Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism

Addison L. McMurtry, John T Owings, John T Anderson, Felix D. Battistella, Robert Gosselin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have reported that placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) early after injury may decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of all trauma patients with placement of VCFs admitted to a single level-1 trauma center between 1989 and 1997. Two cohorts corresponding to years of high or low prophylactic VCF use (PVCF) were compared. Results: Records were reviewed for 299 trauma patients identified as having had placement of a VCE. Two hundred forty-eight filters were placed before the diagnosis of PE. During years of low PVCF use, the overall PE incidence was 0.31%; during years of high PVCF use, the incidence of PE was higher at 0.48% (p = 0.045, chi-square). Conclusions: Increased use of PVCFs failed to decrease the overall rate of PE in our trauma patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-320
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume189
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this