treatment experiences. Materials and Methods: We used the website "kidneystoners.org" to disseminate the online survey, which queried respondents on treatment type, outcome, and satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment type and outcome. Chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare responses between treatment types. Results: Four hundred forty-three respondents completed the survey. The majority (46%) were treated ureteroscopically, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL, 25%) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7%). Other treatments included spontaneous passage (13%), medical expulsive therapy (7%), and home remedies (2%). Sixty-four percent of respondents deemed their treatment "successful," while 36% reported their treatment as either "partially successful" or "unsuccessful." Unsuccessful treatment was more likely for SWL (17%) and home remedies (14%) (p=0.002). Most respondents (52%) reported being either satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment choice. Satisfaction did not vary significantly by treatment type, but was significantly associated with treatment success (mean satisfaction 3.8/5 for "successful" vs 1.9/5 for "unsuccessful" treatment; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Use of the Internet allows rapid gathering of patient information from a large geographic distribution. Our survey is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating an increased use of ureteroscopy to treat both renal and ureteral calculi. In general, patients are satisfied with treatment outcomes despite a large percentage of people reporting needing to have secondary procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931070616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931070616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2014.0643

DO - 10.1089/end.2014.0643

M3 - Article

C2 - 25365030

AN - SCOPUS:84931070616

VL - 29

SP - 725

EP - 729

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 6

ER -