Incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules in patients without cancer: Is further workup necessary?

Michael T Corwin, James S. Chalfant, Thomas W Loehfelm, Ghaneh Fananapazir, Ramit Lamba, William W. Mayo-Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of malignancy in incidentally detected bilateral adrenal masses in patients with no known history of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective search of CT reports of patients with incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules was performed from January 1, 2002, to January 1, 2014. Patients were excluded if they had a known cancer or suspected functioning adrenal tumor; 161 patients were included. Nodules were characterized as benign or malignant on the basis of imaging features at the index CT examination, imaging features at subsequent adrenal protocol CT or MRI, imaging stability for a minimum of 1 year, or clinical follow-up of a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS. Mean nodule size was 1.8 cm (range, 0.7-4.9 cm). There were no cases of primary or secondary adrenal malignancy (95% CI, 0.00-0.023). The nodules diagnosed on index CT scans were 73 adrenal adenomas and two myelolipomas. Seventy-four nodules were subsequently characterized as adrenal adenomas on the basis of imaging fndings. Of the 113 indeterminate nodules that had imaging follow-up, 111 were stable at the latest follow-up examination. One nodule grew 26% over 8.1 years, and the other grew 59% over 12.4 years. Clinical followup of patients with 60 indeterminate nodules revealed no evidence of adrenal malignancy. CONCLUSION. No case of malignancy was found in 322 incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules at CT of patients without known cancer. Imaging follow-up of such lesions may be unnecessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)780-784
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume210
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Adenoma
Myelolipoma
Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Adrenal nodule
  • Bilateral
  • Incidental
  • Incidentaloma
  • Indeterminate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules in patients without cancer : Is further workup necessary? / Corwin, Michael T; Chalfant, James S.; Loehfelm, Thomas W; Fananapazir, Ghaneh; Lamba, Ramit; Mayo-Smith, William W.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 210, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 780-784.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fa23427761714866b90e6c360d64f070,
title = "Incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules in patients without cancer: Is further workup necessary?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of malignancy in incidentally detected bilateral adrenal masses in patients with no known history of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective search of CT reports of patients with incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules was performed from January 1, 2002, to January 1, 2014. Patients were excluded if they had a known cancer or suspected functioning adrenal tumor; 161 patients were included. Nodules were characterized as benign or malignant on the basis of imaging features at the index CT examination, imaging features at subsequent adrenal protocol CT or MRI, imaging stability for a minimum of 1 year, or clinical follow-up of a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS. Mean nodule size was 1.8 cm (range, 0.7-4.9 cm). There were no cases of primary or secondary adrenal malignancy (95{\%} CI, 0.00-0.023). The nodules diagnosed on index CT scans were 73 adrenal adenomas and two myelolipomas. Seventy-four nodules were subsequently characterized as adrenal adenomas on the basis of imaging fndings. Of the 113 indeterminate nodules that had imaging follow-up, 111 were stable at the latest follow-up examination. One nodule grew 26{\%} over 8.1 years, and the other grew 59{\%} over 12.4 years. Clinical followup of patients with 60 indeterminate nodules revealed no evidence of adrenal malignancy. CONCLUSION. No case of malignancy was found in 322 incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules at CT of patients without known cancer. Imaging follow-up of such lesions may be unnecessary.",
keywords = "Adrenal nodule, Bilateral, Incidental, Incidentaloma, Indeterminate",
author = "Corwin, {Michael T} and Chalfant, {James S.} and Loehfelm, {Thomas W} and Ghaneh Fananapazir and Ramit Lamba and Mayo-Smith, {William W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.17.18543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "210",
pages = "780--784",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules in patients without cancer

T2 - Is further workup necessary?

AU - Corwin, Michael T

AU - Chalfant, James S.

AU - Loehfelm, Thomas W

AU - Fananapazir, Ghaneh

AU - Lamba, Ramit

AU - Mayo-Smith, William W.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of malignancy in incidentally detected bilateral adrenal masses in patients with no known history of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective search of CT reports of patients with incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules was performed from January 1, 2002, to January 1, 2014. Patients were excluded if they had a known cancer or suspected functioning adrenal tumor; 161 patients were included. Nodules were characterized as benign or malignant on the basis of imaging features at the index CT examination, imaging features at subsequent adrenal protocol CT or MRI, imaging stability for a minimum of 1 year, or clinical follow-up of a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS. Mean nodule size was 1.8 cm (range, 0.7-4.9 cm). There were no cases of primary or secondary adrenal malignancy (95% CI, 0.00-0.023). The nodules diagnosed on index CT scans were 73 adrenal adenomas and two myelolipomas. Seventy-four nodules were subsequently characterized as adrenal adenomas on the basis of imaging fndings. Of the 113 indeterminate nodules that had imaging follow-up, 111 were stable at the latest follow-up examination. One nodule grew 26% over 8.1 years, and the other grew 59% over 12.4 years. Clinical followup of patients with 60 indeterminate nodules revealed no evidence of adrenal malignancy. CONCLUSION. No case of malignancy was found in 322 incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules at CT of patients without known cancer. Imaging follow-up of such lesions may be unnecessary.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of malignancy in incidentally detected bilateral adrenal masses in patients with no known history of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective search of CT reports of patients with incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules was performed from January 1, 2002, to January 1, 2014. Patients were excluded if they had a known cancer or suspected functioning adrenal tumor; 161 patients were included. Nodules were characterized as benign or malignant on the basis of imaging features at the index CT examination, imaging features at subsequent adrenal protocol CT or MRI, imaging stability for a minimum of 1 year, or clinical follow-up of a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS. Mean nodule size was 1.8 cm (range, 0.7-4.9 cm). There were no cases of primary or secondary adrenal malignancy (95% CI, 0.00-0.023). The nodules diagnosed on index CT scans were 73 adrenal adenomas and two myelolipomas. Seventy-four nodules were subsequently characterized as adrenal adenomas on the basis of imaging fndings. Of the 113 indeterminate nodules that had imaging follow-up, 111 were stable at the latest follow-up examination. One nodule grew 26% over 8.1 years, and the other grew 59% over 12.4 years. Clinical followup of patients with 60 indeterminate nodules revealed no evidence of adrenal malignancy. CONCLUSION. No case of malignancy was found in 322 incidentally detected bilateral adrenal nodules at CT of patients without known cancer. Imaging follow-up of such lesions may be unnecessary.

KW - Adrenal nodule

KW - Bilateral

KW - Incidental

KW - Incidentaloma

KW - Indeterminate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044530991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044530991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.17.18543

DO - 10.2214/AJR.17.18543

M3 - Article

C2 - 29381378

AN - SCOPUS:85044530991

VL - 210

SP - 780

EP - 784

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -