Indications and contraindications for thoracic epidural analgesia in multiply injured patients

Eileen M. Bulger, William T. Edwards, Mario de Pinto, Patricia Klotz, Gregory Jurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives: Rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in pneumonia and duration of mechanical ventilation with epidural analgesia (EA) following multiple rib fractures. There remains controversy regarding the appropriate indications and contraindications for EA in multiply injured patients. We sought to determine the factors underlying the decision to use or not to use EA in these patients. Methods: A survey was sent to the directors of pain management services at all American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) designated Level I trauma centers in the U.S. The survey queried their opinion regarding the appropriateness of 33 contraindications and eight indications for EA after rib fractures. Results: The response rate was 43% (81/188). Ninety-five percent of responding centers indicated that EA is used after rib fractures, but only 15% had guidelines defining the indications and contraindications. There was general agreement (>80%) regarding the indications for EA but disagreement regarding the contraindications. Contraindications were categorised based on the degree of agreement of respondents. The areas of greatest controversy involved minor spine injuries and minor coagulopathy. Conclusions: There is wide variability regarding contraindications employed for thoracic epidural analgesia following rib fractures. These data support the need for evidenced based guidelines to define the use of EA in the multiply injured patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-22
Number of pages8
JournalAcute Pain
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidural Analgesia
Rib Fractures
Thorax
Guidelines
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Pain Management
Artificial Respiration
Pneumonia
Spine
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • Epidural analgesia
  • Pain control
  • Rib fractures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Indications and contraindications for thoracic epidural analgesia in multiply injured patients. / Bulger, Eileen M.; Edwards, William T.; de Pinto, Mario; Klotz, Patricia; Jurkovich, Gregory.

In: Acute Pain, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.03.2008, p. 15-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bulger, Eileen M. ; Edwards, William T. ; de Pinto, Mario ; Klotz, Patricia ; Jurkovich, Gregory. / Indications and contraindications for thoracic epidural analgesia in multiply injured patients. In: Acute Pain. 2008 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 15-22.
@article{1bf0042d3e4f432582c06176805ed1e6,
title = "Indications and contraindications for thoracic epidural analgesia in multiply injured patients",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in pneumonia and duration of mechanical ventilation with epidural analgesia (EA) following multiple rib fractures. There remains controversy regarding the appropriate indications and contraindications for EA in multiply injured patients. We sought to determine the factors underlying the decision to use or not to use EA in these patients. Methods: A survey was sent to the directors of pain management services at all American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) designated Level I trauma centers in the U.S. The survey queried their opinion regarding the appropriateness of 33 contraindications and eight indications for EA after rib fractures. Results: The response rate was 43{\%} (81/188). Ninety-five percent of responding centers indicated that EA is used after rib fractures, but only 15{\%} had guidelines defining the indications and contraindications. There was general agreement (>80{\%}) regarding the indications for EA but disagreement regarding the contraindications. Contraindications were categorised based on the degree of agreement of respondents. The areas of greatest controversy involved minor spine injuries and minor coagulopathy. Conclusions: There is wide variability regarding contraindications employed for thoracic epidural analgesia following rib fractures. These data support the need for evidenced based guidelines to define the use of EA in the multiply injured patient.",
keywords = "Epidural analgesia, Pain control, Rib fractures",
author = "Bulger, {Eileen M.} and Edwards, {William T.} and {de Pinto}, Mario and Patricia Klotz and Gregory Jurkovich",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acpain.2007.10.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "15--22",
journal = "Acute Pain",
issn = "1366-0071",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indications and contraindications for thoracic epidural analgesia in multiply injured patients

AU - Bulger, Eileen M.

AU - Edwards, William T.

AU - de Pinto, Mario

AU - Klotz, Patricia

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Background and objectives: Rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in pneumonia and duration of mechanical ventilation with epidural analgesia (EA) following multiple rib fractures. There remains controversy regarding the appropriate indications and contraindications for EA in multiply injured patients. We sought to determine the factors underlying the decision to use or not to use EA in these patients. Methods: A survey was sent to the directors of pain management services at all American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) designated Level I trauma centers in the U.S. The survey queried their opinion regarding the appropriateness of 33 contraindications and eight indications for EA after rib fractures. Results: The response rate was 43% (81/188). Ninety-five percent of responding centers indicated that EA is used after rib fractures, but only 15% had guidelines defining the indications and contraindications. There was general agreement (>80%) regarding the indications for EA but disagreement regarding the contraindications. Contraindications were categorised based on the degree of agreement of respondents. The areas of greatest controversy involved minor spine injuries and minor coagulopathy. Conclusions: There is wide variability regarding contraindications employed for thoracic epidural analgesia following rib fractures. These data support the need for evidenced based guidelines to define the use of EA in the multiply injured patient.

AB - Background and objectives: Rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in pneumonia and duration of mechanical ventilation with epidural analgesia (EA) following multiple rib fractures. There remains controversy regarding the appropriate indications and contraindications for EA in multiply injured patients. We sought to determine the factors underlying the decision to use or not to use EA in these patients. Methods: A survey was sent to the directors of pain management services at all American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) designated Level I trauma centers in the U.S. The survey queried their opinion regarding the appropriateness of 33 contraindications and eight indications for EA after rib fractures. Results: The response rate was 43% (81/188). Ninety-five percent of responding centers indicated that EA is used after rib fractures, but only 15% had guidelines defining the indications and contraindications. There was general agreement (>80%) regarding the indications for EA but disagreement regarding the contraindications. Contraindications were categorised based on the degree of agreement of respondents. The areas of greatest controversy involved minor spine injuries and minor coagulopathy. Conclusions: There is wide variability regarding contraindications employed for thoracic epidural analgesia following rib fractures. These data support the need for evidenced based guidelines to define the use of EA in the multiply injured patient.

KW - Epidural analgesia

KW - Pain control

KW - Rib fractures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41249103392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41249103392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acpain.2007.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.acpain.2007.10.019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:41249103392

VL - 10

SP - 15

EP - 22

JO - Acute Pain

JF - Acute Pain

SN - 1366-0071

IS - 1

ER -