Influence of patient coaching on analgesic treatment adjustment: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Richard L Kravitz, Daniel J Tancredi, Anthony F Jerant, Naomi Saito, Richard L. Street, Tim Grennan, Peter Franks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: For patients with cancer-related pain and their physicians, routine oncology visits are an opportunity to adjust the analgesic regimen and secure better pain control. However, treatment intensification occurs haphazardly in practice. Objectives: To estimate the effect of patient-centered tailored education and coaching (TEC) on the likelihood of analgesic treatment adjustment during oncology visits, and in turn, the influence of treatment adjustment on subsequent cancer pain control, we studied patients enrolled in a randomized trial of TEC. Methods: Just before a scheduled oncology visit, 258 patients with at least moderate baseline pain received TEC or control; just after the same visit, they reported on whether the physician recommended a new pain medicine or a change in dose of an existing medicine. Pain severity and pain-related impairment were measured two, six, and 12 weeks later. Results: Patients assigned to TEC were more likely than controls to report a change in the analgesic treatment regimen (60% vs. 36%, P < 0.01); significant effects persisted after adjustment for baseline pain, study site, and physician (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.55, 4.40, P < 0.01). In a mixed-effects repeated measures regression, analgesic change (but not TEC itself) was associated with a sustained decrease in pain severity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: TEC increases the likelihood of self-reported, physician-directed adjustments in analgesic prescribing, and treatment intensification is associated with better cancer pain outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)874-884
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Analgesics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Education
Physicians
Therapeutics
Medicine
Mentoring
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • analgesia
  • Cancer pain
  • pain management
  • palliative care
  • patient education
  • quality of care
  • therapeutic inertia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{a6ba99246e2b406c934393895e63a7fa,
title = "Influence of patient coaching on analgesic treatment adjustment: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Context: For patients with cancer-related pain and their physicians, routine oncology visits are an opportunity to adjust the analgesic regimen and secure better pain control. However, treatment intensification occurs haphazardly in practice. Objectives: To estimate the effect of patient-centered tailored education and coaching (TEC) on the likelihood of analgesic treatment adjustment during oncology visits, and in turn, the influence of treatment adjustment on subsequent cancer pain control, we studied patients enrolled in a randomized trial of TEC. Methods: Just before a scheduled oncology visit, 258 patients with at least moderate baseline pain received TEC or control; just after the same visit, they reported on whether the physician recommended a new pain medicine or a change in dose of an existing medicine. Pain severity and pain-related impairment were measured two, six, and 12 weeks later. Results: Patients assigned to TEC were more likely than controls to report a change in the analgesic treatment regimen (60{\%} vs. 36{\%}, P < 0.01); significant effects persisted after adjustment for baseline pain, study site, and physician (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95{\%} confidence interval 1.55, 4.40, P < 0.01). In a mixed-effects repeated measures regression, analgesic change (but not TEC itself) was associated with a sustained decrease in pain severity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: TEC increases the likelihood of self-reported, physician-directed adjustments in analgesic prescribing, and treatment intensification is associated with better cancer pain outcomes.",
keywords = "analgesia, Cancer pain, pain management, palliative care, patient education, quality of care, therapeutic inertia",
author = "Kravitz, {Richard L} and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and Jerant, {Anthony F} and Naomi Saito and Street, {Richard L.} and Tim Grennan and Peter Franks",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "874--884",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of patient coaching on analgesic treatment adjustment

T2 - Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Jerant, Anthony F

AU - Saito, Naomi

AU - Street, Richard L.

AU - Grennan, Tim

AU - Franks, Peter

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Context: For patients with cancer-related pain and their physicians, routine oncology visits are an opportunity to adjust the analgesic regimen and secure better pain control. However, treatment intensification occurs haphazardly in practice. Objectives: To estimate the effect of patient-centered tailored education and coaching (TEC) on the likelihood of analgesic treatment adjustment during oncology visits, and in turn, the influence of treatment adjustment on subsequent cancer pain control, we studied patients enrolled in a randomized trial of TEC. Methods: Just before a scheduled oncology visit, 258 patients with at least moderate baseline pain received TEC or control; just after the same visit, they reported on whether the physician recommended a new pain medicine or a change in dose of an existing medicine. Pain severity and pain-related impairment were measured two, six, and 12 weeks later. Results: Patients assigned to TEC were more likely than controls to report a change in the analgesic treatment regimen (60% vs. 36%, P < 0.01); significant effects persisted after adjustment for baseline pain, study site, and physician (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.55, 4.40, P < 0.01). In a mixed-effects repeated measures regression, analgesic change (but not TEC itself) was associated with a sustained decrease in pain severity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: TEC increases the likelihood of self-reported, physician-directed adjustments in analgesic prescribing, and treatment intensification is associated with better cancer pain outcomes.

AB - Context: For patients with cancer-related pain and their physicians, routine oncology visits are an opportunity to adjust the analgesic regimen and secure better pain control. However, treatment intensification occurs haphazardly in practice. Objectives: To estimate the effect of patient-centered tailored education and coaching (TEC) on the likelihood of analgesic treatment adjustment during oncology visits, and in turn, the influence of treatment adjustment on subsequent cancer pain control, we studied patients enrolled in a randomized trial of TEC. Methods: Just before a scheduled oncology visit, 258 patients with at least moderate baseline pain received TEC or control; just after the same visit, they reported on whether the physician recommended a new pain medicine or a change in dose of an existing medicine. Pain severity and pain-related impairment were measured two, six, and 12 weeks later. Results: Patients assigned to TEC were more likely than controls to report a change in the analgesic treatment regimen (60% vs. 36%, P < 0.01); significant effects persisted after adjustment for baseline pain, study site, and physician (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.55, 4.40, P < 0.01). In a mixed-effects repeated measures regression, analgesic change (but not TEC itself) was associated with a sustained decrease in pain severity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: TEC increases the likelihood of self-reported, physician-directed adjustments in analgesic prescribing, and treatment intensification is associated with better cancer pain outcomes.

KW - analgesia

KW - Cancer pain

KW - pain management

KW - palliative care

KW - patient education

KW - quality of care

KW - therapeutic inertia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860678926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860678926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 22560357

AN - SCOPUS:84860678926

VL - 43

SP - 874

EP - 884

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 5

ER -