Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism

Addison L. McMurtry, John T Owings, John T Anderson, Felix D. Battistella, Robert Gosselin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have reported that placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) early after injury may decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of all trauma patients with placement of VCFs admitted to a single level-1 trauma center between 1989 and 1997. Two cohorts corresponding to years of high or low prophylactic VCF use (PVCF) were compared. Results: Records were reviewed for 299 trauma patients identified as having had placement of a VCE. Two hundred forty-eight filters were placed before the diagnosis of PE. During years of low PVCF use, the overall PE incidence was 0.31%; during years of high PVCF use, the incidence of PE was higher at 0.48% (p = 0.045, chi-square). Conclusions: Increased use of PVCFs failed to decrease the overall rate of PE in our trauma patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-320
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume189
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1999

Fingerprint

Vena Cava Filters
Pulmonary Embolism
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Trauma Centers
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism. / McMurtry, Addison L.; Owings, John T; Anderson, John T; Battistella, Felix D.; Gosselin, Robert.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 189, No. 3, 09.1999, p. 314-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2dd644c4c39c426f9902b4a70e0eaa4b,
title = "Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism",
abstract = "Background: Recent studies have reported that placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) early after injury may decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of all trauma patients with placement of VCFs admitted to a single level-1 trauma center between 1989 and 1997. Two cohorts corresponding to years of high or low prophylactic VCF use (PVCF) were compared. Results: Records were reviewed for 299 trauma patients identified as having had placement of a VCE. Two hundred forty-eight filters were placed before the diagnosis of PE. During years of low PVCF use, the overall PE incidence was 0.31{\%}; during years of high PVCF use, the incidence of PE was higher at 0.48{\%} (p = 0.045, chi-square). Conclusions: Increased use of PVCFs failed to decrease the overall rate of PE in our trauma patient population.",
author = "McMurtry, {Addison L.} and Owings, {John T} and Anderson, {John T} and Battistella, {Felix D.} and Robert Gosselin",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00137-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "189",
pages = "314--320",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism

AU - McMurtry, Addison L.

AU - Owings, John T

AU - Anderson, John T

AU - Battistella, Felix D.

AU - Gosselin, Robert

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - Background: Recent studies have reported that placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) early after injury may decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of all trauma patients with placement of VCFs admitted to a single level-1 trauma center between 1989 and 1997. Two cohorts corresponding to years of high or low prophylactic VCF use (PVCF) were compared. Results: Records were reviewed for 299 trauma patients identified as having had placement of a VCE. Two hundred forty-eight filters were placed before the diagnosis of PE. During years of low PVCF use, the overall PE incidence was 0.31%; during years of high PVCF use, the incidence of PE was higher at 0.48% (p = 0.045, chi-square). Conclusions: Increased use of PVCFs failed to decrease the overall rate of PE in our trauma patient population.

AB - Background: Recent studies have reported that placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) early after injury may decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of all trauma patients with placement of VCFs admitted to a single level-1 trauma center between 1989 and 1997. Two cohorts corresponding to years of high or low prophylactic VCF use (PVCF) were compared. Results: Records were reviewed for 299 trauma patients identified as having had placement of a VCE. Two hundred forty-eight filters were placed before the diagnosis of PE. During years of low PVCF use, the overall PE incidence was 0.31%; during years of high PVCF use, the incidence of PE was higher at 0.48% (p = 0.045, chi-square). Conclusions: Increased use of PVCFs failed to decrease the overall rate of PE in our trauma patient population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032842644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032842644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00137-4

DO - 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00137-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 10472933

AN - SCOPUS:0032842644

VL - 189

SP - 314

EP - 320

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 3

ER -