Influence of Radiographic Positioning on Canine Sacroiliac and Lumbosacral Angle Measurements

Susan Jones, Mason Savage, Brian Naughton, Susheela Singh, Ian Robertson, Simon C. Roe, Denis J Marcellin-Little, Kyle G. Mathews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:  To evaluate the influence of radiographic malpositioning on canine sacroiliac and lumbosacral inclination angles.

METHODS:  Using canine cadavers, lateral pelvic radiographs were acquired with the radiographic beam in a neutral position and then rotated 5, 10 and 15° to mimic rotational malpositioning. The focal point of the beam was then focused over the abdomen and again over mid-diaphysis of the femur to mimic an abdominal or femoral radiographic study.

RESULTS:  Five degrees of rotational malpositioning did not influence measurements of sacroiliac or lumbosacral inclination, but malpositioning by more than 5° led to a significant decrease in both sacroiliac and lumbosacral angles. Moving the focal point to the femur significantly decreased the measured lumbosacral angle. Abdominally centred radiographs had no effect on lumbosacral and sacroiliac angle measurements.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:  When evaluating canine lumbosacral and sacroiliac angles radiographically, pelvic rotation of more than 5° should be avoided as should the use of lateral radiographs centred over the femur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-36
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

femur
Femur
Canidae
dogs
Diaphyses
thighs
Thigh
Cadaver
abdomen
Abdomen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Influence of Radiographic Positioning on Canine Sacroiliac and Lumbosacral Angle Measurements. / Jones, Susan; Savage, Mason; Naughton, Brian; Singh, Susheela; Robertson, Ian; Roe, Simon C.; Marcellin-Little, Denis J; Mathews, Kyle G.

In: Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 30-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jones, Susan ; Savage, Mason ; Naughton, Brian ; Singh, Susheela ; Robertson, Ian ; Roe, Simon C. ; Marcellin-Little, Denis J ; Mathews, Kyle G. / Influence of Radiographic Positioning on Canine Sacroiliac and Lumbosacral Angle Measurements. In: Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 30-36.
@article{75eef6ce6c284b0b8a5fd02b2c413f4f,
title = "Influence of Radiographic Positioning on Canine Sacroiliac and Lumbosacral Angle Measurements",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:  To evaluate the influence of radiographic malpositioning on canine sacroiliac and lumbosacral inclination angles.METHODS:  Using canine cadavers, lateral pelvic radiographs were acquired with the radiographic beam in a neutral position and then rotated 5, 10 and 15° to mimic rotational malpositioning. The focal point of the beam was then focused over the abdomen and again over mid-diaphysis of the femur to mimic an abdominal or femoral radiographic study.RESULTS:  Five degrees of rotational malpositioning did not influence measurements of sacroiliac or lumbosacral inclination, but malpositioning by more than 5° led to a significant decrease in both sacroiliac and lumbosacral angles. Moving the focal point to the femur significantly decreased the measured lumbosacral angle. Abdominally centred radiographs had no effect on lumbosacral and sacroiliac angle measurements.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:  When evaluating canine lumbosacral and sacroiliac angles radiographically, pelvic rotation of more than 5° should be avoided as should the use of lateral radiographs centred over the femur.",
author = "Susan Jones and Mason Savage and Brian Naughton and Susheela Singh and Ian Robertson and Roe, {Simon C.} and Marcellin-Little, {Denis J} and Mathews, {Kyle G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3415/VCOT-17-04-0052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "30--36",
journal = "Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology",
issn = "0932-0814",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of Radiographic Positioning on Canine Sacroiliac and Lumbosacral Angle Measurements

AU - Jones, Susan

AU - Savage, Mason

AU - Naughton, Brian

AU - Singh, Susheela

AU - Robertson, Ian

AU - Roe, Simon C.

AU - Marcellin-Little, Denis J

AU - Mathews, Kyle G.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES:  To evaluate the influence of radiographic malpositioning on canine sacroiliac and lumbosacral inclination angles.METHODS:  Using canine cadavers, lateral pelvic radiographs were acquired with the radiographic beam in a neutral position and then rotated 5, 10 and 15° to mimic rotational malpositioning. The focal point of the beam was then focused over the abdomen and again over mid-diaphysis of the femur to mimic an abdominal or femoral radiographic study.RESULTS:  Five degrees of rotational malpositioning did not influence measurements of sacroiliac or lumbosacral inclination, but malpositioning by more than 5° led to a significant decrease in both sacroiliac and lumbosacral angles. Moving the focal point to the femur significantly decreased the measured lumbosacral angle. Abdominally centred radiographs had no effect on lumbosacral and sacroiliac angle measurements.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:  When evaluating canine lumbosacral and sacroiliac angles radiographically, pelvic rotation of more than 5° should be avoided as should the use of lateral radiographs centred over the femur.

AB - OBJECTIVES:  To evaluate the influence of radiographic malpositioning on canine sacroiliac and lumbosacral inclination angles.METHODS:  Using canine cadavers, lateral pelvic radiographs were acquired with the radiographic beam in a neutral position and then rotated 5, 10 and 15° to mimic rotational malpositioning. The focal point of the beam was then focused over the abdomen and again over mid-diaphysis of the femur to mimic an abdominal or femoral radiographic study.RESULTS:  Five degrees of rotational malpositioning did not influence measurements of sacroiliac or lumbosacral inclination, but malpositioning by more than 5° led to a significant decrease in both sacroiliac and lumbosacral angles. Moving the focal point to the femur significantly decreased the measured lumbosacral angle. Abdominally centred radiographs had no effect on lumbosacral and sacroiliac angle measurements.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:  When evaluating canine lumbosacral and sacroiliac angles radiographically, pelvic rotation of more than 5° should be avoided as should the use of lateral radiographs centred over the femur.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050630342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050630342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3415/VCOT-17-04-0052

DO - 10.3415/VCOT-17-04-0052

M3 - Article

C2 - 29325190

AN - SCOPUS:85050630342

VL - 31

SP - 30

EP - 36

JO - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

JF - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

SN - 0932-0814

IS - 1

ER -