Integrating Science and Engineering to Implement Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Settings

Shinyi Wu, Naihua Duan, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Richard L Kravitz, Richard R. Owen, J. Greer Sullivan, Albert W. Wu, Paul Di Capua, Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Integrating two distinct and complementary paradigms, science and engineering, may produce more effective outcomes for the implementation of evidence-based practices in health care settings. Science formalizes and tests innovations, whereas engineering customizes and optimizes how the innovation is applied tailoring to accommodate local conditions. Together they may accelerate the creation of an evidence-based healthcare system that works effectively in specific health care settings. We give examples of applying engineering methods for better quality, more efficient, and safer implementation of clinical practices, medical devices, and health services systems. A specific example was applying systems engineering design that orchestrated people, process, data, decision-making, and communication through a technology application to implement evidence-based depression care among low-income patients with diabetes. We recommend that leading journals recognize the fundamental role of engineering in implementation research, to improve understanding of design elements that create a better fit between program elements and local context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)588-592
Number of pages5
JournalAdministration and Policy in Mental Health
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 2015

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Delivery of Health Care
Health Services
Decision Making
Communication
Depression
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • Evidence-based practices
  • Generalizable knowledge
  • Implementation engineering
  • Implementation science
  • Knowledge generation
  • Local knowledge
  • Science and engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Phychiatric Mental Health

Cite this

Integrating Science and Engineering to Implement Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Settings. / Wu, Shinyi; Duan, Naihua; Wisdom, Jennifer P.; Kravitz, Richard L; Owen, Richard R.; Sullivan, J. Greer; Wu, Albert W.; Di Capua, Paul; Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton.

In: Administration and Policy in Mental Health, Vol. 42, No. 5, 22.09.2015, p. 588-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Shinyi ; Duan, Naihua ; Wisdom, Jennifer P. ; Kravitz, Richard L ; Owen, Richard R. ; Sullivan, J. Greer ; Wu, Albert W. ; Di Capua, Paul ; Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton. / Integrating Science and Engineering to Implement Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Settings. In: Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2015 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 588-592.
@article{32b2717f30ff441e9ea2d132ca4eae2d,
title = "Integrating Science and Engineering to Implement Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Settings",
abstract = "Integrating two distinct and complementary paradigms, science and engineering, may produce more effective outcomes for the implementation of evidence-based practices in health care settings. Science formalizes and tests innovations, whereas engineering customizes and optimizes how the innovation is applied tailoring to accommodate local conditions. Together they may accelerate the creation of an evidence-based healthcare system that works effectively in specific health care settings. We give examples of applying engineering methods for better quality, more efficient, and safer implementation of clinical practices, medical devices, and health services systems. A specific example was applying systems engineering design that orchestrated people, process, data, decision-making, and communication through a technology application to implement evidence-based depression care among low-income patients with diabetes. We recommend that leading journals recognize the fundamental role of engineering in implementation research, to improve understanding of design elements that create a better fit between program elements and local context.",
keywords = "Evidence-based practices, Generalizable knowledge, Implementation engineering, Implementation science, Knowledge generation, Local knowledge, Science and engineering",
author = "Shinyi Wu and Naihua Duan and Wisdom, {Jennifer P.} and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Owen, {Richard R.} and Sullivan, {J. Greer} and Wu, {Albert W.} and {Di Capua}, Paul and Hoagwood, {Kimberly Eaton}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1007/s10488-014-0593-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "588--592",
journal = "Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research",
issn = "0894-587X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating Science and Engineering to Implement Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Settings

AU - Wu, Shinyi

AU - Duan, Naihua

AU - Wisdom, Jennifer P.

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Owen, Richard R.

AU - Sullivan, J. Greer

AU - Wu, Albert W.

AU - Di Capua, Paul

AU - Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton

PY - 2015/9/22

Y1 - 2015/9/22

N2 - Integrating two distinct and complementary paradigms, science and engineering, may produce more effective outcomes for the implementation of evidence-based practices in health care settings. Science formalizes and tests innovations, whereas engineering customizes and optimizes how the innovation is applied tailoring to accommodate local conditions. Together they may accelerate the creation of an evidence-based healthcare system that works effectively in specific health care settings. We give examples of applying engineering methods for better quality, more efficient, and safer implementation of clinical practices, medical devices, and health services systems. A specific example was applying systems engineering design that orchestrated people, process, data, decision-making, and communication through a technology application to implement evidence-based depression care among low-income patients with diabetes. We recommend that leading journals recognize the fundamental role of engineering in implementation research, to improve understanding of design elements that create a better fit between program elements and local context.

AB - Integrating two distinct and complementary paradigms, science and engineering, may produce more effective outcomes for the implementation of evidence-based practices in health care settings. Science formalizes and tests innovations, whereas engineering customizes and optimizes how the innovation is applied tailoring to accommodate local conditions. Together they may accelerate the creation of an evidence-based healthcare system that works effectively in specific health care settings. We give examples of applying engineering methods for better quality, more efficient, and safer implementation of clinical practices, medical devices, and health services systems. A specific example was applying systems engineering design that orchestrated people, process, data, decision-making, and communication through a technology application to implement evidence-based depression care among low-income patients with diabetes. We recommend that leading journals recognize the fundamental role of engineering in implementation research, to improve understanding of design elements that create a better fit between program elements and local context.

KW - Evidence-based practices

KW - Generalizable knowledge

KW - Implementation engineering

KW - Implementation science

KW - Knowledge generation

KW - Local knowledge

KW - Science and engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939531558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939531558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10488-014-0593-x

DO - 10.1007/s10488-014-0593-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 25217100

AN - SCOPUS:84939531558

VL - 42

SP - 588

EP - 592

JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

SN - 0894-587X

IS - 5

ER -