Increasing Discussions of Intimate Partner Violence in Prenatal Care Using Video Doctor Plus Provider Cueing: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Janice Humphreys, Janice Y. Tsoh, Michael A. Kohn, Barbara Gerbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To report the effectiveness of a prenatal intervention and to provide evidence that prenatal visits provide an opportune time for health assessment and counseling with abused women. Methods: Fifty ethnically diverse pregnant women who presented for routine prenatal care and who also reported being at risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) were recruited to the study. Participants were assigned to either usual care or the Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention. At baseline and 1 month later at another routine prenatal visit, intervention group participants received a 15-minute Video Doctor assessment and interactive tailored counseling. Their providers received a printed Cue Sheet alert and suggested counseling statements. Main Findings: Participants in the intervention group were significantly more likely to report provider-patient discussions of IPV compared with participants receiving usual care at baseline (81.8% vs. 16.7%; p < .001) and at the 1-month follow-up (70.0% vs. 23.5%; p = .005). Summing the number of patient-provider discussions across the two visits at baseline and 1 month later, intervention participants were significantly more likely to have IPV risk discussion with their providers at one or both visits (90.0% vs. 23.6%; p < .001) compared with the participants who received usual care. When specifically asked about the helpfulness of these IPV-related discussions, 20 out of 22 (90.9%) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at baseline and all 18 (100%) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention significantly increases the likelihood of provider-patient IPV discussion with pregnant women with a history of abuse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-144
Number of pages9
JournalWomen's Health Issues
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Prenatal Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
video
violence
Counseling
Pregnant Women
counseling
Battered Women
Cues
Intimate Partner Violence
Health
abuse
Group
health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Maternity and Midwifery
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Increasing Discussions of Intimate Partner Violence in Prenatal Care Using Video Doctor Plus Provider Cueing : A Randomized, Controlled Trial. / Humphreys, Janice; Tsoh, Janice Y.; Kohn, Michael A.; Gerbert, Barbara.

In: Women's Health Issues, Vol. 21, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 136-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Humphreys, Janice ; Tsoh, Janice Y. ; Kohn, Michael A. ; Gerbert, Barbara. / Increasing Discussions of Intimate Partner Violence in Prenatal Care Using Video Doctor Plus Provider Cueing : A Randomized, Controlled Trial. In: Women's Health Issues. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 136-144.
@article{d5b3c5b4577b43a4a832135ab898a1bb,
title = "Increasing Discussions of Intimate Partner Violence in Prenatal Care Using Video Doctor Plus Provider Cueing: A Randomized, Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Purpose: To report the effectiveness of a prenatal intervention and to provide evidence that prenatal visits provide an opportune time for health assessment and counseling with abused women. Methods: Fifty ethnically diverse pregnant women who presented for routine prenatal care and who also reported being at risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) were recruited to the study. Participants were assigned to either usual care or the Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention. At baseline and 1 month later at another routine prenatal visit, intervention group participants received a 15-minute Video Doctor assessment and interactive tailored counseling. Their providers received a printed Cue Sheet alert and suggested counseling statements. Main Findings: Participants in the intervention group were significantly more likely to report provider-patient discussions of IPV compared with participants receiving usual care at baseline (81.8{\%} vs. 16.7{\%}; p < .001) and at the 1-month follow-up (70.0{\%} vs. 23.5{\%}; p = .005). Summing the number of patient-provider discussions across the two visits at baseline and 1 month later, intervention participants were significantly more likely to have IPV risk discussion with their providers at one or both visits (90.0{\%} vs. 23.6{\%}; p < .001) compared with the participants who received usual care. When specifically asked about the helpfulness of these IPV-related discussions, 20 out of 22 (90.9{\%}) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at baseline and all 18 (100{\%}) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention significantly increases the likelihood of provider-patient IPV discussion with pregnant women with a history of abuse.",
author = "Janice Humphreys and Tsoh, {Janice Y.} and Kohn, {Michael A.} and Barbara Gerbert",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.whi.2010.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "136--144",
journal = "Women's Health Issues",
issn = "1049-3867",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing Discussions of Intimate Partner Violence in Prenatal Care Using Video Doctor Plus Provider Cueing

T2 - A Randomized, Controlled Trial

AU - Humphreys, Janice

AU - Tsoh, Janice Y.

AU - Kohn, Michael A.

AU - Gerbert, Barbara

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Purpose: To report the effectiveness of a prenatal intervention and to provide evidence that prenatal visits provide an opportune time for health assessment and counseling with abused women. Methods: Fifty ethnically diverse pregnant women who presented for routine prenatal care and who also reported being at risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) were recruited to the study. Participants were assigned to either usual care or the Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention. At baseline and 1 month later at another routine prenatal visit, intervention group participants received a 15-minute Video Doctor assessment and interactive tailored counseling. Their providers received a printed Cue Sheet alert and suggested counseling statements. Main Findings: Participants in the intervention group were significantly more likely to report provider-patient discussions of IPV compared with participants receiving usual care at baseline (81.8% vs. 16.7%; p < .001) and at the 1-month follow-up (70.0% vs. 23.5%; p = .005). Summing the number of patient-provider discussions across the two visits at baseline and 1 month later, intervention participants were significantly more likely to have IPV risk discussion with their providers at one or both visits (90.0% vs. 23.6%; p < .001) compared with the participants who received usual care. When specifically asked about the helpfulness of these IPV-related discussions, 20 out of 22 (90.9%) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at baseline and all 18 (100%) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention significantly increases the likelihood of provider-patient IPV discussion with pregnant women with a history of abuse.

AB - Purpose: To report the effectiveness of a prenatal intervention and to provide evidence that prenatal visits provide an opportune time for health assessment and counseling with abused women. Methods: Fifty ethnically diverse pregnant women who presented for routine prenatal care and who also reported being at risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) were recruited to the study. Participants were assigned to either usual care or the Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention. At baseline and 1 month later at another routine prenatal visit, intervention group participants received a 15-minute Video Doctor assessment and interactive tailored counseling. Their providers received a printed Cue Sheet alert and suggested counseling statements. Main Findings: Participants in the intervention group were significantly more likely to report provider-patient discussions of IPV compared with participants receiving usual care at baseline (81.8% vs. 16.7%; p < .001) and at the 1-month follow-up (70.0% vs. 23.5%; p = .005). Summing the number of patient-provider discussions across the two visits at baseline and 1 month later, intervention participants were significantly more likely to have IPV risk discussion with their providers at one or both visits (90.0% vs. 23.6%; p < .001) compared with the participants who received usual care. When specifically asked about the helpfulness of these IPV-related discussions, 20 out of 22 (90.9%) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at baseline and all 18 (100%) participants rated the discussion as helpful or very helpful at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: Video Doctor plus Provider Cueing intervention significantly increases the likelihood of provider-patient IPV discussion with pregnant women with a history of abuse.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952008124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952008124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.whi.2010.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.whi.2010.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 21185737

AN - SCOPUS:79952008124

VL - 21

SP - 136

EP - 144

JO - Women's Health Issues

JF - Women's Health Issues

SN - 1049-3867

IS - 2

ER -