Inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism

Sally J Ozonoff, David L. Strayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

169 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism (n = 13) and normally developing controls (n = 13) matched on age and IQ. Tasks measuring motor and cognitive components of inhibition were administered to both groups. On the Stop-Signal paradigm, children with autism were able to inhibit motor responses to neutral and prepotent stimuli as well as control subjects. On the Negative Priming task, the groups were equally capable of inhibiting processing of irrelevant distractor stimuli in a visual display. Results suggest that at least two components of inhibition are spared in individuals with autism, standing in contrast to flexibility and other executive deficits that have been found in previous studies. These findings may help distinguish children with autism from those with other neurodevelopmental conditions that involve executive dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-78
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism. / Ozonoff, Sally J; Strayer, David L.

In: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1997, p. 59-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa5a62344cfa46e29390c8d61c2a0879,
title = "Inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism",
abstract = "This study examined inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism (n = 13) and normally developing controls (n = 13) matched on age and IQ. Tasks measuring motor and cognitive components of inhibition were administered to both groups. On the Stop-Signal paradigm, children with autism were able to inhibit motor responses to neutral and prepotent stimuli as well as control subjects. On the Negative Priming task, the groups were equally capable of inhibiting processing of irrelevant distractor stimuli in a visual display. Results suggest that at least two components of inhibition are spared in individuals with autism, standing in contrast to flexibility and other executive deficits that have been found in previous studies. These findings may help distinguish children with autism from those with other neurodevelopmental conditions that involve executive dysfunction.",
author = "Ozonoff, {Sally J} and Strayer, {David L.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1023/A:1025821222046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "59--78",
journal = "Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders",
issn = "0162-3257",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism

AU - Ozonoff, Sally J

AU - Strayer, David L.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This study examined inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism (n = 13) and normally developing controls (n = 13) matched on age and IQ. Tasks measuring motor and cognitive components of inhibition were administered to both groups. On the Stop-Signal paradigm, children with autism were able to inhibit motor responses to neutral and prepotent stimuli as well as control subjects. On the Negative Priming task, the groups were equally capable of inhibiting processing of irrelevant distractor stimuli in a visual display. Results suggest that at least two components of inhibition are spared in individuals with autism, standing in contrast to flexibility and other executive deficits that have been found in previous studies. These findings may help distinguish children with autism from those with other neurodevelopmental conditions that involve executive dysfunction.

AB - This study examined inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism (n = 13) and normally developing controls (n = 13) matched on age and IQ. Tasks measuring motor and cognitive components of inhibition were administered to both groups. On the Stop-Signal paradigm, children with autism were able to inhibit motor responses to neutral and prepotent stimuli as well as control subjects. On the Negative Priming task, the groups were equally capable of inhibiting processing of irrelevant distractor stimuli in a visual display. Results suggest that at least two components of inhibition are spared in individuals with autism, standing in contrast to flexibility and other executive deficits that have been found in previous studies. These findings may help distinguish children with autism from those with other neurodevelopmental conditions that involve executive dysfunction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031019459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031019459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1025821222046

DO - 10.1023/A:1025821222046

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 59

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

JF - Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

SN - 0162-3257

IS - 1

ER -