Income inequality and physical and mental health

Testing associations consistent with proposed causal pathways

Frederick J. Zimmerman, Janice F Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To test associations between individual health outcomes and ecological variables proposed in causal models of relations between income inequality and health. Design: Regression analysis of a large, nationally representative dataset, linked to US census and other county and state level sources of data on ecological covariates. The regressions control for individual economic and demographic covariates as well as relevant potential ecological confounders. Setting: The US population in the year 2000. Participants: 4817 US adults about age 40, representative of the US population. Main outcome measures: Two outcomes were studied: self reported general health status, dichotomised as "fair" or "poor" compared with "excellent", "very good", or "good ", and depression as measured by a score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression instrument > 16. Results: State generosity was significantly associated with a reduced odds of reporting poor general health (OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.99), and the county unemployment rate with reduced odds of reporting depression (OR 0.91, 95%CI: 0.84 to 0.97). The measure of income inequality is a significant risk factor for reporting poor general health (OR 1.98, CI: 1.08 to 3.62), controlling for all ecological and individual covariates. In stratified models, the index of social capital is associated with reduced odds of reporting poor general health among black people and Hispanics (OR 0.40, CI: 0.18 to 0.90), but not significant among white people. The inequality measure is significantly associated with reporting poor general health among white people (OR 2.60, CI: 1.22 to 5.56) but not black people and Hispanics. Conclusions: The effect of income inequality on health may work through the influence of invidious social comparisons (particularly among white subjects) and (among black subjects and Latinos) through a reduction in social capital. Researchers may find it fruitful to recognise the cultural specificity of any such effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)513-521
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume60
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mental Health Associations
Health
Hispanic Americans
Unemployment
Information Storage and Retrieval
Censuses
Population
Health Status
Epidemiologic Studies
Regression Analysis
Economics
Research Personnel
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Income inequality and physical and mental health : Testing associations consistent with proposed causal pathways. / Zimmerman, Frederick J.; Bell, Janice F.

In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 60, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 513-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab1c065e8cc040889cb4d77e39fc5e27,
title = "Income inequality and physical and mental health: Testing associations consistent with proposed causal pathways",
abstract = "Objectives: To test associations between individual health outcomes and ecological variables proposed in causal models of relations between income inequality and health. Design: Regression analysis of a large, nationally representative dataset, linked to US census and other county and state level sources of data on ecological covariates. The regressions control for individual economic and demographic covariates as well as relevant potential ecological confounders. Setting: The US population in the year 2000. Participants: 4817 US adults about age 40, representative of the US population. Main outcome measures: Two outcomes were studied: self reported general health status, dichotomised as {"}fair{"} or {"}poor{"} compared with {"}excellent{"}, {"}very good{"}, or {"}good {"}, and depression as measured by a score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression instrument > 16. Results: State generosity was significantly associated with a reduced odds of reporting poor general health (OR 0.84, 95{\%}CI: 0.71 to 0.99), and the county unemployment rate with reduced odds of reporting depression (OR 0.91, 95{\%}CI: 0.84 to 0.97). The measure of income inequality is a significant risk factor for reporting poor general health (OR 1.98, CI: 1.08 to 3.62), controlling for all ecological and individual covariates. In stratified models, the index of social capital is associated with reduced odds of reporting poor general health among black people and Hispanics (OR 0.40, CI: 0.18 to 0.90), but not significant among white people. The inequality measure is significantly associated with reporting poor general health among white people (OR 2.60, CI: 1.22 to 5.56) but not black people and Hispanics. Conclusions: The effect of income inequality on health may work through the influence of invidious social comparisons (particularly among white subjects) and (among black subjects and Latinos) through a reduction in social capital. Researchers may find it fruitful to recognise the cultural specificity of any such effects.",
author = "Zimmerman, {Frederick J.} and Bell, {Janice F}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1136/jech.2005.040154",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "513--521",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health",
issn = "0143-005X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Income inequality and physical and mental health

T2 - Testing associations consistent with proposed causal pathways

AU - Zimmerman, Frederick J.

AU - Bell, Janice F

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Objectives: To test associations between individual health outcomes and ecological variables proposed in causal models of relations between income inequality and health. Design: Regression analysis of a large, nationally representative dataset, linked to US census and other county and state level sources of data on ecological covariates. The regressions control for individual economic and demographic covariates as well as relevant potential ecological confounders. Setting: The US population in the year 2000. Participants: 4817 US adults about age 40, representative of the US population. Main outcome measures: Two outcomes were studied: self reported general health status, dichotomised as "fair" or "poor" compared with "excellent", "very good", or "good ", and depression as measured by a score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression instrument > 16. Results: State generosity was significantly associated with a reduced odds of reporting poor general health (OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.99), and the county unemployment rate with reduced odds of reporting depression (OR 0.91, 95%CI: 0.84 to 0.97). The measure of income inequality is a significant risk factor for reporting poor general health (OR 1.98, CI: 1.08 to 3.62), controlling for all ecological and individual covariates. In stratified models, the index of social capital is associated with reduced odds of reporting poor general health among black people and Hispanics (OR 0.40, CI: 0.18 to 0.90), but not significant among white people. The inequality measure is significantly associated with reporting poor general health among white people (OR 2.60, CI: 1.22 to 5.56) but not black people and Hispanics. Conclusions: The effect of income inequality on health may work through the influence of invidious social comparisons (particularly among white subjects) and (among black subjects and Latinos) through a reduction in social capital. Researchers may find it fruitful to recognise the cultural specificity of any such effects.

AB - Objectives: To test associations between individual health outcomes and ecological variables proposed in causal models of relations between income inequality and health. Design: Regression analysis of a large, nationally representative dataset, linked to US census and other county and state level sources of data on ecological covariates. The regressions control for individual economic and demographic covariates as well as relevant potential ecological confounders. Setting: The US population in the year 2000. Participants: 4817 US adults about age 40, representative of the US population. Main outcome measures: Two outcomes were studied: self reported general health status, dichotomised as "fair" or "poor" compared with "excellent", "very good", or "good ", and depression as measured by a score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression instrument > 16. Results: State generosity was significantly associated with a reduced odds of reporting poor general health (OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.99), and the county unemployment rate with reduced odds of reporting depression (OR 0.91, 95%CI: 0.84 to 0.97). The measure of income inequality is a significant risk factor for reporting poor general health (OR 1.98, CI: 1.08 to 3.62), controlling for all ecological and individual covariates. In stratified models, the index of social capital is associated with reduced odds of reporting poor general health among black people and Hispanics (OR 0.40, CI: 0.18 to 0.90), but not significant among white people. The inequality measure is significantly associated with reporting poor general health among white people (OR 2.60, CI: 1.22 to 5.56) but not black people and Hispanics. Conclusions: The effect of income inequality on health may work through the influence of invidious social comparisons (particularly among white subjects) and (among black subjects and Latinos) through a reduction in social capital. Researchers may find it fruitful to recognise the cultural specificity of any such effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744479734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744479734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jech.2005.040154

DO - 10.1136/jech.2005.040154

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 513

EP - 521

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 6

ER -