Inter-clinician agreement on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical charts

Karia Zadnik, Mark J Mannis, H. S. Kim, Mark Miller, Margaret Marquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-observer repeatability of retrospective chart reviews. Methods. Retrospective abstraction of corneal transplant patients' medical records by two independent observers was performed at the University of California, Davis, Department of Ophthalmology, Sacramento, CA. The sample consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, and the primary outcome measure was the degree of agreement between the 2 independent observers on clinical ocular data abstracted from patients' medical charts. Results. Even when given specific criteria for abstraction of data from patients' medical charts, inexperienced but trained observers exhibited a small degree of disagreement (range 0 to 12 %) on patient demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, and date of birth) to be used for data analysis. Larger amounts of disagreement (range 3 to 26%) were found on frequently occurring variables (e.g., predisposing ocular conditions, surgical complications, and classification of corneal staining). Conclusions. Based on these data, inter-observer repeatability for retrospective chart review studies is good, but investigators using this study methodology must be quite specific about the data to be collected and should be aware of standardization techniques to enhance observer repeatability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)813-816
Number of pages4
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume75
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Penetrating Keratoplasty
Ophthalmology
Medical Records
Research Personnel
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Parturition
Staining and Labeling
Transplants

Keywords

  • Abstracting charts
  • Clinical research
  • Medical records
  • Repeatability
  • Retrospective study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Inter-clinician agreement on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical charts. / Zadnik, Karia; Mannis, Mark J; Kim, H. S.; Miller, Mark; Marquez, Margaret.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 75, No. 11, 11.1998, p. 813-816.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zadnik, K, Mannis, MJ, Kim, HS, Miller, M & Marquez, M 1998, 'Inter-clinician agreement on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical charts', Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 813-816.
Zadnik, Karia ; Mannis, Mark J ; Kim, H. S. ; Miller, Mark ; Marquez, Margaret. / Inter-clinician agreement on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical charts. In: Optometry and Vision Science. 1998 ; Vol. 75, No. 11. pp. 813-816.
@article{aac5e00d268b4b9c8ffa5b44bca617cc,
title = "Inter-clinician agreement on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical charts",
abstract = "Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-observer repeatability of retrospective chart reviews. Methods. Retrospective abstraction of corneal transplant patients' medical records by two independent observers was performed at the University of California, Davis, Department of Ophthalmology, Sacramento, CA. The sample consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, and the primary outcome measure was the degree of agreement between the 2 independent observers on clinical ocular data abstracted from patients' medical charts. Results. Even when given specific criteria for abstraction of data from patients' medical charts, inexperienced but trained observers exhibited a small degree of disagreement (range 0 to 12 {\%}) on patient demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, and date of birth) to be used for data analysis. Larger amounts of disagreement (range 3 to 26{\%}) were found on frequently occurring variables (e.g., predisposing ocular conditions, surgical complications, and classification of corneal staining). Conclusions. Based on these data, inter-observer repeatability for retrospective chart review studies is good, but investigators using this study methodology must be quite specific about the data to be collected and should be aware of standardization techniques to enhance observer repeatability.",
keywords = "Abstracting charts, Clinical research, Medical records, Repeatability, Retrospective study",
author = "Karia Zadnik and Mannis, {Mark J} and Kim, {H. S.} and Mark Miller and Margaret Marquez",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "813--816",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inter-clinician agreement on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical charts

AU - Zadnik, Karia

AU - Mannis, Mark J

AU - Kim, H. S.

AU - Miller, Mark

AU - Marquez, Margaret

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-observer repeatability of retrospective chart reviews. Methods. Retrospective abstraction of corneal transplant patients' medical records by two independent observers was performed at the University of California, Davis, Department of Ophthalmology, Sacramento, CA. The sample consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, and the primary outcome measure was the degree of agreement between the 2 independent observers on clinical ocular data abstracted from patients' medical charts. Results. Even when given specific criteria for abstraction of data from patients' medical charts, inexperienced but trained observers exhibited a small degree of disagreement (range 0 to 12 %) on patient demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, and date of birth) to be used for data analysis. Larger amounts of disagreement (range 3 to 26%) were found on frequently occurring variables (e.g., predisposing ocular conditions, surgical complications, and classification of corneal staining). Conclusions. Based on these data, inter-observer repeatability for retrospective chart review studies is good, but investigators using this study methodology must be quite specific about the data to be collected and should be aware of standardization techniques to enhance observer repeatability.

AB - Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-observer repeatability of retrospective chart reviews. Methods. Retrospective abstraction of corneal transplant patients' medical records by two independent observers was performed at the University of California, Davis, Department of Ophthalmology, Sacramento, CA. The sample consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, and the primary outcome measure was the degree of agreement between the 2 independent observers on clinical ocular data abstracted from patients' medical charts. Results. Even when given specific criteria for abstraction of data from patients' medical charts, inexperienced but trained observers exhibited a small degree of disagreement (range 0 to 12 %) on patient demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, and date of birth) to be used for data analysis. Larger amounts of disagreement (range 3 to 26%) were found on frequently occurring variables (e.g., predisposing ocular conditions, surgical complications, and classification of corneal staining). Conclusions. Based on these data, inter-observer repeatability for retrospective chart review studies is good, but investigators using this study methodology must be quite specific about the data to be collected and should be aware of standardization techniques to enhance observer repeatability.

KW - Abstracting charts

KW - Clinical research

KW - Medical records

KW - Repeatability

KW - Retrospective study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032213045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032213045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9848835

AN - SCOPUS:0032213045

VL - 75

SP - 813

EP - 816

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 11

ER -