In vitro biomechanical comparison of load to failure testing of a canine unconstrained medial compartment elbow arthroplasty system and normal canine thoracic limbs

Zachery F. Smith, K. L. Wendelburg, S. Tepic, Susan M Stover, T. Garcia-Nolen, P. B. Stearns, K. Hayashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Elbow dysplasia, primarily affecting the medial compartment, is the most common cause of lameness in the thoracic limb. Elbow arthroplasty is an option for end stage or severely affected patients. The purpose of this study was to compare ex vivo axial load to failure of an implanted novel elbow arthroplasty system to control limbs. The partial arthroplasty is a medial compartmental, unconstrained system, intended to allow conversion to total arthroplasty. We hypothesized that there would not be any significant difference between implanted and controlled limbs when loaded to failure. Six pairs of medium mixed breed canine cadaveric thoracic limbs were prepared for comparison of failure loading of control and implanted limbs. Axial compression was performed using a mechanical testing system. Failure loads were normalized to bodyweight. The mean normalized failure load (N/kg) for the implanted limbs and control limbs were 2.47 (range: 1.62-3.38) and 2.68 (range: 2.25-3.25), respectively. An implanted to control ratio of 0.93 ± 0.19 was calculated. The difference between paired control and implanted limbs in normalized failure loading was not significant (p = 0.38). There were not any differences noted in the yield load (p = 0.30), stiffness (p = 0.62), or energy (0.58). Failure modes were recorded. We concluded that the differences between implanted and control limbs in supra-physiologic axial load to failure were not significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-365
Number of pages10
JournalVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

elbows
chest
Elbow
limbs (animal)
Arthroplasty
Canidae
Thorax
Extremities
dogs
testing
In Vitro Techniques
lameness
body weight
energy

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Biomechanics
  • Canine elbow dysplasia
  • Unicompartmental elbow replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

In vitro biomechanical comparison of load to failure testing of a canine unconstrained medial compartment elbow arthroplasty system and normal canine thoracic limbs. / Smith, Zachery F.; Wendelburg, K. L.; Tepic, S.; Stover, Susan M; Garcia-Nolen, T.; Stearns, P. B.; Hayashi, K.

In: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2013, p. 356-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d2cfbfd93b94c6b80b8b602918a270a,
title = "In vitro biomechanical comparison of load to failure testing of a canine unconstrained medial compartment elbow arthroplasty system and normal canine thoracic limbs",
abstract = "Elbow dysplasia, primarily affecting the medial compartment, is the most common cause of lameness in the thoracic limb. Elbow arthroplasty is an option for end stage or severely affected patients. The purpose of this study was to compare ex vivo axial load to failure of an implanted novel elbow arthroplasty system to control limbs. The partial arthroplasty is a medial compartmental, unconstrained system, intended to allow conversion to total arthroplasty. We hypothesized that there would not be any significant difference between implanted and controlled limbs when loaded to failure. Six pairs of medium mixed breed canine cadaveric thoracic limbs were prepared for comparison of failure loading of control and implanted limbs. Axial compression was performed using a mechanical testing system. Failure loads were normalized to bodyweight. The mean normalized failure load (N/kg) for the implanted limbs and control limbs were 2.47 (range: 1.62-3.38) and 2.68 (range: 2.25-3.25), respectively. An implanted to control ratio of 0.93 ± 0.19 was calculated. The difference between paired control and implanted limbs in normalized failure loading was not significant (p = 0.38). There were not any differences noted in the yield load (p = 0.30), stiffness (p = 0.62), or energy (0.58). Failure modes were recorded. We concluded that the differences between implanted and control limbs in supra-physiologic axial load to failure were not significant.",
keywords = "Arthroplasty, Biomechanics, Canine elbow dysplasia, Unicompartmental elbow replacement",
author = "Smith, {Zachery F.} and Wendelburg, {K. L.} and S. Tepic and Stover, {Susan M} and T. Garcia-Nolen and Stearns, {P. B.} and K. Hayashi",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3415/VCOT-12-09-0115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "356--365",
journal = "Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology",
issn = "0932-0814",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vitro biomechanical comparison of load to failure testing of a canine unconstrained medial compartment elbow arthroplasty system and normal canine thoracic limbs

AU - Smith, Zachery F.

AU - Wendelburg, K. L.

AU - Tepic, S.

AU - Stover, Susan M

AU - Garcia-Nolen, T.

AU - Stearns, P. B.

AU - Hayashi, K.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Elbow dysplasia, primarily affecting the medial compartment, is the most common cause of lameness in the thoracic limb. Elbow arthroplasty is an option for end stage or severely affected patients. The purpose of this study was to compare ex vivo axial load to failure of an implanted novel elbow arthroplasty system to control limbs. The partial arthroplasty is a medial compartmental, unconstrained system, intended to allow conversion to total arthroplasty. We hypothesized that there would not be any significant difference between implanted and controlled limbs when loaded to failure. Six pairs of medium mixed breed canine cadaveric thoracic limbs were prepared for comparison of failure loading of control and implanted limbs. Axial compression was performed using a mechanical testing system. Failure loads were normalized to bodyweight. The mean normalized failure load (N/kg) for the implanted limbs and control limbs were 2.47 (range: 1.62-3.38) and 2.68 (range: 2.25-3.25), respectively. An implanted to control ratio of 0.93 ± 0.19 was calculated. The difference between paired control and implanted limbs in normalized failure loading was not significant (p = 0.38). There were not any differences noted in the yield load (p = 0.30), stiffness (p = 0.62), or energy (0.58). Failure modes were recorded. We concluded that the differences between implanted and control limbs in supra-physiologic axial load to failure were not significant.

AB - Elbow dysplasia, primarily affecting the medial compartment, is the most common cause of lameness in the thoracic limb. Elbow arthroplasty is an option for end stage or severely affected patients. The purpose of this study was to compare ex vivo axial load to failure of an implanted novel elbow arthroplasty system to control limbs. The partial arthroplasty is a medial compartmental, unconstrained system, intended to allow conversion to total arthroplasty. We hypothesized that there would not be any significant difference between implanted and controlled limbs when loaded to failure. Six pairs of medium mixed breed canine cadaveric thoracic limbs were prepared for comparison of failure loading of control and implanted limbs. Axial compression was performed using a mechanical testing system. Failure loads were normalized to bodyweight. The mean normalized failure load (N/kg) for the implanted limbs and control limbs were 2.47 (range: 1.62-3.38) and 2.68 (range: 2.25-3.25), respectively. An implanted to control ratio of 0.93 ± 0.19 was calculated. The difference between paired control and implanted limbs in normalized failure loading was not significant (p = 0.38). There were not any differences noted in the yield load (p = 0.30), stiffness (p = 0.62), or energy (0.58). Failure modes were recorded. We concluded that the differences between implanted and control limbs in supra-physiologic axial load to failure were not significant.

KW - Arthroplasty

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Canine elbow dysplasia

KW - Unicompartmental elbow replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884369279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884369279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3415/VCOT-12-09-0115

DO - 10.3415/VCOT-12-09-0115

M3 - Article

C2 - 23800744

AN - SCOPUS:84884369279

VL - 26

SP - 356

EP - 365

JO - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

JF - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

SN - 0932-0814

IS - 5

ER -