Induction and category coherence

Mary Utter, Gregory L. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-99
Number of pages5
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Induction
Family Resemblance
Inductive Inference
Stimulus
Salient
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Induction and category coherence. / Utter, Mary; Murphy, Gregory L.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 95-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Utter, Mary ; Murphy, Gregory L. / Induction and category coherence. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1996 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 95-99.
@article{a899eefa4cb746be949ffca9b3afdc2a,
title = "Induction and category coherence",
abstract = "In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.",
author = "Mary Utter and Murphy, {Gregory L.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03210747",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "95--99",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Induction and category coherence

AU - Utter, Mary

AU - Murphy, Gregory L.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

AB - In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002764902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002764902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03210747

DO - 10.3758/BF03210747

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002764902

VL - 3

SP - 95

EP - 99

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -