Incontinent ileovesicostomy: Long-term outcomes and complications

Nicholas J. Hellenthal, Scott S. Short, R. Corey O'Connor, Jonathan A. Eandi, Stanley Yap, Anthony R Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Incontinent ileovesicostomy was popularized in the mid-1990s as a surgical option for patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction who lack the dexterity to perform clean catheterization. There are several case series in the literature, but few studies look at the long-term outcomes and complications associated with this procedure. Methods: We review the outcomes of 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy for management of neurogenic voiding dysfunction since its introduction at our institution in 1998. We discuss, specifically, the preoperative and postoperative problems encountered as well as complications pertaining to ileovesicostomy itself. Results: At an average of 5 1/2 years follow-up, all 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy have experienced some form of urinary tract problem either associated with the ileovesicostomy or with their underlying neurogenic voiding dysfunction. After ileovesicostomy, seven of 12 patients (58%) have been able to reduce antibiotic usage and/ or hospital admission related to chronic upper tract infection. Two patients (17%) have subsequently been converted to ileal conduit. Conclusions: Incontinent ileovesicostomy is a useful option for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction who are unable to perform clean intermittent catheterization. It should be reserved for those patients who have exhausted less invasive therapy and in whom quality of life benefits cannot be achieved without diversion. Experience shows that there are no absolute indications for this procedure. The clinician and the patient must be aware of the importance of continued surveillance after this procedure for problems related to neurogenic voiding dysfunction and/or the ileovesicostomy itself.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-486
Number of pages4
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Urinary Tract
Intermittent Urethral Catheterization
Urinary Diversion
Catheterization
Quality of Life
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Infection
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Incontinent ileovesicostomy
  • Management
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Urology

Cite this

Incontinent ileovesicostomy : Long-term outcomes and complications. / Hellenthal, Nicholas J.; Short, Scott S.; O'Connor, R. Corey; Eandi, Jonathan A.; Yap, Stanley; Stone, Anthony R.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2009, p. 483-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hellenthal, Nicholas J. ; Short, Scott S. ; O'Connor, R. Corey ; Eandi, Jonathan A. ; Yap, Stanley ; Stone, Anthony R. / Incontinent ileovesicostomy : Long-term outcomes and complications. In: Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2009 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 483-486.
@article{4c30499cb5714d258fded7b059046367,
title = "Incontinent ileovesicostomy: Long-term outcomes and complications",
abstract = "Aims: Incontinent ileovesicostomy was popularized in the mid-1990s as a surgical option for patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction who lack the dexterity to perform clean catheterization. There are several case series in the literature, but few studies look at the long-term outcomes and complications associated with this procedure. Methods: We review the outcomes of 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy for management of neurogenic voiding dysfunction since its introduction at our institution in 1998. We discuss, specifically, the preoperative and postoperative problems encountered as well as complications pertaining to ileovesicostomy itself. Results: At an average of 5 1/2 years follow-up, all 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy have experienced some form of urinary tract problem either associated with the ileovesicostomy or with their underlying neurogenic voiding dysfunction. After ileovesicostomy, seven of 12 patients (58{\%}) have been able to reduce antibiotic usage and/ or hospital admission related to chronic upper tract infection. Two patients (17{\%}) have subsequently been converted to ileal conduit. Conclusions: Incontinent ileovesicostomy is a useful option for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction who are unable to perform clean intermittent catheterization. It should be reserved for those patients who have exhausted less invasive therapy and in whom quality of life benefits cannot be achieved without diversion. Experience shows that there are no absolute indications for this procedure. The clinician and the patient must be aware of the importance of continued surveillance after this procedure for problems related to neurogenic voiding dysfunction and/or the ileovesicostomy itself.",
keywords = "Complications, Incontinent ileovesicostomy, Management, Neurogenic bladder, Outcomes",
author = "Hellenthal, {Nicholas J.} and Short, {Scott S.} and O'Connor, {R. Corey} and Eandi, {Jonathan A.} and Stanley Yap and Stone, {Anthony R}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1002/nau.20695",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "483--486",
journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",
issn = "0733-2467",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incontinent ileovesicostomy

T2 - Long-term outcomes and complications

AU - Hellenthal, Nicholas J.

AU - Short, Scott S.

AU - O'Connor, R. Corey

AU - Eandi, Jonathan A.

AU - Yap, Stanley

AU - Stone, Anthony R

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Aims: Incontinent ileovesicostomy was popularized in the mid-1990s as a surgical option for patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction who lack the dexterity to perform clean catheterization. There are several case series in the literature, but few studies look at the long-term outcomes and complications associated with this procedure. Methods: We review the outcomes of 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy for management of neurogenic voiding dysfunction since its introduction at our institution in 1998. We discuss, specifically, the preoperative and postoperative problems encountered as well as complications pertaining to ileovesicostomy itself. Results: At an average of 5 1/2 years follow-up, all 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy have experienced some form of urinary tract problem either associated with the ileovesicostomy or with their underlying neurogenic voiding dysfunction. After ileovesicostomy, seven of 12 patients (58%) have been able to reduce antibiotic usage and/ or hospital admission related to chronic upper tract infection. Two patients (17%) have subsequently been converted to ileal conduit. Conclusions: Incontinent ileovesicostomy is a useful option for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction who are unable to perform clean intermittent catheterization. It should be reserved for those patients who have exhausted less invasive therapy and in whom quality of life benefits cannot be achieved without diversion. Experience shows that there are no absolute indications for this procedure. The clinician and the patient must be aware of the importance of continued surveillance after this procedure for problems related to neurogenic voiding dysfunction and/or the ileovesicostomy itself.

AB - Aims: Incontinent ileovesicostomy was popularized in the mid-1990s as a surgical option for patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction who lack the dexterity to perform clean catheterization. There are several case series in the literature, but few studies look at the long-term outcomes and complications associated with this procedure. Methods: We review the outcomes of 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy for management of neurogenic voiding dysfunction since its introduction at our institution in 1998. We discuss, specifically, the preoperative and postoperative problems encountered as well as complications pertaining to ileovesicostomy itself. Results: At an average of 5 1/2 years follow-up, all 12 patients who underwent incontinent ileovesicostomy have experienced some form of urinary tract problem either associated with the ileovesicostomy or with their underlying neurogenic voiding dysfunction. After ileovesicostomy, seven of 12 patients (58%) have been able to reduce antibiotic usage and/ or hospital admission related to chronic upper tract infection. Two patients (17%) have subsequently been converted to ileal conduit. Conclusions: Incontinent ileovesicostomy is a useful option for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction who are unable to perform clean intermittent catheterization. It should be reserved for those patients who have exhausted less invasive therapy and in whom quality of life benefits cannot be achieved without diversion. Experience shows that there are no absolute indications for this procedure. The clinician and the patient must be aware of the importance of continued surveillance after this procedure for problems related to neurogenic voiding dysfunction and/or the ileovesicostomy itself.

KW - Complications

KW - Incontinent ileovesicostomy

KW - Management

KW - Neurogenic bladder

KW - Outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70049116613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70049116613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nau.20695

DO - 10.1002/nau.20695

M3 - Article

C2 - 19274757

AN - SCOPUS:70049116613

VL - 28

SP - 483

EP - 486

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 6

ER -