Individualized patient education and coaching to improve pain control among cancer outpatients

J. W. Oliver, Richard L Kravitz, S. H. Kaplan, Frederick J Meyers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: An estimated 42% of cancer patients suffer from poorly controlled pain, in part because of patient-related barriers to pain control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related knowledge among outpatients with cancer-related pain. Patients and Methods: English-speaking cancer patients (18 to 75 years old) with moderate pain over the past 2 weeks were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 34) or control group (n = 33). Experimental patients received a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-management, to redress personal misconceptions about pain treatment, and to rehearse an individually scripted patient-physician dialog about pain control. The control group received standardized instruction on controlling pain. Data on average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, and pain-related knowledge were collected at enrollment and 2-week follow-up. Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. At follow-up, average pain severity improved significantly more among experimental group patients than among control patients (P = .014). The intervention had no statistically significant impact on functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. Conclusion: Compared with provision of standard educational materials and counseling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-related pain was associated with improvement in average pain levels. Larger studies are needed to validate these effects and elucidate their mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2206-2212
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume19
Issue number8
StatePublished - Apr 15 2001

Fingerprint

Patient Education
Outpatients
Pain
Neoplasms
Mentoring
Education
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Individualized patient education and coaching to improve pain control among cancer outpatients. / Oliver, J. W.; Kravitz, Richard L; Kaplan, S. H.; Meyers, Frederick J.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 8, 15.04.2001, p. 2206-2212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2abd0f8c2d5a4175a89ff4d713b48950,
title = "Individualized patient education and coaching to improve pain control among cancer outpatients",
abstract = "Purpose: An estimated 42{\%} of cancer patients suffer from poorly controlled pain, in part because of patient-related barriers to pain control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related knowledge among outpatients with cancer-related pain. Patients and Methods: English-speaking cancer patients (18 to 75 years old) with moderate pain over the past 2 weeks were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 34) or control group (n = 33). Experimental patients received a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-management, to redress personal misconceptions about pain treatment, and to rehearse an individually scripted patient-physician dialog about pain control. The control group received standardized instruction on controlling pain. Data on average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, and pain-related knowledge were collected at enrollment and 2-week follow-up. Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. At follow-up, average pain severity improved significantly more among experimental group patients than among control patients (P = .014). The intervention had no statistically significant impact on functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. Conclusion: Compared with provision of standard educational materials and counseling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-related pain was associated with improvement in average pain levels. Larger studies are needed to validate these effects and elucidate their mechanisms.",
author = "Oliver, {J. W.} and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Kaplan, {S. H.} and Meyers, {Frederick J}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "2206--2212",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individualized patient education and coaching to improve pain control among cancer outpatients

AU - Oliver, J. W.

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Kaplan, S. H.

AU - Meyers, Frederick J

PY - 2001/4/15

Y1 - 2001/4/15

N2 - Purpose: An estimated 42% of cancer patients suffer from poorly controlled pain, in part because of patient-related barriers to pain control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related knowledge among outpatients with cancer-related pain. Patients and Methods: English-speaking cancer patients (18 to 75 years old) with moderate pain over the past 2 weeks were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 34) or control group (n = 33). Experimental patients received a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-management, to redress personal misconceptions about pain treatment, and to rehearse an individually scripted patient-physician dialog about pain control. The control group received standardized instruction on controlling pain. Data on average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, and pain-related knowledge were collected at enrollment and 2-week follow-up. Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. At follow-up, average pain severity improved significantly more among experimental group patients than among control patients (P = .014). The intervention had no statistically significant impact on functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. Conclusion: Compared with provision of standard educational materials and counseling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-related pain was associated with improvement in average pain levels. Larger studies are needed to validate these effects and elucidate their mechanisms.

AB - Purpose: An estimated 42% of cancer patients suffer from poorly controlled pain, in part because of patient-related barriers to pain control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related knowledge among outpatients with cancer-related pain. Patients and Methods: English-speaking cancer patients (18 to 75 years old) with moderate pain over the past 2 weeks were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 34) or control group (n = 33). Experimental patients received a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-management, to redress personal misconceptions about pain treatment, and to rehearse an individually scripted patient-physician dialog about pain control. The control group received standardized instruction on controlling pain. Data on average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, and pain-related knowledge were collected at enrollment and 2-week follow-up. Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. At follow-up, average pain severity improved significantly more among experimental group patients than among control patients (P = .014). The intervention had no statistically significant impact on functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. Conclusion: Compared with provision of standard educational materials and counseling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-related pain was associated with improvement in average pain levels. Larger studies are needed to validate these effects and elucidate their mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035871488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035871488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11304773

AN - SCOPUS:0035871488

VL - 19

SP - 2206

EP - 2212

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 8

ER -