Inadequacies of hospital-level critical congenital heart disease screening data reports: implications for research and quality efforts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Assess the quality of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening data reports in California, where CCHD screening is not mandatory but reporting is. Study design: Retrospective review of California hospital-level CCHD screening data to evaluate data reliability and adherence to state screening and reporting recommendations. Data were evaluated for internal consistency and compared to two databases. Results: Over one-third of hospitals did not submit data. Only 70.7% of the Vital Records live births were reported in CCHD screening data. Only 46% of reporting hospitals submitted data with matching numbers of completed screens and results, and 22% matched their respective live births in a second database. Conclusion: CCHD data reporting in California is incomplete, which may miss 359 CCHD cases/year from non-reporting. Data inconsistencies may miss additional cases. Mandatory screening, reporting, and improvements in data reliability are urgently needed to inform screening modifications and enhance timely detection and disease surveillance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Perinatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inadequacies of hospital-level critical congenital heart disease screening data reports: implications for research and quality efforts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this