Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions

the first four months of life in humans

David H. Peterzell, John S Werner, Peter S. Kaplan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity functions of forty 4-month-old human infants were measured using a preferential-looking method and the method of constant stimuli. Circular sinewave gratings varied from 0.27 to 1.08 c/deg, contained eight unattenuated cycles (with edges tapered to uniform gray), and rose to the desired contrast in 2 sec. Log contrast sensitivities for variables close in spatial frequency correlated more highly than those that were farther apart in these data, and in data of 1-, 2-, and 3-month-olds from Banks and Salapatek [(1981) Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1-45]. Factor analyses yielded at least two frequency-tuned factors per age group. Monte Carlo simulations of a quantitative model that shifts spatial mechanisms to higher frequencies with age reproduced the results for 4-month-olds, but simulations of adultlike, unshifting mechanisms did not. The data are consistent with the following conclusions: 1. (a) individual differences in the sensitivity of spatial mechanisms may explain some individual differences in CSFs; 2. (b) factor analysis may help to estimate mechanism tuning; and 3. (c) spatial mechanisms may shift to higher frequencies during development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-396
Number of pages16
JournalVision Research
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Individuality
Statistical Factor Analysis
Experimental Psychology
Child Psychology
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Contrast sensitivity Factor analysis Individual differences Infant vision Spatial frequency Visual development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions : the first four months of life in humans. / Peterzell, David H.; Werner, John S; Kaplan, Peter S.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1993, p. 381-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71ff0316527545eabed541b501b89868,
title = "Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions: the first four months of life in humans",
abstract = "Contrast sensitivity functions of forty 4-month-old human infants were measured using a preferential-looking method and the method of constant stimuli. Circular sinewave gratings varied from 0.27 to 1.08 c/deg, contained eight unattenuated cycles (with edges tapered to uniform gray), and rose to the desired contrast in 2 sec. Log contrast sensitivities for variables close in spatial frequency correlated more highly than those that were farther apart in these data, and in data of 1-, 2-, and 3-month-olds from Banks and Salapatek [(1981) Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1-45]. Factor analyses yielded at least two frequency-tuned factors per age group. Monte Carlo simulations of a quantitative model that shifts spatial mechanisms to higher frequencies with age reproduced the results for 4-month-olds, but simulations of adultlike, unshifting mechanisms did not. The data are consistent with the following conclusions: 1. (a) individual differences in the sensitivity of spatial mechanisms may explain some individual differences in CSFs; 2. (b) factor analysis may help to estimate mechanism tuning; and 3. (c) spatial mechanisms may shift to higher frequencies during development.",
keywords = "Contrast sensitivity Factor analysis Individual differences Infant vision Spatial frequency Visual development",
author = "Peterzell, {David H.} and Werner, {John S} and Kaplan, {Peter S.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(93)90093-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "381--396",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions

T2 - the first four months of life in humans

AU - Peterzell, David H.

AU - Werner, John S

AU - Kaplan, Peter S.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Contrast sensitivity functions of forty 4-month-old human infants were measured using a preferential-looking method and the method of constant stimuli. Circular sinewave gratings varied from 0.27 to 1.08 c/deg, contained eight unattenuated cycles (with edges tapered to uniform gray), and rose to the desired contrast in 2 sec. Log contrast sensitivities for variables close in spatial frequency correlated more highly than those that were farther apart in these data, and in data of 1-, 2-, and 3-month-olds from Banks and Salapatek [(1981) Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1-45]. Factor analyses yielded at least two frequency-tuned factors per age group. Monte Carlo simulations of a quantitative model that shifts spatial mechanisms to higher frequencies with age reproduced the results for 4-month-olds, but simulations of adultlike, unshifting mechanisms did not. The data are consistent with the following conclusions: 1. (a) individual differences in the sensitivity of spatial mechanisms may explain some individual differences in CSFs; 2. (b) factor analysis may help to estimate mechanism tuning; and 3. (c) spatial mechanisms may shift to higher frequencies during development.

AB - Contrast sensitivity functions of forty 4-month-old human infants were measured using a preferential-looking method and the method of constant stimuli. Circular sinewave gratings varied from 0.27 to 1.08 c/deg, contained eight unattenuated cycles (with edges tapered to uniform gray), and rose to the desired contrast in 2 sec. Log contrast sensitivities for variables close in spatial frequency correlated more highly than those that were farther apart in these data, and in data of 1-, 2-, and 3-month-olds from Banks and Salapatek [(1981) Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1-45]. Factor analyses yielded at least two frequency-tuned factors per age group. Monte Carlo simulations of a quantitative model that shifts spatial mechanisms to higher frequencies with age reproduced the results for 4-month-olds, but simulations of adultlike, unshifting mechanisms did not. The data are consistent with the following conclusions: 1. (a) individual differences in the sensitivity of spatial mechanisms may explain some individual differences in CSFs; 2. (b) factor analysis may help to estimate mechanism tuning; and 3. (c) spatial mechanisms may shift to higher frequencies during development.

KW - Contrast sensitivity Factor analysis Individual differences Infant vision Spatial frequency Visual development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027477214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027477214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90093-C

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90093-C

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 381

EP - 396

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 3

ER -