Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools

A cross-sectional observational study

Jill Locke, Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Rinad S. Beidas, Gregory A. Aarons, Ming Xie, Aaron R. Lyon, Aubyn Stahmer, Max Seidman, Lindsay Frederick, Cristine Oh, Christine Spaulding, Shannon Dorsey, David S. Mandell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Children with autism receive most of their intervention services in public schools, but implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism varies. Studies suggest that individual (attitudes) and organizational characteristics (implementation leadership and climate) may influence providers' use of EBPs, but research is relatively limited in this area. This study examined individual and organizational factors associated with implementation of three EBPs - discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules - for children with autism in special education classrooms in public elementary schools. Methods: Participants included 67 autism support teachers and 85 other classroom staff from 52 public elementary schools in the northeastern United States. Participants reported their attitudes toward EBPs (e.g., intuitive appeal, willingness if required, openness, and divergence), implementation leadership and climate of their school, and the frequency with which they deliver each of three EBPs. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of attitudes about EBPs with organizational characteristics and intensity of EBP use. Demographic covariates with a bivariate association with EBP use significant at p <.20 were entered into the adjusted models. Results: There were significant findings for only one EBP, discrete trial training. Teachers who reported higher perceived divergence (perceived difference of usual practice with academically developed or research-based practices) between EBPs and current practices used less discrete trial training (f 2 =.18), and teachers who reported higher appeal (willingness to adopt EBPs given their intuitive appeal) of EBPs used more discrete trial training (f 2 =.22). No organizational factors were significantly associated with implementation with any of the three EBPs. Conclusions: Attitudes toward EBPs may affect teachers' decisions to use EBPs; however, implementation leadership and climate did not predict EBP use. Future implementation efforts ought to consider the type of EBP and its fit within the context in terms of the EBP's similarities to and differences from existing practices and programs in the setting. Implementation strategies that target individual attitudes about EBPs may be warranted in public schools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number29
JournalImplementation Science
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2019

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Autistic Disorder
Observational Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Climate
Special Education
New England

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Autism
  • Fidelity
  • Implementation
  • Organizational factors
  • Schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools : A cross-sectional observational study. / Locke, Jill; Lawson, Gwendolyn M.; Beidas, Rinad S.; Aarons, Gregory A.; Xie, Ming; Lyon, Aaron R.; Stahmer, Aubyn; Seidman, Max; Frederick, Lindsay; Oh, Cristine; Spaulding, Christine; Dorsey, Shannon; Mandell, David S.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, 29, 13.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Locke, J, Lawson, GM, Beidas, RS, Aarons, GA, Xie, M, Lyon, AR, Stahmer, A, Seidman, M, Frederick, L, Oh, C, Spaulding, C, Dorsey, S & Mandell, DS 2019, 'Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools: A cross-sectional observational study', Implementation Science, vol. 14, no. 1, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0877-3
Locke, Jill ; Lawson, Gwendolyn M. ; Beidas, Rinad S. ; Aarons, Gregory A. ; Xie, Ming ; Lyon, Aaron R. ; Stahmer, Aubyn ; Seidman, Max ; Frederick, Lindsay ; Oh, Cristine ; Spaulding, Christine ; Dorsey, Shannon ; Mandell, David S. / Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools : A cross-sectional observational study. In: Implementation Science. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{7ac6fa2d66e34b75b93ca748ba39037a,
title = "Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools: A cross-sectional observational study",
abstract = "Background: Children with autism receive most of their intervention services in public schools, but implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism varies. Studies suggest that individual (attitudes) and organizational characteristics (implementation leadership and climate) may influence providers' use of EBPs, but research is relatively limited in this area. This study examined individual and organizational factors associated with implementation of three EBPs - discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules - for children with autism in special education classrooms in public elementary schools. Methods: Participants included 67 autism support teachers and 85 other classroom staff from 52 public elementary schools in the northeastern United States. Participants reported their attitudes toward EBPs (e.g., intuitive appeal, willingness if required, openness, and divergence), implementation leadership and climate of their school, and the frequency with which they deliver each of three EBPs. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of attitudes about EBPs with organizational characteristics and intensity of EBP use. Demographic covariates with a bivariate association with EBP use significant at p <.20 were entered into the adjusted models. Results: There were significant findings for only one EBP, discrete trial training. Teachers who reported higher perceived divergence (perceived difference of usual practice with academically developed or research-based practices) between EBPs and current practices used less discrete trial training (f 2 =.18), and teachers who reported higher appeal (willingness to adopt EBPs given their intuitive appeal) of EBPs used more discrete trial training (f 2 =.22). No organizational factors were significantly associated with implementation with any of the three EBPs. Conclusions: Attitudes toward EBPs may affect teachers' decisions to use EBPs; however, implementation leadership and climate did not predict EBP use. Future implementation efforts ought to consider the type of EBP and its fit within the context in terms of the EBP's similarities to and differences from existing practices and programs in the setting. Implementation strategies that target individual attitudes about EBPs may be warranted in public schools.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Autism, Fidelity, Implementation, Organizational factors, Schools",
author = "Jill Locke and Lawson, {Gwendolyn M.} and Beidas, {Rinad S.} and Aarons, {Gregory A.} and Ming Xie and Lyon, {Aaron R.} and Aubyn Stahmer and Max Seidman and Lindsay Frederick and Cristine Oh and Christine Spaulding and Shannon Dorsey and Mandell, {David S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-019-0877-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools

