Interlaced versus progressive readout of television cameras for digital radiographic acquisitions

J Anthony Seibert, D. H. Barr, D. J. Borger, H. H. Hines, H. G. Bogren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparison was made of two methods for reading the TV camera target for digital radiographic acquisition, interlaced and progressive readout. Experiments were performed with a plumbicon TV camera to measure x-ray exposure requirements and resolution capabilities after readout for the two modes. Real time digital (30 frames per second, 2562 matrix) and single-frame electrocardiogram gated images of the contrast-filled coronary arteries in a dog were acquired with both formats. Results demonstrate a reduction in patient exposure of up to four times for single-frame progressive readout images over interlaced acquisition for static images of comparable quality. Imaging of rapid motion objects (e.g., coronary arteries) with interlaced TV scanning results in 'scalloping' of edges and resolution degradation. The short pulse width capability of progressive readout eliminates motion blurring and preserves object detail. Progressive readout is the preferred mode of TV camera readout for most digital radiographic applications due to more flexible x-ray techniques, superior images, and total utilization of the input x-ray flux for lower patient exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)703-707
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Physics
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Television
X-Rays
Coronary Vessels
Reading
Electrocardiography
Dogs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Interlaced versus progressive readout of television cameras for digital radiographic acquisitions. / Seibert, J Anthony; Barr, D. H.; Borger, D. J.; Hines, H. H.; Bogren, H. G.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1984, p. 703-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seibert, J Anthony ; Barr, D. H. ; Borger, D. J. ; Hines, H. H. ; Bogren, H. G. / Interlaced versus progressive readout of television cameras for digital radiographic acquisitions. In: Medical Physics. 1984 ; Vol. 11, No. 5. pp. 703-707.
@article{6f9880c7019d4686966ba033cc0d830c,
title = "Interlaced versus progressive readout of television cameras for digital radiographic acquisitions",
abstract = "A comparison was made of two methods for reading the TV camera target for digital radiographic acquisition, interlaced and progressive readout. Experiments were performed with a plumbicon TV camera to measure x-ray exposure requirements and resolution capabilities after readout for the two modes. Real time digital (30 frames per second, 2562 matrix) and single-frame electrocardiogram gated images of the contrast-filled coronary arteries in a dog were acquired with both formats. Results demonstrate a reduction in patient exposure of up to four times for single-frame progressive readout images over interlaced acquisition for static images of comparable quality. Imaging of rapid motion objects (e.g., coronary arteries) with interlaced TV scanning results in 'scalloping' of edges and resolution degradation. The short pulse width capability of progressive readout eliminates motion blurring and preserves object detail. Progressive readout is the preferred mode of TV camera readout for most digital radiographic applications due to more flexible x-ray techniques, superior images, and total utilization of the input x-ray flux for lower patient exposure.",
author = "Seibert, {J Anthony} and Barr, {D. H.} and Borger, {D. J.} and Hines, {H. H.} and Bogren, {H. G.}",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1118/1.595641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "703--707",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interlaced versus progressive readout of television cameras for digital radiographic acquisitions

AU - Seibert, J Anthony

AU - Barr, D. H.

AU - Borger, D. J.

AU - Hines, H. H.

AU - Bogren, H. G.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - A comparison was made of two methods for reading the TV camera target for digital radiographic acquisition, interlaced and progressive readout. Experiments were performed with a plumbicon TV camera to measure x-ray exposure requirements and resolution capabilities after readout for the two modes. Real time digital (30 frames per second, 2562 matrix) and single-frame electrocardiogram gated images of the contrast-filled coronary arteries in a dog were acquired with both formats. Results demonstrate a reduction in patient exposure of up to four times for single-frame progressive readout images over interlaced acquisition for static images of comparable quality. Imaging of rapid motion objects (e.g., coronary arteries) with interlaced TV scanning results in 'scalloping' of edges and resolution degradation. The short pulse width capability of progressive readout eliminates motion blurring and preserves object detail. Progressive readout is the preferred mode of TV camera readout for most digital radiographic applications due to more flexible x-ray techniques, superior images, and total utilization of the input x-ray flux for lower patient exposure.

AB - A comparison was made of two methods for reading the TV camera target for digital radiographic acquisition, interlaced and progressive readout. Experiments were performed with a plumbicon TV camera to measure x-ray exposure requirements and resolution capabilities after readout for the two modes. Real time digital (30 frames per second, 2562 matrix) and single-frame electrocardiogram gated images of the contrast-filled coronary arteries in a dog were acquired with both formats. Results demonstrate a reduction in patient exposure of up to four times for single-frame progressive readout images over interlaced acquisition for static images of comparable quality. Imaging of rapid motion objects (e.g., coronary arteries) with interlaced TV scanning results in 'scalloping' of edges and resolution degradation. The short pulse width capability of progressive readout eliminates motion blurring and preserves object detail. Progressive readout is the preferred mode of TV camera readout for most digital radiographic applications due to more flexible x-ray techniques, superior images, and total utilization of the input x-ray flux for lower patient exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021679350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021679350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.595641

DO - 10.1118/1.595641

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 703

EP - 707

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 5

ER -