Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention

Richard L. Street, Christina Slee, Donna K. Kalauokalani, Dionne Evans Dean, Daniel J Tancredi, Richard L Kravitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the effect of a theoretically grounded, tailored education-coaching intervention to help patients more effectively discuss their pain-related questions, concerns, and preferences with physicians. Methods: Grounded in social-cognitive and communication theory, a tailored education-coaching (TEC) intervention was developed to help patients learn pain management and communication skills. In a RCT, 148 cancer patients agreed to have their consultations audio-recorded and were assigned to the intervention or a control group. The recordings were used to code for patients' questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressed concerns and to rate the quality of physicians' communication. Results: Patients in the TEC group discussed their pain concerns more than did patients in the control group. More active patients also had more baseline pain and interacted with physicians using participatory decision-making. Ratings of physicians' information about pain were higher when patients talked more about their pain concerns. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the efficacy of a theoretically grounded, coaching intervention to help cancer patients talk about pain control. Practice implications: Coaching interventions can be effective resources for helping cancer patients communicate about their pain concerns if they are theoretically grounded, can be integrated within clinical routines, and lead to improve health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-47
Number of pages6
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Communication
Physicians
Education
Pain
Mentoring
Cancer Pain
Assertiveness
Neoplasms
Control Groups
Pain Management
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Health

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Pain
  • Patient participation
  • Physician-patient communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention. / Street, Richard L.; Slee, Christina; Kalauokalani, Donna K.; Dean, Dionne Evans; Tancredi, Daniel J; Kravitz, Richard L.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 80, No. 1, 07.2010, p. 42-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Street, Richard L. ; Slee, Christina ; Kalauokalani, Donna K. ; Dean, Dionne Evans ; Tancredi, Daniel J ; Kravitz, Richard L. / Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2010 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 42-47.
@article{110b38e58a504d069beee36978a46f39,
title = "Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined the effect of a theoretically grounded, tailored education-coaching intervention to help patients more effectively discuss their pain-related questions, concerns, and preferences with physicians. Methods: Grounded in social-cognitive and communication theory, a tailored education-coaching (TEC) intervention was developed to help patients learn pain management and communication skills. In a RCT, 148 cancer patients agreed to have their consultations audio-recorded and were assigned to the intervention or a control group. The recordings were used to code for patients' questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressed concerns and to rate the quality of physicians' communication. Results: Patients in the TEC group discussed their pain concerns more than did patients in the control group. More active patients also had more baseline pain and interacted with physicians using participatory decision-making. Ratings of physicians' information about pain were higher when patients talked more about their pain concerns. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the efficacy of a theoretically grounded, coaching intervention to help cancer patients talk about pain control. Practice implications: Coaching interventions can be effective resources for helping cancer patients communicate about their pain concerns if they are theoretically grounded, can be integrated within clinical routines, and lead to improve health outcomes.",
keywords = "Cancer, Pain, Patient participation, Physician-patient communication",
author = "Street, {Richard L.} and Christina Slee and Kalauokalani, {Donna K.} and Dean, {Dionne Evans} and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and Kravitz, {Richard L}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention

AU - Street, Richard L.

AU - Slee, Christina

AU - Kalauokalani, Donna K.

AU - Dean, Dionne Evans

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Objective: This study examined the effect of a theoretically grounded, tailored education-coaching intervention to help patients more effectively discuss their pain-related questions, concerns, and preferences with physicians. Methods: Grounded in social-cognitive and communication theory, a tailored education-coaching (TEC) intervention was developed to help patients learn pain management and communication skills. In a RCT, 148 cancer patients agreed to have their consultations audio-recorded and were assigned to the intervention or a control group. The recordings were used to code for patients' questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressed concerns and to rate the quality of physicians' communication. Results: Patients in the TEC group discussed their pain concerns more than did patients in the control group. More active patients also had more baseline pain and interacted with physicians using participatory decision-making. Ratings of physicians' information about pain were higher when patients talked more about their pain concerns. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the efficacy of a theoretically grounded, coaching intervention to help cancer patients talk about pain control. Practice implications: Coaching interventions can be effective resources for helping cancer patients communicate about their pain concerns if they are theoretically grounded, can be integrated within clinical routines, and lead to improve health outcomes.

AB - Objective: This study examined the effect of a theoretically grounded, tailored education-coaching intervention to help patients more effectively discuss their pain-related questions, concerns, and preferences with physicians. Methods: Grounded in social-cognitive and communication theory, a tailored education-coaching (TEC) intervention was developed to help patients learn pain management and communication skills. In a RCT, 148 cancer patients agreed to have their consultations audio-recorded and were assigned to the intervention or a control group. The recordings were used to code for patients' questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressed concerns and to rate the quality of physicians' communication. Results: Patients in the TEC group discussed their pain concerns more than did patients in the control group. More active patients also had more baseline pain and interacted with physicians using participatory decision-making. Ratings of physicians' information about pain were higher when patients talked more about their pain concerns. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the efficacy of a theoretically grounded, coaching intervention to help cancer patients talk about pain control. Practice implications: Coaching interventions can be effective resources for helping cancer patients communicate about their pain concerns if they are theoretically grounded, can be integrated within clinical routines, and lead to improve health outcomes.

KW - Cancer

KW - Pain

KW - Patient participation

KW - Physician-patient communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953544309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953544309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 19962845

AN - SCOPUS:77953544309

VL - 80

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -