Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families

Dawn M. Grabrick, V. Elving Anderson, Richard A. King, Lawrence H. Kushi, Thomas A. Sellers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although many segregation analyses of breast cancer have been published, few have included risk factor covariates. Maximum likelihood segregation analyses examining age-at-onset (model 1) and susceptibility (model 2) models of breast cancer were performed on 426 four-generation families originally ascertained between 1944 and 1952 through a breast cancer proband. Cancer status and risk factor data were collected through interviews of participants or surrogates. When segregation analyses were performed on 10,791 women, without estimation of any covariates, all hypotheses under both models were rejected. Model 1, which required estimation of fewer parameters than model 2, provided a better fit to the data according to Akaike's Information Criterion. Further segregation analyses were performed under model 1 on a subset of women with complete data on education, age at first birth (nulliparous women included), and alcohol use, covariates that were found to significantly (P < 0.05) improve the fit over the addition of exam age alone in logistic regression models. All three covariates improved the fit of the models, as did year of birth, but at all stages of model building, all of the hypotheses were still rejected. After the allele frequency was fixed at 0.0033, a subset of families appeared to fit a dominant model. Using this model, risk estimates were calculated based on inferred genotype, age, and covariate values. The penetrance was estimated to be 0.15, much lower than previous estimates based on families ascertained through breast cancer probands with early onset. Moreover, the estimates of penetrance were not greatly influenced by incorporation of the measured risk factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-164
Number of pages15
JournalGenetic Epidemiology
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Penetrance
Population
Logistic Models
Birth Order
Age of Onset
Gene Frequency
Genotype
Alcohols
Parturition
Interviews
Education
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Genetics
  • Models
  • Penetrance
  • Susceptibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families. / Grabrick, Dawn M.; Anderson, V. Elving; King, Richard A.; Kushi, Lawrence H.; Sellers, Thomas A.

In: Genetic Epidemiology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1999, p. 150-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grabrick, Dawn M. ; Anderson, V. Elving ; King, Richard A. ; Kushi, Lawrence H. ; Sellers, Thomas A. / Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families. In: Genetic Epidemiology. 1999 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 150-164.
@article{41249d0a5399470e8911d888dcd80410,
title = "Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families",
abstract = "Although many segregation analyses of breast cancer have been published, few have included risk factor covariates. Maximum likelihood segregation analyses examining age-at-onset (model 1) and susceptibility (model 2) models of breast cancer were performed on 426 four-generation families originally ascertained between 1944 and 1952 through a breast cancer proband. Cancer status and risk factor data were collected through interviews of participants or surrogates. When segregation analyses were performed on 10,791 women, without estimation of any covariates, all hypotheses under both models were rejected. Model 1, which required estimation of fewer parameters than model 2, provided a better fit to the data according to Akaike's Information Criterion. Further segregation analyses were performed under model 1 on a subset of women with complete data on education, age at first birth (nulliparous women included), and alcohol use, covariates that were found to significantly (P < 0.05) improve the fit over the addition of exam age alone in logistic regression models. All three covariates improved the fit of the models, as did year of birth, but at all stages of model building, all of the hypotheses were still rejected. After the allele frequency was fixed at 0.0033, a subset of families appeared to fit a dominant model. Using this model, risk estimates were calculated based on inferred genotype, age, and covariate values. The penetrance was estimated to be 0.15, much lower than previous estimates based on families ascertained through breast cancer probands with early onset. Moreover, the estimates of penetrance were not greatly influenced by incorporation of the measured risk factors.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Genetics, Models, Penetrance, Susceptibility",
author = "Grabrick, {Dawn M.} and Anderson, {V. Elving} and King, {Richard A.} and Kushi, {Lawrence H.} and Sellers, {Thomas A.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:2<150::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-S",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "150--164",
journal = "Genetic Epidemiology",
issn = "0741-0395",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families

AU - Grabrick, Dawn M.

AU - Anderson, V. Elving

AU - King, Richard A.

AU - Kushi, Lawrence H.

AU - Sellers, Thomas A.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Although many segregation analyses of breast cancer have been published, few have included risk factor covariates. Maximum likelihood segregation analyses examining age-at-onset (model 1) and susceptibility (model 2) models of breast cancer were performed on 426 four-generation families originally ascertained between 1944 and 1952 through a breast cancer proband. Cancer status and risk factor data were collected through interviews of participants or surrogates. When segregation analyses were performed on 10,791 women, without estimation of any covariates, all hypotheses under both models were rejected. Model 1, which required estimation of fewer parameters than model 2, provided a better fit to the data according to Akaike's Information Criterion. Further segregation analyses were performed under model 1 on a subset of women with complete data on education, age at first birth (nulliparous women included), and alcohol use, covariates that were found to significantly (P < 0.05) improve the fit over the addition of exam age alone in logistic regression models. All three covariates improved the fit of the models, as did year of birth, but at all stages of model building, all of the hypotheses were still rejected. After the allele frequency was fixed at 0.0033, a subset of families appeared to fit a dominant model. Using this model, risk estimates were calculated based on inferred genotype, age, and covariate values. The penetrance was estimated to be 0.15, much lower than previous estimates based on families ascertained through breast cancer probands with early onset. Moreover, the estimates of penetrance were not greatly influenced by incorporation of the measured risk factors.

AB - Although many segregation analyses of breast cancer have been published, few have included risk factor covariates. Maximum likelihood segregation analyses examining age-at-onset (model 1) and susceptibility (model 2) models of breast cancer were performed on 426 four-generation families originally ascertained between 1944 and 1952 through a breast cancer proband. Cancer status and risk factor data were collected through interviews of participants or surrogates. When segregation analyses were performed on 10,791 women, without estimation of any covariates, all hypotheses under both models were rejected. Model 1, which required estimation of fewer parameters than model 2, provided a better fit to the data according to Akaike's Information Criterion. Further segregation analyses were performed under model 1 on a subset of women with complete data on education, age at first birth (nulliparous women included), and alcohol use, covariates that were found to significantly (P < 0.05) improve the fit over the addition of exam age alone in logistic regression models. All three covariates improved the fit of the models, as did year of birth, but at all stages of model building, all of the hypotheses were still rejected. After the allele frequency was fixed at 0.0033, a subset of families appeared to fit a dominant model. Using this model, risk estimates were calculated based on inferred genotype, age, and covariate values. The penetrance was estimated to be 0.15, much lower than previous estimates based on families ascertained through breast cancer probands with early onset. Moreover, the estimates of penetrance were not greatly influenced by incorporation of the measured risk factors.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Genetics

KW - Models

KW - Penetrance

KW - Susceptibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032931512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032931512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:2<150::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-S

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:2<150::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-S

M3 - Article

C2 - 10030398

AN - SCOPUS:0032931512

VL - 16

SP - 150

EP - 164

JO - Genetic Epidemiology

JF - Genetic Epidemiology

SN - 0741-0395

IS - 2

ER -