T2 - A cross-sectional observational study

AU - Locke, Jill

AU - Lawson, Gwendolyn M.

AU - Beidas, Rinad S.

AU - Aarons, Gregory A.

AU - Xie, Ming

AU - Lyon, Aaron R.

AU - Stahmer, Aubyn

AU - Seidman, Max

AU - Frederick, Lindsay

AU - Oh, Cristine

AU - Spaulding, Christine

AU - Dorsey, Shannon

AU - Mandell, David S.

PY - 2019/3/13

Y1 - 2019/3/13

N2 - Background: Children with autism receive most of their intervention services in public schools, but implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism varies. Studies suggest that individual (attitudes) and organizational characteristics (implementation leadership and climate) may influence providers' use of EBPs, but research is relatively limited in this area. This study examined individual and organizational factors associated with implementation of three EBPs - discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules - for children with autism in special education classrooms in public elementary schools. Methods: Participants included 67 autism support teachers and 85 other classroom staff from 52 public elementary schools in the northeastern United States. Participants reported their attitudes toward EBPs (e.g., intuitive appeal, willingness if required, openness, and divergence), implementation leadership and climate of their school, and the frequency with which they deliver each of three EBPs. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of attitudes about EBPs with organizational characteristics and intensity of EBP use. Demographic covariates with a bivariate association with EBP use significant at p <.20 were entered into the adjusted models. Results: There were significant findings for only one EBP, discrete trial training. Teachers who reported higher perceived divergence (perceived difference of usual practice with academically developed or research-based practices) between EBPs and current practices used less discrete trial training (f 2 =.18), and teachers who reported higher appeal (willingness to adopt EBPs given their intuitive appeal) of EBPs used more discrete trial training (f 2 =.22). No organizational factors were significantly associated with implementation with any of the three EBPs. Conclusions: Attitudes toward EBPs may affect teachers' decisions to use EBPs; however, implementation leadership and climate did not predict EBP use. Future implementation efforts ought to consider the type of EBP and its fit within the context in terms of the EBP's similarities to and differences from existing practices and programs in the setting. Implementation strategies that target individual attitudes about EBPs may be warranted in public schools.

AB - Background: Children with autism receive most of their intervention services in public schools, but implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism varies. Studies suggest that individual (attitudes) and organizational characteristics (implementation leadership and climate) may influence providers' use of EBPs, but research is relatively limited in this area. This study examined individual and organizational factors associated with implementation of three EBPs - discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules - for children with autism in special education classrooms in public elementary schools. Methods: Participants included 67 autism support teachers and 85 other classroom staff from 52 public elementary schools in the northeastern United States. Participants reported their attitudes toward EBPs (e.g., intuitive appeal, willingness if required, openness, and divergence), implementation leadership and climate of their school, and the frequency with which they deliver each of three EBPs. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of attitudes about EBPs with organizational characteristics and intensity of EBP use. Demographic covariates with a bivariate association with EBP use significant at p <.20 were entered into the adjusted models. Results: There were significant findings for only one EBP, discrete trial training. Teachers who reported higher perceived divergence (perceived difference of usual practice with academically developed or research-based practices) between EBPs and current practices used less discrete trial training (f 2 =.18), and teachers who reported higher appeal (willingness to adopt EBPs given their intuitive appeal) of EBPs used more discrete trial training (f 2 =.22). No organizational factors were significantly associated with implementation with any of the three EBPs. Conclusions: Attitudes toward EBPs may affect teachers' decisions to use EBPs; however, implementation leadership and climate did not predict EBP use. Future implementation efforts ought to consider the type of EBP and its fit within the context in terms of the EBP's similarities to and differences from existing practices and programs in the setting. Implementation strategies that target individual attitudes about EBPs may be warranted in public schools.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Autism

KW - Fidelity

KW - Implementation

KW - Organizational factors

KW - Schools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062837527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062837527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-019-0877-3

DO - 10.1186/s13012-019-0877-3

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 29

ER -